These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18855814)

  • 1. Guidelines for research on drugged driving.
    Walsh JM; Verstraete AG; Huestis MA; Mørland J
    Addiction; 2008 Aug; 103(8):1258-68. PubMed ID: 18855814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Commentary] guidelines for research on drugged driving: a good first step.
    Voas RB
    Addiction; 2008 Aug; 103(8):1269-70. PubMed ID: 18855815
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Drugs and driving.
    Walsh JM; de Gier JJ; Christopherson AS; Verstraete AG
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2004 Sep; 5(3):241-53. PubMed ID: 15276925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Recommendations for toxicological investigation of drug-impaired driving and motor vehicle fatalities.
    Logan BK; Lowrie KJ; Turri JL; Yeakel JK; Limoges JF; Miles AK; Scarneo CE; Kerrigan S; Farrell LJ
    J Anal Toxicol; 2013 Oct; 37(8):552-8. PubMed ID: 23943437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prevalence and trends of drugged driving in Canada.
    Robertson RD; Mainegra Hing M; Pashley CR; Brown SW; Vanlaar WGM
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Feb; 99(Pt A):236-241. PubMed ID: 27984814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interventions to Prevent Drugged Driving: A Systematic Review.
    Razaghizad A; Windle SB; Gore G; Benedetti A; Ells C; Grad R; Filion KB; Eisenberg MJ
    Am J Prev Med; 2021 Aug; 61(2):267-280. PubMed ID: 34099354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Differences in state drug testing and reporting by driver type in U.S. fatal traffic crashes.
    Slater ME; Castle IJ; Logan BK; Hingson RW
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Jul; 92():122-9. PubMed ID: 27060753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Correlates of drug use and driving among undergraduate college students.
    Kohn C; Saleheen H; Borrup K; Rogers S; Lapidus G
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 24345012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Results of the Queensland 2007-2012 roadside drug testing program: The prevalence of three illicit drugs.
    Davey J; Armstrong K; Martin P
    Accid Anal Prev; 2014 Apr; 65():11-7. PubMed ID: 24389088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Recommendations for Toxicological Investigation of Drug-Impaired Driving and Motor Vehicle Fatalities-2017 Update.
    Logan BK; D'Orazio AL; Mohr ALA; Limoges JF; Miles AK; Scarneo CE; Kerrigan S; Liddicoat LJ; Scott KS; Huestis MA
    J Anal Toxicol; 2018 Mar; 42(2):63-68. PubMed ID: 29186455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Drugged Driving in Wisconsin: Oral Fluid Versus Blood.
    Edwards LD; Smith KL; Savage T
    J Anal Toxicol; 2017 Jul; 41(6):523-529. PubMed ID: 28830121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Drugged Driving in the Opioid Era: Spatial Patterns of Oxycodone Use in Fatal Traffic Crashes, 2001-2016.
    Rookey BD
    Subst Use Misuse; 2018 Jul; 53(8):1288-1298. PubMed ID: 29293038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of drug concentrations measured in roadside surveys and in seriously injured drivers in Belgium.
    Van der Linden T; Isalberti C; Silverans P; Legrand SA; Verstraete AG
    Drug Test Anal; 2013 Jul; 5(7):541-8. PubMed ID: 23147915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prescription drugs, drugged driving and per se laws.
    Voas RB; DuPont RL; Shea CL; Talpins SK
    Inj Prev; 2013 Jun; 19(3):218-21. PubMed ID: 23024170
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Prevention of Drugged Driving: Needs, Barriers, and Self-Efficacy of Prevention Professionals.
    Stelter RL; Kupersmidt JB; Brodar K; Eisensmith S
    J Prim Prev; 2019 Aug; 40(4):449-461. PubMed ID: 31346838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Drugged driving, a review based on the experience in Norway.
    Christophersen AS; Mørland J
    Drug Alcohol Depend; 1997 Aug; 47(2):125-35. PubMed ID: 9298334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mass spectrometric approaches in impaired driving toxicology.
    Maurer HH
    Anal Bioanal Chem; 2009 Jan; 393(1):97-107. PubMed ID: 18759106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. User experience and operational feasibility of four point-of-collection oral fluid drug-testing devices according to Brazilian traffic agents.
    Pechansky F; Scherer JN; Schuch JB; Roglio V; Telles YM; Silvestrin R; Pasa G; Sousa T
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(1):30-36. PubMed ID: 30822144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The need for drugged driving per se laws: a commentary.
    DuPont RL; Voas RB; Walsh JM; Shea C; Talpins SK; Neil MM
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2012; 13(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 22239141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) consensus on science with treatment recommendations for pediatric and neonatal patients: pediatric basic and advanced life support.
    International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation
    Pediatrics; 2006 May; 117(5):e955-77. PubMed ID: 16618790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.