137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1886118)
1. The audit of cervical cytology screening programmes: discussion paper.
Ewart HE
J R Soc Med; 1991 Aug; 84(8):488-90. PubMed ID: 1886118
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Liquid-based cytology in cervical screening: a rapid and systematic review.
Payne N; Chilcott J; McGoogan E
Health Technol Assess; 2000; 4(18):1-73. PubMed ID: 10932023
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Reasons that some screening programmes fail to control cervical cancer.
Chamberlain J
IARC Sci Publ; 1986; (76):161-8. PubMed ID: 3570402
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Is proficiency testing in cervical cytology proficient?
Herbert A
J Clin Pathol; 1997 Jul; 50(7):536-7. PubMed ID: 9306928
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Is cervical screening necessary in older women?
Cruickshank ME
Cytopathology; 2001 Dec; 12(6):351-3. PubMed ID: 11843936
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Lessons from the audit of invasive cervical cancer.
Shaw PA
Cytopathology; 2002 Feb; 13(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 11985562
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Cervical cytology: perspectives from both sides of the Atlantic.
Bonfiglio TA
Hum Pathol; 1997 Feb; 28(2):117-9. PubMed ID: 9023389
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Cervical cancer audit: and what is quality?
Wilson PO
Cytopathology; 2002 Jun; 13(3):141-4. PubMed ID: 12060075
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of cervical cytology.
McCrory DC; Matchar DB; Bastian L; Datta S; Hasselblad V; Hickey J; Myers E; Nanda K
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ); 1999 Jan; (5):1-6. PubMed ID: 11925972
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Problems with audit in cervical cytology.
Womack C; Warren AY
Cytopathology; 2000 Jun; 11(3):200-1. PubMed ID: 10877284
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Audit shows weaknesses in cervical cancer screening.
Ferriman A
BMJ; 2001 May; 322(7295):1141. PubMed ID: 11348903
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Bayesian analysis of binary data from an audit of cervical smears.
Raab GM; Elton RA
Stat Med; 1993 Dec; 12(23):2179-89. PubMed ID: 8310188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cervical cytology screening.
Sherwood A
BMJ; 1988 Sep; 297(6648):625. PubMed ID: 3139256
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Managing incidents in the cervical screening programme.
Wilkinson MJ
Cytopathology; 2000 Oct; 11(5):287-9. PubMed ID: 11014655
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. National cervical screening programme.
Slater D
BMJ; 1990 Oct; 301(6757):887-8. PubMed ID: 2261531
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Towards effective cervical screening.
Havelock C; Havelock P
Practitioner; 1994 Apr; 238(1537):296-301. PubMed ID: 8183816
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Does cervical cancer screening do more harm than good?
Payne L; Lavis P
Nurs Times; 2001 Jul 19-25; 97(29):20. PubMed ID: 11957496
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Cervical cancer screening trends, 1992-2000.
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2003 Mar; 95(6):424. PubMed ID: 12644531
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [The impending loss of screening for cervix uteri carcinoma in the Netherlands].
Lammes FB
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1986 Apr; 130(15):673-4. PubMed ID: 3703044
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Cervical Cancer Screening. Europe against cancer programme.
Coleman D; Day N; Douglas G; Farmery E; Lynge E; Philip J; Segnan N
Eur J Cancer; 1993; 29A Suppl 4():S1-38. PubMed ID: 8274301
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
