These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18862619)

  • 21. The AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: fluoroscopy: optical coupling and the video system.
    Van Lysel MS
    Radiographics; 2000; 20(6):1769-86. PubMed ID: 11112828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Multi-image camera for spot radiography at fluoroscopic examinations.
    Hynes DM; Edmonds EW; Krametz KR; Baranoski D; Hughes T
    Radiology; 1980 Jul; 136(1):213-8. PubMed ID: 7384502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A new x-ray image intensifier tube with "9" screen.
    van der TUUK J; KUEHL W
    Medicamundi; 1959; 5():47-51. PubMed ID: 13840041
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. X-ray and optical stereo-based 3D sensor fusion system for image-guided neurosurgery.
    Kim DN; Chae YS; Kim MY
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2016 Apr; 11(4):529-41. PubMed ID: 26410838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [The Time Sequence Noise Characteristics of the X- ray Fluoroscopic Image].
    Umehara T; Matsumoto K; Fujita T; Maeda K; Ikeuchi Y; Hagihara Y; Fujikawa K
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2016 Jan; 72(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 26796929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Permanent records of the heart image as seen on the fluoroscopic screen.
    BACHHUBER HA
    Wis Med J; 1954 Jul; 53(7):380. PubMed ID: 13188018
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A comparison of mono- and poly-energetic x-ray beam performance for radiographic and fluoroscopic imaging.
    Boone JM; Seibert JA
    Med Phys; 1994 Dec; 21(12):1853-63. PubMed ID: 7700192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Performance evaluation of a prototype high resolution digital radiographic/near real-time fluoroscopic computerized tomographic system for radiotherapy simulation.
    Atari NA; Zwicker RD; Schmidt-Ullrich RK
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1995 May; 32(2):421-36. PubMed ID: 7751184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Simultaneous fluoroscopic and nuclear imaging: impact of collimator choice on nuclear image quality.
    van der Velden S; Beijst C; Viergever MA; de Jong HW
    Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 44(1):249-261. PubMed ID: 28044322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Variations in x-ray exposures to patients.
    Taylor KW; Patt NL; Johns HE
    J Can Assoc Radiol; 1979 Mar; 30(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 429443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Conversion of x-ray tube stand for camera support.
    LIVESAY HR; ROBINSON WH
    Med Techn Bull; 1951; 2(5):327-42. PubMed ID: 14874742
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Nationwide surveys of chest, abdomen, lumbosacral spine radiography, and upper gastrointestinal fluoroscopy: a summary of findings.
    Spelic DC; Kaczmarek RV; Hilohi MC; Moyal AE
    Health Phys; 2010 Mar; 98(3):498-514. PubMed ID: 20147791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Reduction in average fluoroscopic exposure times for interventional spinal procedures through the use of pulsed and low-dose image settings.
    Goodman BS; Carnel CT; Mallempati S; Agarwal P
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2011 Nov; 90(11):908-12. PubMed ID: 21952213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Accuracy of 100 mm x 100 mm mirror optic camera technique as compared to normal chest radiography technique.
    Virtama P; Lindgren I; Auerma K; Pamilo M; Dean PB
    Ann Clin Res; 1979 Dec; 11(6):246-8. PubMed ID: 547851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Radiation measurement with a solid-state-matrix camera.
    Ziskin MC; Philips C
    Radiology; 1979 Jun; 131(3):795-6. PubMed ID: 441394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Digital radiography of scoliosis with a scanning method: initial evaluation.
    Geijer H; Beckman K; Jonsson B; Andersson T; Persliden J
    Radiology; 2001 Feb; 218(2):402-10. PubMed ID: 11161153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A modified x-ray image intensifier with continuously variable field of view: resolution considerations.
    Drangova M; Holdsworth DW; Picot PA; Schulenburg K; Fenster A
    Med Phys; 1993; 20(6):1653-60. PubMed ID: 8309437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Large-screen image intensifier photofluorography compared with full-size screen-film technique in chest radiography.
    Manninen H; Rytkönen H; Soimakallio S; Terho EO; Hentunen J
    Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1985; 26(5):525-33. PubMed ID: 4072746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A cross-sectional study of the radiation dose and image quality of X-ray equipment used in IVR.
    Inaba Y; Chida K; Kobayashi R; Zuguchi M
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 17(4):391-401. PubMed ID: 27455503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Measurement of quantum noise in fluoroscopic systems for portal imaging.
    Mah DW; Rowlands JA; Rawlinson JA
    Med Phys; 1996 Feb; 23(2):231-8. PubMed ID: 8668103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.