These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1887020)

  • 1. Comparison of CT, low-field-strength MR imaging, and high-field-strength MR imaging. Work in progress.
    Orrison WW; Stimac GK; Stevens EA; LaMasters DL; Espinosa MC; Cobb L; Mettler FA
    Radiology; 1991 Oct; 181(1):121-7. PubMed ID: 1887020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. MR imaging field strength: prospective evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of MR for diagnosis of multiple sclerosis at 0.5 and 1.5 T.
    Lee DH; Vellet AD; Eliasziw M; Vidito L; Ebers GC; Rice GP; Hewett L; Dunlavy S
    Radiology; 1995 Jan; 194(1):257-62. PubMed ID: 7997564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diagnostic imaging of patients in a memory clinic: comparison of MR imaging and 64-detector row CT.
    Wattjes MP; Henneman WJ; van der Flier WM; de Vries O; Träber F; Geurts JJ; Scheltens P; Vrenken H; Barkhof F
    Radiology; 2009 Oct; 253(1):174-83. PubMed ID: 19635835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison between high-field-strength MR imaging and CT for screening of hepatic metastases: a receiver operating characteristic analysis.
    Rummeny EJ; Wernecke K; Saini S; Vassallo P; Wiesmann W; Oestmann JW; Kivelitz D; Reers B; Reiser MF; Peters PE
    Radiology; 1992 Mar; 182(3):879-86. PubMed ID: 1535912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diagnostic performance of dual-energy CT for the detection of traumatic bone marrow lesions in the ankle: comparison with MR imaging.
    Guggenberger R; Gnannt R; Hodler J; Krauss B; Wanner GA; Csuka E; Payne B; Frauenfelder T; Andreisek G; Alkadhi H
    Radiology; 2012 Jul; 264(1):164-73. PubMed ID: 22570505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of hepatic steatosis in patients undergoing liver resection: comparison of US, CT, T1-weighted dual-echo MR imaging, and point-resolved 1H MR spectroscopy.
    van Werven JR; Marsman HA; Nederveen AJ; Smits NJ; ten Kate FJ; van Gulik TM; Stoker J
    Radiology; 2010 Jul; 256(1):159-68. PubMed ID: 20574093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Early invasive cervical cancer: CT and MR imaging in preoperative evaluation - ACRIN/GOG comparative study of diagnostic performance and interobserver variability.
    Hricak H; Gatsonis C; Coakley FV; Snyder B; Reinhold C; Schwartz LH; Woodward PJ; Pannu HK; Amendola M; Mitchell DG
    Radiology; 2007 Nov; 245(2):491-8. PubMed ID: 17940305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Differential diagnostic approach to MR imaging of white matter diseases.
    Hesselink JR
    Top Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Aug; 17(4):243-63. PubMed ID: 17414999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Non-small cell lung cancer: whole-body MR examination for M-stage assessment--utility for whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging compared with integrated FDG PET/CT.
    Ohno Y; Koyama H; Onishi Y; Takenaka D; Nogami M; Yoshikawa T; Matsumoto S; Kotani Y; Sugimura K
    Radiology; 2008 Aug; 248(2):643-54. PubMed ID: 18539889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. CT and MR imaging in staging non-small cell bronchogenic carcinoma: report of the Radiologic Diagnostic Oncology Group.
    Webb WR; Gatsonis C; Zerhouni EA; Heelan RT; Glazer GM; Francis IR; McNeil BJ
    Radiology; 1991 Mar; 178(3):705-13. PubMed ID: 1847239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Characterization of liver lesions with mangafodipir trisodium-enhanced MR imaging: multicenter study comparing MR and dual-phase spiral CT.
    Oudkerk M; Torres CG; Song B; König M; Grimm J; Fernandez-Cuadrado J; Op de Beeck B; Marquardt M; van Dijk P; de Groot JC
    Radiology; 2002 May; 223(2):517-24. PubMed ID: 11997562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging versus four-phase multi-detector row computed tomography in assessing tumor regression after radiofrequency ablation in subjects with hepatocellular carcinomas.
    Yoon JH; Lee EJ; Cha SS; Han SS; Choi SJ; Juhn JR; Kim MH; Lee YJ; Park SJ
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2010 Mar; 21(3):348-56. PubMed ID: 20116285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of CT and MR in 400 patients with suspected disease of the brain and cervical spinal cord.
    Bradley WG; Waluch V; Yadley RA; Wycoff RR
    Radiology; 1984 Sep; 152(3):695-702. PubMed ID: 6463251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Three-dimensional dynamic susceptibility-weighted perfusion MR imaging at 3.0 T: feasibility and contrast agent dose.
    Manka C; Träber F; Gieseke J; Schild HH; Kuhl CK
    Radiology; 2005 Mar; 234(3):869-77. PubMed ID: 15665227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Thymic epithelial tumors: comparison of CT and MR imaging findings of low-risk thymomas, high-risk thymomas, and thymic carcinomas.
    Sadohara J; Fujimoto K; Müller NL; Kato S; Takamori S; Ohkuma K; Terasaki H; Hayabuchi N
    Eur J Radiol; 2006 Oct; 60(1):70-9. PubMed ID: 16766154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Liver lesions: manganese-enhanced MR and dual-phase helical CT for preoperative detection and characterization comparison with receiver operating characteristic analysis.
    Braga HJ; Choti MA; Lee VS; Paulson EK; Siegelman ES; Bluemke DA
    Radiology; 2002 May; 223(2):525-31. PubMed ID: 11997563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Whole-body high-field-strength (3.0-T) MR Imaging in Clinical Practice. Part I. Technical considerations and clinical applications.
    Kuhl CK; Träber F; Schild HH
    Radiology; 2008 Mar; 246(3):675-96. PubMed ID: 18309012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Gamekeeper thumb: comparison of MR arthrography with conventional arthrography and MR imaging in cadavers.
    Ahn JM; Sartoris DJ; Kang HS; Botte MJ; Trudell D; Haghighi P; Resnick D
    Radiology; 1998 Mar; 206(3):737-44. PubMed ID: 9494494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Unselected brain 0.5-T MR imaging: comparison of lesion detection and characterization with three T2-weighted sequences.
    Maubon AJ; Pothin A; Ferru JM; Berger VM; Daurès JP; Rouanet JP
    Radiology; 1998 Sep; 208(3):671-8. PubMed ID: 9722844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. MR imaging of pulmonary embolism: diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced 3D MR pulmonary angiography, contrast-enhanced low-flip angle 3D GRE, and nonenhanced free-induction FISP sequences.
    Kalb B; Sharma P; Tigges S; Ray GL; Kitajima HD; Costello JR; Chen Z; Martin DR
    Radiology; 2012 Apr; 263(1):271-8. PubMed ID: 22438448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.