86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1887020)
1. Comparison of CT, low-field-strength MR imaging, and high-field-strength MR imaging. Work in progress.
Orrison WW; Stimac GK; Stevens EA; LaMasters DL; Espinosa MC; Cobb L; Mettler FA
Radiology; 1991 Oct; 181(1):121-7. PubMed ID: 1887020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. MR imaging field strength: prospective evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of MR for diagnosis of multiple sclerosis at 0.5 and 1.5 T.
Lee DH; Vellet AD; Eliasziw M; Vidito L; Ebers GC; Rice GP; Hewett L; Dunlavy S
Radiology; 1995 Jan; 194(1):257-62. PubMed ID: 7997564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic imaging of patients in a memory clinic: comparison of MR imaging and 64-detector row CT.
Wattjes MP; Henneman WJ; van der Flier WM; de Vries O; Träber F; Geurts JJ; Scheltens P; Vrenken H; Barkhof F
Radiology; 2009 Oct; 253(1):174-83. PubMed ID: 19635835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison between high-field-strength MR imaging and CT for screening of hepatic metastases: a receiver operating characteristic analysis.
Rummeny EJ; Wernecke K; Saini S; Vassallo P; Wiesmann W; Oestmann JW; Kivelitz D; Reers B; Reiser MF; Peters PE
Radiology; 1992 Mar; 182(3):879-86. PubMed ID: 1535912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnostic performance of dual-energy CT for the detection of traumatic bone marrow lesions in the ankle: comparison with MR imaging.
Guggenberger R; Gnannt R; Hodler J; Krauss B; Wanner GA; Csuka E; Payne B; Frauenfelder T; Andreisek G; Alkadhi H
Radiology; 2012 Jul; 264(1):164-73. PubMed ID: 22570505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of hepatic steatosis in patients undergoing liver resection: comparison of US, CT, T1-weighted dual-echo MR imaging, and point-resolved 1H MR spectroscopy.
van Werven JR; Marsman HA; Nederveen AJ; Smits NJ; ten Kate FJ; van Gulik TM; Stoker J
Radiology; 2010 Jul; 256(1):159-68. PubMed ID: 20574093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Early invasive cervical cancer: CT and MR imaging in preoperative evaluation - ACRIN/GOG comparative study of diagnostic performance and interobserver variability.
Hricak H; Gatsonis C; Coakley FV; Snyder B; Reinhold C; Schwartz LH; Woodward PJ; Pannu HK; Amendola M; Mitchell DG
Radiology; 2007 Nov; 245(2):491-8. PubMed ID: 17940305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Differential diagnostic approach to MR imaging of white matter diseases.
Hesselink JR
Top Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Aug; 17(4):243-63. PubMed ID: 17414999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Non-small cell lung cancer: whole-body MR examination for M-stage assessment--utility for whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging compared with integrated FDG PET/CT.
Ohno Y; Koyama H; Onishi Y; Takenaka D; Nogami M; Yoshikawa T; Matsumoto S; Kotani Y; Sugimura K
Radiology; 2008 Aug; 248(2):643-54. PubMed ID: 18539889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. CT and MR imaging in staging non-small cell bronchogenic carcinoma: report of the Radiologic Diagnostic Oncology Group.
Webb WR; Gatsonis C; Zerhouni EA; Heelan RT; Glazer GM; Francis IR; McNeil BJ
Radiology; 1991 Mar; 178(3):705-13. PubMed ID: 1847239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Characterization of liver lesions with mangafodipir trisodium-enhanced MR imaging: multicenter study comparing MR and dual-phase spiral CT.
Oudkerk M; Torres CG; Song B; König M; Grimm J; Fernandez-Cuadrado J; Op de Beeck B; Marquardt M; van Dijk P; de Groot JC
Radiology; 2002 May; 223(2):517-24. PubMed ID: 11997562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging versus four-phase multi-detector row computed tomography in assessing tumor regression after radiofrequency ablation in subjects with hepatocellular carcinomas.
Yoon JH; Lee EJ; Cha SS; Han SS; Choi SJ; Juhn JR; Kim MH; Lee YJ; Park SJ
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2010 Mar; 21(3):348-56. PubMed ID: 20116285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of CT and MR in 400 patients with suspected disease of the brain and cervical spinal cord.
Bradley WG; Waluch V; Yadley RA; Wycoff RR
Radiology; 1984 Sep; 152(3):695-702. PubMed ID: 6463251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Three-dimensional dynamic susceptibility-weighted perfusion MR imaging at 3.0 T: feasibility and contrast agent dose.
Manka C; Träber F; Gieseke J; Schild HH; Kuhl CK
Radiology; 2005 Mar; 234(3):869-77. PubMed ID: 15665227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Thymic epithelial tumors: comparison of CT and MR imaging findings of low-risk thymomas, high-risk thymomas, and thymic carcinomas.
Sadohara J; Fujimoto K; Müller NL; Kato S; Takamori S; Ohkuma K; Terasaki H; Hayabuchi N
Eur J Radiol; 2006 Oct; 60(1):70-9. PubMed ID: 16766154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Liver lesions: manganese-enhanced MR and dual-phase helical CT for preoperative detection and characterization comparison with receiver operating characteristic analysis.
Braga HJ; Choti MA; Lee VS; Paulson EK; Siegelman ES; Bluemke DA
Radiology; 2002 May; 223(2):525-31. PubMed ID: 11997563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Whole-body high-field-strength (3.0-T) MR Imaging in Clinical Practice. Part I. Technical considerations and clinical applications.
Kuhl CK; Träber F; Schild HH
Radiology; 2008 Mar; 246(3):675-96. PubMed ID: 18309012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Gamekeeper thumb: comparison of MR arthrography with conventional arthrography and MR imaging in cadavers.
Ahn JM; Sartoris DJ; Kang HS; Botte MJ; Trudell D; Haghighi P; Resnick D
Radiology; 1998 Mar; 206(3):737-44. PubMed ID: 9494494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Unselected brain 0.5-T MR imaging: comparison of lesion detection and characterization with three T2-weighted sequences.
Maubon AJ; Pothin A; Ferru JM; Berger VM; Daurès JP; Rouanet JP
Radiology; 1998 Sep; 208(3):671-8. PubMed ID: 9722844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. MR imaging of pulmonary embolism: diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced 3D MR pulmonary angiography, contrast-enhanced low-flip angle 3D GRE, and nonenhanced free-induction FISP sequences.
Kalb B; Sharma P; Tigges S; Ray GL; Kitajima HD; Costello JR; Chen Z; Martin DR
Radiology; 2012 Apr; 263(1):271-8. PubMed ID: 22438448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
