These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1887510)

  • 41. [Treatment of ureteral calculi with extracorporeal lithotripsy. Comparison between the original Dornier HM3 and the modified lithotriptor].
    Zanetti G; Montanari E; Mazza L; Ceresoli A; Guarneri A; Mandressi E; Pisani E
    Arch Ital Urol Nefrol Androl; 1991 Mar; 63(1):71-5. PubMed ID: 1830419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. [Piezoelectric, electrohydraulic and electromagnetic shock wave lithotripsy for lower ureteral stone].
    Sun X; Chen C; Wang Y; Yu H
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 1999 Apr; 37(4):235-7. PubMed ID: 11829829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Evaluation of an experimental electrohydraulic discharge device for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: Pressure field of sparker array.
    Li G; Connors BA; Schaefer RB; Gallagher JJ; Evan AP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Nov; 142(5):3147. PubMed ID: 29195423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Out-of-focus shockwaves: a new tissue-protecting therapy?
    Loske AM; Gutierrez J; Di Grazia E; Fernández F
    Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2004 Dec; 76(4):159-62. PubMed ID: 15693429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Influence of Dornier HM3 system on respiration during extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy.
    Bromage PR; Bonsu AK; el-Faqih SR; Husain I
    Anesth Analg; 1989 Mar; 68(3):363-7. PubMed ID: 2919776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The effect of polypropylene vials on lithotripter shock waves.
    Cleveland RO; McAteer JA; Andreoli SP; Crum LA
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1997; 23(6):939-52. PubMed ID: 9300998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. [Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in cholecystolithiasis using a new type of minilithotripter].
    Wehrmann T; Schmitt T; Braden B; Seifert H; Marlinghaus EH; Caspary WF
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1999 Oct; 124(40):1158-63. PubMed ID: 10548945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Comparative studies of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy by Dornier HM3, EDAP LT 01 and Sonolith 2000 devices.
    Tan EC; Tung KH; Foo KT
    J Urol; 1991 Aug; 146(2):294-7. PubMed ID: 1856919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Cellular effects of piezoelectric versus electrohydraulic high energy shock waves.
    Smith FL; Carper SW; Hall JS; Gilligan BJ; Madsen EL; Storm FK
    J Urol; 1992 Feb; 147(2):486-90. PubMed ID: 1732629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Acoustic streaming in lithotripsy fields: preliminary observation using a particle image velocimetry method.
    Choi MJ; Doh DH; Hwang TG; Cho CH; Paeng DG; Rim GH; Coleman AJ
    Ultrasonics; 2006 Feb; 44(2):133-45. PubMed ID: 16376400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Shock wave sensors: I. Requirements and design.
    Lewin PA; Schafer ME
    J Lithotr Stone Dis; 1991 Jan; 3(1):3-17. PubMed ID: 10149140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. [Experience with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for urinary stone. Factors for requiring more than two ESWL treatments and its result].
    Sakamoto W; Kishimoto T; Yamamoto K; Sugimoto T; Senju M; Iimori H; Kanazawa T; Wada S; Maekawa M
    Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi; 1990 Apr; 81(4):589-92. PubMed ID: 2374331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Effects of lithotripter-generated high energy shock waves of mammalian cells in vitro.
    Kaver I; Koontz WW; Wilson JD; Guice JM; Smith MJ
    J Urol; 1992 Jan; 147(1):215-9. PubMed ID: 1729536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Acoustic field characterization of the Duolith: measurements and modeling of a clinical shock wave therapy device.
    Perez C; Chen H; Matula TJ; Karzova M; Khokhlova VA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):1663-74. PubMed ID: 23927207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The effects of a soft tissue mimicking medium and increased power settings on the location and magnitude of lithotripter peak positive pressure.
    Davros WJ; Garra BS; Pahira JJ; Zeman RK
    J Urol; 1993 Feb; 149(2):390-4. PubMed ID: 8426430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [Shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral stones--single institute experience in 661 consecutive cases].
    Halachmi S; Goldin O; Gleizarov E; Kaufman Z; Ginesin Y; Meretyk S
    Harefuah; 2005 Sep; 144(9):605-8, 680, 679. PubMed ID: 16218527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Confocal lens focused piezoelectric lithotripter.
    Thomas GPL; Chapelon JY; Birer A; Inserra C; Lafon C
    Ultrasonics; 2020 Apr; 103():106066. PubMed ID: 32028115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Prospective randomized comparative study of the effectiveness and safety of electrohydraulic and electromagnetic extracorporeal shock wave lithotriptors.
    Sheir KZ; Madbouly K; Elsobky E
    J Urol; 2003 Aug; 170(2 Pt 1):389-92. PubMed ID: 12853782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Comparison of electrohydraulic lithotripters with rigid and pressure-release ellipsoidal reflectors. I. Acoustic fields.
    Bailey MR; Blackstock DT; Cleveland RO; Crum LA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Oct; 104(4):2517-24. PubMed ID: 10491712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Comparison of Broad vs Narrow Focal Width Lithotripter Fields.
    Xing Y; Chen TT; Simmons WN; Sankin G; Cocks FH; Lipkin ME; Preminger GM; Zhong P
    J Endourol; 2017 May; 31(5):502-509. PubMed ID: 28340536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.