122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1889016)
1. Peel bond strengths of five impression material tray adhesives.
MacSween R; Price RB
J Can Dent Assoc; 1991 Aug; 57(8):654-7. PubMed ID: 1889016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of different adhesives on vinyl polysiloxane bond strength to two tray materials.
Peregrina A; Land MF; Wandling C; Johnston WM
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Sep; 94(3):209-13. PubMed ID: 16126072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of selected variables on the retention of irreversible hydrocolloid impression material.
Al-Athel MS
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Sep; 9(6):57-64. PubMed ID: 18784860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of custom tray material type and surface treatment on the tensile bond strength of an impression material/adhesive system.
Dixon DL; Breeding LC; Bosser MJ; Nafso AJ
Int J Prosthodont; 1993; 6(3):303-6. PubMed ID: 8397701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of custom tray material type and adhesive drying time on the tensile bond strength of an impression material/adhesive system.
Dixon DL; Breeding LC; Brown JS
Int J Prosthodont; 1994; 7(2):129-33. PubMed ID: 8003192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.
Thongthammachat S; Moore BK; Barco MT; Hovijitra S; Brown DT; Andres CJ
J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bond strength of three nonaqueous elastomeric impression materials to a light-activated resin tray.
Payne JA; Pereira BP
Int J Prosthodont; 1992; 5(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 1520444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [The bonding properties of various silicone impression materials at standardized surfaces using adhesives].
Morneburg T
Dtsch Stomatol (1990); 1991; 41(8):306-8. PubMed ID: 1816858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Retention strength of impression materials to a tray material using different adhesive methods: an in vitro study.
Marafie Y; Looney S; Nelson S; Chan D; Browning W; Rueggeberg F
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):432-40. PubMed ID: 19033027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Adhesive properties of several impression material systems: Part II.
Chai JY; Jameson LM; Moser JB; Hesby RA
J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Sep; 66(3):287-92. PubMed ID: 1800721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Peel bond strength between 3D printing tray materials and elastomeric impression/adhesive systems: A laboratory study.
Xu Y; Huettig F; Schille C; Schweizer E; Geis-Gerstorfer J; Spintzyk S
Dent Mater; 2020 Jul; 36(7):e241-e254. PubMed ID: 32456949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Factors that affect the adhesion of two irreversible hydrocolloid materials to two custom tray materials.
Smith SJ; McCord JF; Macfarlane TV
J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Oct; 88(4):423-30. PubMed ID: 12447220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study.
Caputi S; Varvara G
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 18395537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effects of primers and surface bonding characteristics on the adhesion of polyurethane to two commonly used silicone elastomers.
Chang PP; Hansen NA; Phoenix RD; Schneid TR
J Prosthodont; 2009 Jan; 18(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 19166545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bond strength of two nonaqueous elastomeric impression materials bonded to two thermoplastic resin tray materials.
Payne JA; Pereira BP
J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Dec; 74(6):563-8. PubMed ID: 8778378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of reactive adhesives on the tensile bond strength of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials to methyl methacrylate tray material.
Ona M; Takahashi H; Sato M; Igarashi Y; Wakabayashi N
Dent Mater J; 2010 May; 29(3):336-40. PubMed ID: 20484844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of disinfection of custom tray materials on adhesive properties of several impression material systems.
Thompson GA; Vermilyea SG; Agar JR
J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Dec; 72(6):651-6. PubMed ID: 7853264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The bond strength of elastomer tray adhesives to thermoplastic and acrylic resin tray materials.
Hogans WR; Agar JR
J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Apr; 67(4):541-3. PubMed ID: 1507140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of shear bond strength relative to two testing devices.
Pecora N; Yaman P; Dennison J; Herrero A
J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Nov; 88(5):511-5. PubMed ID: 12474001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of open tray implant impressions: an in vitro comparison of stock versus custom trays.
Burns J; Palmer R; Howe L; Wilson R
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 12644799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
