124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1889431)
1. ECG changes during cerebral angiography; a comparison of low osmolality contrast media.
Mitsumori M; Hayakawa K; Abe M
Eur J Radiol; 1991; 13(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 1889431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of low osmolality contrast media on electrophysiology and hemodynamics in coronary angiography: differences between an ionic (ioxaglate) and a nonionic (iohexol) agent.
Vik-Mo H; Følling M; Barth P; Nordrehaug JE; Bjørkhaug A; Rosland GA
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1990 Dec; 21(4):221-6. PubMed ID: 2276191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of low osmolality ionic (ioxaglate) versus nonionic (iopamidol) contrast media in cardiac angiography.
Wisneski JA; Gertz EW; Dahlgren M; Muslin A
Am J Cardiol; 1989 Feb; 63(7):489-95. PubMed ID: 2916435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Iohexol, ioxaglate and iopamidol in coronary angiography. A double-blind comparative study of 300 patients.
Soiva M; Hekali P; Keto P; Karumo J; Salonen O; Heikkilä J
Australas Radiol; 1991 May; 35(2):109-11. PubMed ID: 1930006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Three new low-osmolality contrast agents: a comparative study of patient discomfort.
Smith DC; Yahiku PY; Maloney MD; Hart KL
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1988; 9(1):137-9. PubMed ID: 3124566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Experience with low osmolar contrast media a clinical and experimental study.
Pokorny L; Nagy E; Vadon G
Ann Radiol (Paris); 1989; 32(1):40-2. PubMed ID: 2742325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Adverse reactions of low osmolality contrast media during cardiac angiography: a prospective randomized multicenter study.
Gertz EW; Wisneski JA; Miller R; Knudtson M; Robb J; Dragatakis L; Browne KF; Vetrovec G; Smith SC
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1992 Apr; 19(5):899-906. PubMed ID: 1552109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. ECG changes during cerebral angiography. An analysis of 334 patients--942 cerebral angiographies.
Hayakawa K; Nishimura Y; Yoshida M; Itoh K; Hayashi N; Aoki J; Nakamura K; Imai M; Ono T; Morikawa S
Neuroradiology; 1984; 26(5):369-73. PubMed ID: 6544378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Risk of clot formation with ionic and nonionic contrast media in cerebral angiography. Tama Contrast Media Study Group.
Sato E; Saito I
Acad Radiol; 1996 Nov; 3(11):925-8. PubMed ID: 8959182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Significance of low osmolarity contrast media in state of the art roentgen diagnosis].
Pokorny L; Kiss I; Karcsú S; Nehéz I; Feledi J; Vadon G
Orv Hetil; 1989 Jun; 130(25):1317-21. PubMed ID: 2664636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of contrast media on the RR and QT interval during coronary arteriography.
Mitsumori M; Hayakawa K; Soga T; Maeda M; Torizuka T; Okuno Y; Misaki T; Dokoh S
Acta Radiol; 1991 Mar; 32(2):120-3. PubMed ID: 2031794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Changes in renal function immediately after the angiography].
Murakami R; Tajima H; Kumazaki T
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1994 Jun; 54(7):605-12. PubMed ID: 8065882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of high- and low-osmolar contrast media on renal plasma flow and glomerular filtration rate in euvolaemic and dehydrated rats. A comparison between ioxithalamate, iopamidol, iohexol and ioxaglate.
Nygren A; Ulfendahl HR
Acta Radiol; 1989; 30(4):383-9. PubMed ID: 2775601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ionized calcium levels in coronary sinus blood during coronary angiography: effects of four contrast media.
Mitsumori M; Hayakawa K; Torizuka T; Okuno Y; Monji T; Uwatoko H; Kitamura K; Abe M
Radiology; 1992 Apr; 183(1):159-61. PubMed ID: 1549664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Delayed vs. immediate adverse reactions to ionic and non-ionic low-osmolality contrast media.
Oi H; Yamazaki H; Matsushita M
Radiat Med; 1997; 15(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 9134581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Allergic-type adverse reactions to low osmolality contrast media in patients with a history of allergy or asthma.
Simon MR
Invest Radiol; 1995 May; 30(5):285-90. PubMed ID: 7558732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Nonionic low-osmolar contrast media have no impact on major adverse cardiac events in patients undergoing coronary stenting with appropriate antiplatelet therapy.
Danzi GB; Capuano C; Sesana M; Predolini S; Baglini R
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2003 Dec; 60(4):477-82. PubMed ID: 14624424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Role of low-osmolality contrast media in thromboembolic complications: scanning electron microscopy study.
Casalini E
Radiology; 1992 Jun; 183(3):741-4. PubMed ID: 1584930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Percutaneous coronary angioscopic comparison of thrombus formation during percutaneous coronary angioplasty with ionic and nonionic low osmolality contrast media in unstable angina.
Qureshi NR; den Heijer P; Crijns HJ
Am J Cardiol; 1997 Sep; 80(6):700-4. PubMed ID: 9315572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reports on contrast media reactions: analysis of data from reports to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
Lasser EC; Lyon SG; Berry CC
Radiology; 1997 Jun; 203(3):605-10. PubMed ID: 9169676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
