These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1889431)

  • 41. Comparison of iohexol and ioxaglate for intravenous digital subtraction angiography of the neck and head.
    Delcour C; Vanderhofstadt A; Vandenbosch G; Baleriaux D; Struyven J
    Invest Radiol; 1987 Oct; 22(10):811-3. PubMed ID: 3323113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A comparison of heparinized low osmolality ionic and nonionic contrast media in 500 patients undergoing cardiac angiography.
    Feldman RL
    Clin Cardiol; 1990 Nov; 13(11):794-6. PubMed ID: 2272136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Renal failure in 57 925 patients undergoing coronary procedures using iso-osmolar or low-osmolar contrast media.
    Liss P; Persson PB; Hansell P; Lagerqvist B
    Kidney Int; 2006 Nov; 70(10):1811-7. PubMed ID: 17003814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Comparison of ionic and nonionic low-osmolar contrast media in coronary arteriography. A crossover study in children.
    Saito H; Kimura K; Takamiya M; Yamamoto K; Ohta M; Yamagami H; Kamiya T
    Invest Radiol; 1988 Dec; 23(12):910-3. PubMed ID: 3203992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Assays for plasma complement activation by x-ray contrast media.
    Eaton S; Tsay HM; Yost F; Tweedle MF
    Invest Radiol; 1990 Jul; 25(7):789-92. PubMed ID: 2391195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Frequencies of reactions to iohexol versus ioxaglate.
    Vacek JL; Gersema L; Woods M; Bower C; Beauchamp GD
    Am J Cardiol; 1990 Nov; 66(17):1277-8. PubMed ID: 2239740
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Tissue fluid shifts during renal arteriography with conventional and low osmolality agents.
    Morris TW; Harnish PP; Reece K; Katzberg RW
    Invest Radiol; 1983; 18(4):335-40. PubMed ID: 6618823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Adverse reactions during intravenous urography: are these due to histamine release?
    Herd CM; Robertson AR; Frewin DB; Taylor WB
    Br J Radiol; 1988 Jan; 61(721):5-11. PubMed ID: 2450612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Comparison of the electrophysiologic effects of ioxaglate and iopamidol during selective coronary arteriography.
    Amiel M; Moll T; Revel D; Corot C; Touboul T; Kirkorian G; Girard P
    Invest Radiol; 1990 Sep; 25 Suppl 1():S141-3. PubMed ID: 2283235
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [Early hemodynamic cardiovascular reactions to nonionic low-osmolar contrast media in coronary angiography].
    Wink K
    Rontgenblatter; 1988 Sep; 41(9):384-8. PubMed ID: 3175478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Low osmolality contrast media and metabolic changes in the myocardium during free and reduced coronary flow in the dog.
    Kløw NE; Hevrøy O; Mortensen E; Dale K; Mjøs OD
    Invest Radiol; 1990 Feb; 25(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 2312248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Mechanism of ECG changes and arrhythmogenic properties of low osmolality contrast media during coronary arteriography in dog.
    Kløw NE; Tande PM; Hevrøy O; Refsum H
    Cardiovasc Res; 1990 Apr; 24(4):303-8. PubMed ID: 2346966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Comparison between a low-osmolar ionic (ioxaglate) and a low-osmolar non-ionic (iopamidol) contrast agent in cardiac imaging.
    Scholtz ME; Svatos VJ; Myburgh DP
    S Afr Med J; 1988 Feb; 73(3):168-71. PubMed ID: 3340942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The new contrast agents: a perspective.
    Bettmann MA
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 1986; 9(4):173-5. PubMed ID: 3094946
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Comparison of the image quality of intravenous urograms using low-osmolar contrast media.
    Kaye B; Howard J; Foord KD; Cumberland DC
    Br J Radiol; 1988 Jul; 61(727):589-91. PubMed ID: 3408846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. A comparison of iopamidol and iohexol in cerebral angiography.
    Pelz DM; Fox AJ; Viñuela F; Lylyk P
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1988; 9(6):1163-6. PubMed ID: 3143239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Effects of ionic and nonionic contrast media on cardiohemodynamics and quality of radiographic image during canine angiography.
    Nakamura H; Kurata M; Haruta K; Takeda K
    J Vet Med Sci; 1994 Feb; 56(1):91-6. PubMed ID: 8204767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Nephrotoxicity of high- and low-osmolality contrast media.
    Jevnikar AM; Finnie KJ; Dennis B; Plummer DT; Avila A; Linton AL
    Nephron; 1988; 48(4):300-5. PubMed ID: 3362276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Incidence of ventricular fibrillation during coronary arteriography in the rabbit. A comparative study of isotonic ioxaglate and iohexol.
    Donadieu AM; Hartl C; Cardinal A; Bonnemain B
    Invest Radiol; 1987 Feb; 22(2):106-10. PubMed ID: 3557882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. [The effects of angiographic contrast media on the aggregation and morphology of red cells in vitro].
    Higashi S; Yasukochi H; Ishioka K; Toya H; Tanibe M; Koga M; Shirato M
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Jun; 49(6):748-57. PubMed ID: 2798065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.