These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18895528)
21. Direct polyacrylic restorations. TANANBAUM N Tufts Dent Outlook; 1946 Mar; 20():24-7. PubMed ID: 21025022 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Amalgam; inconsistencies in its use in restorations. MILLER EC J Am Dent Assoc; 1946 Mar; 33():349-58. PubMed ID: 21026280 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Five-year clinical outcome of posterior zirconia ceramic inlay-retained FDPs with a modified design. Chaar MS; Kern M J Dent; 2015 Dec; 43(12):1411-5. PubMed ID: 26561926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Ceramic inlays: a case presentation and lessons learned from the literature. Boushell LW; Ritter AV J Esthet Restor Dent; 2009; 21(2):77-87. PubMed ID: 19368595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Cast gold restorations by a simple and accurate method. GARN BJ Dent Dig; 1947 Feb; 53(2):66-8. PubMed ID: 20242401 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. 6-year clinical evaluation of fired ceramic inlays. Hayashi M; Tsuchitani Y; Miura M; Takeshige F; Ebisu S Oper Dent; 1998; 23(6):318-26. PubMed ID: 9855855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Present status of the inlay casting technic. SKINNER EW Ill Dent J; 1946 Dec; 15(12):499-504. PubMed ID: 20283622 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. In vitro evaluation of push-out bond strength of direct ceramic inlays to tooth surface with fiber-reinforced composite at the interface. Cekic I; Ergun G; Uctasli S; Lassila LV J Prosthet Dent; 2007 May; 97(5):271-8. PubMed ID: 17547945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Load-bearing capacity of indirect inlay-retained fixed dental prostheses made of particulate filler composite alone or reinforced with E-glass fibers impregnated with various monomers. Özcan M; Koekoek W; Pekkan G J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2012 Aug; 12():160-7. PubMed ID: 22732482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Stress distributions in adhesively cemented ceramic and resin-composite Class II inlay restorations: a 3D-FEA study. Ausiello P; Rengo S; Davidson CL; Watts DC Dent Mater; 2004 Nov; 20(9):862-72. PubMed ID: 15451242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars. Dejak B; Mlotkowski A J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The all-ceramic, inlay supported fixed partial denture. Part 1. Ceramic inlay preparation design: a literature review. Thompson MC; Thompson KM; Swain M Aust Dent J; 2010 Jun; 55(2):120-7; quiz 231. PubMed ID: 20604751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Influence of tooth mobility on critical stresses in all-ceramic inlay-retained fixed dental prostheses: a finite element study. Möllers K; Parkot D; Kirsten A; Güth JF; Edelhoff D; Fischer H Dent Mater; 2012 Feb; 28(2):146-51. PubMed ID: 22104732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Artificial teeth in Navy dental prosthetics. SUPPLEE SH; MURPHY WJ U S Nav Med Bull; 1946 Aug; 46():1185-91. PubMed ID: 20993306 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]