These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18911196)

  • 1. The changing trends in cesarean section; analysis of cesarean sections performed in Detroit in 1925, 1930 and 1945.
    MACK HC; SIDDALL RS
    J Mich State Med Soc; 1948 Mar; 47(3):288-93. PubMed ID: 18911196
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cesarean section: recent trends.
    Martin MC; Moyyen S; Gelfand M
    Can J Surg; 1982 Jan; 25(1):85-7, 91. PubMed ID: 7055772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The changing indications and rates of cesarean section in one academic center over a 16-year period (1997-2012).
    Lurie S; Shalev A; Sadan O; Golan A
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Aug; 55(4):499-502. PubMed ID: 27590370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cesarean section: trends and morbidity.
    Baskett TF; McMillen RM
    Can Med Assoc J; 1981 Oct; 125(7):723-6. PubMed ID: 7326654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Recent trends in cesarean section use in California.
    Stafford RS
    West J Med; 1990 Nov; 153(5):511-4. PubMed ID: 2260286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Yearly trends in caesarean section and cesarean mortality at Ile-Ife, Nigeria.
    Okonofua FE; Makinde ON; Ayangade SO
    Trop J Obstet Gynaecol; 1988; 1(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 12179273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Trends in cesarean section rates.
    Halpin GJ; Rose E; Shapiro E
    N J Med; 1989 Nov; 86(11):867-73. PubMed ID: 2608208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Repeat cesarean section; analysis of 162 repeat cesarean sections in 143 cases as to sequelae and impressions concerning validity of the initial sections.
    BARTHOLOMEW RA; COLVIN ED; GRIMES WH; FISH JS; LESTER WM
    Obstet Gynecol; 1956 Feb; 7(2):137-44. PubMed ID: 13288965
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Changing indications for cesarean section. A 38-year experience at a community hospital.
    Haddad H; Lundy LE
    Obstet Gynecol; 1978 Feb; 51(2):133-7. PubMed ID: 622222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cesarean section in Detroit during 1945; a comparison with 1925 and 1930.
    MACK HC; SIDDALL RS
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1948 Jul; 56(1):60-73. PubMed ID: 18869719
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Changing trends and indications for cesarean section in the last few decades].
    Nagy S
    Orv Hetil; 2014 Jul; 155(29):1140-6. PubMed ID: 25016445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cesarean sections in Alberta from April 1979 to March 1988.
    Saunders LD; Flowerdew G
    CMAJ; 1991 May; 144(10):1243-9, 1252. PubMed ID: 2025819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Cesarean section trends at the Toulouse University Hospital, from 1983 to 1993. Determinants and consequences].
    Baille MF; Grandjean H; Arnaud C; Lesourd F; Fournie A; Reme JM; Pontonnier G
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1995; 24(7):763-71. PubMed ID: 8568187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Analysis of labor methods after cesarean sections in the last 50 years].
    Łatkowski K; Gryboś M; Blok R; Korzeniewski J
    Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2003 Sep; 15(87):239-43. PubMed ID: 14679848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Trends in cesarean section deliveries in Canada.
    Nair C
    Health Rep; 1991; 3(3):203-19. PubMed ID: 1801954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Retrospective analysis of ocular disorders and frequency of cesarean sections for ocular indications in 2000-2008--our own experience].
    Socha MW; Piotrowiak I; Jagielska I; Kazdepka-Ziemińska A; Szymański M; Duczmal M; Zalewska M; Szymański W
    Ginekol Pol; 2010 Mar; 81(3):188-91. PubMed ID: 20486539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Changing trends in cesarean section.
    LOW DM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1951 Jan; 61(1):197-9. PubMed ID: 14799530
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Changing trends in cesarean section.
    TAMIS AB; CLAHR J
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1948 Oct; 56(4):700-6. PubMed ID: 18882822
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cesarean section experience at the University of California Hospital.
    KING EB
    Calif Med; 1949 Aug; 71(2):106-9. PubMed ID: 18146911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Analysis of delivery types in women after previous cesarean section].
    Kuś E; Orłowska K; Kowalska-Koprek U; Kalinka J; Berner-Trabska M; Estemberg D; Brzozowska M; Karowicz-Bilińska A
    Ginekol Pol; 2012 Mar; 83(3):174-7. PubMed ID: 22568191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.