These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. A prospective, randomized trial evaluating the use of hydrogel coated latex versus all silicone urethral catheters after urethral reconstructive surgery. Erickson BA; Navai N; Patil M; Chang A; Gonzalez CM J Urol; 2008 Jan; 179(1):203-6. PubMed ID: 18001794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Urethral reaction to foreign objects. Painter MR; Borski AA; Trevino GS; Clark WE J Urol; 1971 Aug; 106(2):227-30. PubMed ID: 5107329 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Post-catheterisation urethral strictures. A clinical and experimental study. Edwards LE; Lock R; Powell C; Jones P Br J Urol; 1983 Feb; 55(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 6824864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Tissue toxicity of urinary catheters]. Talja M; Ruutu M; Saarela K; Andersson LC; Alfthan O Duodecim; 1989; 105(13-14):1252-9. PubMed ID: 2670530 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Zinc compounds in urethral catheters. A possible source of toxicity? Talja M; Saarela K; Ruutu M; Andersson LC; Alfthan O Ann Chir Gynaecol Suppl; 1993; 206():74-9. PubMed ID: 8291875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative evaluation of commonly used catheters through histopathological changes induced in bladder urothelium. Singh S; Sharma S; Sen R; Garg P; Airon R Urol Int; 1994; 53(3):155-7. PubMed ID: 7544041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Unexpected urethral strictures after short-term catheterization in open-heart surgery. Ruutu M; Alfthan O; Heikkinen L; Järvinen A; Konttinen M; Lehtonen T; Merikallio E; Standertskjöld-Nordenstam CG Scand J Urol Nephrol; 1984; 18(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 6719056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of silicone and latex catheters in the development of urethral stricture after cardiac surgery. Ferrie BG; Groome J; Sethia B; Kirk D Br J Urol; 1986 Oct; 58(5):549-50. PubMed ID: 3490896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A prospective randomized trial of the LoFric hydrophilic coated catheter versus conventional plastic catheter for clean intermittent catheterization. Vapnek JM; Maynard FM; Kim J J Urol; 2003 Mar; 169(3):994-8. PubMed ID: 12576829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Determination of the coefficient of kinetic friction of urinary catheter materials. Khoury AE; Olson ME; Villari F; Costerton JW J Urol; 1991 Mar; 145(3):610-2. PubMed ID: 1997718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel group study comparing polyvinyl chloride and polyvinyl chloride-free catheter materials. Witjes JA; Del Popolo G; Marberger M; Jonsson O; Kaps HP; Chapple CR J Urol; 2009 Dec; 182(6):2794-8. PubMed ID: 19837425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Acute urinary retention: which catheter? Allardice JT; Standfield NJ; Wyatt AP Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1988 Nov; 70(6):366-8. PubMed ID: 3207328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Re: A prospective, randomized trial evaluating the use of hydrogel coated latex versus all silicone urethral catheters after urethral reconstructive surgery. B. A. Erickson, N. Navai, M. Patil, A. Chang and C. M. Gonzalez. J Urol 2008; 179: 203-206. Panda A; Dorairajan LN; Nayak P; Kumar S J Urol; 2008 Sep; 180(3):1185; author reply 1185-6. PubMed ID: 18639900 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Early catheter removal and postoperative status of bladder outflow after retropubic radical prostatectomy. Kanno T; Shibasaki N; Ito M; Tsuji Y; Taki Y; Takeuchi H Hinyokika Kiyo; 2004 Nov; 50(11):773-7. PubMed ID: 15628537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]