These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1891593)

  • 1. The amalgam controversy.
    Simonsen RJ
    Quintessence Int; 1991 Apr; 22(4):241. PubMed ID: 1891593
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dental amalgam and mercury.
    Mackert JR
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1991 Aug; 122(8):54-61. PubMed ID: 1918686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mercury (and the debate goes on).
    Williams P; Kasloff Z
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1991 Feb; 57(2):113-8. PubMed ID: 2021891
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Amalgam: a proven restorative material.
    Giannobile WV; Eick JD
    Mo Dent J; 1992; 72(5):17-9. PubMed ID: 1287398
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Amalgam allergy and amalgam controversy].
    Lübbe J; Wüthrich B
    Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1996 Apr; 126(16):661-5. PubMed ID: 8658093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Unwarranted removal of dental amalgams.
    Bales DJ
    Oper Dent; 1991; 16(6):201. PubMed ID: 1816542
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The amalgam vs. composite controversy.
    Eames WB
    J Colo Dent Assoc; 1984; 62(6):4-5. PubMed ID: 6589245
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The amalgam controversy.
    O'Connor N
    J Ir Dent Assoc; 1994; 40(3):58-60. PubMed ID: 8975044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Special report: dental amalgam.
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1991 Jan; 122(1):suppl 6 p.. PubMed ID: 1999564
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Amalgam controversy: an update for dental students.
    Mather F
    Dentistry; 1990 Oct; 10(3):14-6. PubMed ID: 2097114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Amalgam. I. The third amalgam war. II. Mercury sources].
    Schuurs AH; Davidson CL
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1993 Jan; 100(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 11822120
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Who cares if they outlaw amalgam?
    Marker V
    Dent Abstr; 1992; 37(4):191-2. PubMed ID: 1499776
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Amalgams--discussion of a controversy].
    Oehme P; Krause W; Michael N; Göres E; Göres M
    Pharmazie; 1994 May; 49(5):361-3. PubMed ID: 8016182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Amalgam controversy--media hype or reality.
    Strassler HE
    J Esthet Dent; 1991; 3(2):77-8. PubMed ID: 1888549
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Exposure to mercury from dental amalgam].
    Graabak G
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1998 Apr; 118(11):1761. PubMed ID: 9621772
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Unwarranted and unprofessional: the superfluous removal of clinically acceptable amalgams.
    Katz HS
    Oper Dent; 1991; 16(3):113-5. PubMed ID: 1803334
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Mercury poisoning due to amalgam fillings].
    Johansson K
    Tandteknikern; 1986 Dec; 55(12):430-1. PubMed ID: 3473734
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Amalgam clearing in mercury poisoning].
    Berglund F
    Lakartidningen; 1990 Feb; 87(6):368. PubMed ID: 2314175
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Mercury poisoning due to dental amalgam].
    Pleva J
    Tandteknikern; 1985 May; 54(5):166, 168, 170-4. PubMed ID: 3868203
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Mercury in dental amalgams--a stress on the body or poisoning?].
    Schiele R; Kohout J; Senft V
    Cas Lek Cesk; 1997 Oct; 136(19):587-90. PubMed ID: 9600138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.