These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1891603)

  • 1. The effect of bonding agent and fissure sealant on microleakage of composite resin restorations.
    Reid JS; Saunders WP; Chen YY
    Quintessence Int; 1991 Apr; 22(4):295-8. PubMed ID: 1891603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing microleakage in resin composite restorations rebonded with a surface sealant and three low-viscosity resin systems.
    Ramos RP; Chinelatti MA; Chimello DT; Dibb RG
    Quintessence Int; 2002 Jun; 33(6):450-6. PubMed ID: 12073726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An in vitro study of microleakage of occlusal composite restorations polymerized by a conventional curing light and a PAC curing light.
    Stritikus J; Owens B
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2000; 24(3):221-7. PubMed ID: 11314147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of flowable liner and margin location on microleakage of conventional and packable class II resin composites.
    Tredwin CJ; Stokes A; Moles DR
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 15765955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of composite resin placement and use of an unfilled resin on the microleakage of two dentin bonding agents.
    Saunders WP; Strang R; Ahmad I
    Am J Dent; 1990 Aug; 3(4):153-6. PubMed ID: 2076240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of one-bottle adhesive as an intermediate bonding layer to reduce sealant microleakage on saliva-contaminated enamel.
    Hebling J; Feigal RJ
    Am J Dent; 2000 Aug; 13(4):187-91. PubMed ID: 11763928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The marginal seal of Class II restorations: flowable composite resin compared to injectable glass ionomer.
    Payne JH
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1999; 23(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 10204453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of a sealant on the microleakage of composite resin restorations: an in vivo study.
    Akyüz S; Menteş A; Oktay C
    J Marmara Univ Dent Fac; 1992 Sep; 1(3):211-4. PubMed ID: 1308779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of two different restorative techniques using resin-based composites on microleakage.
    Aranha AC; Pimenta LA
    Am J Dent; 2004 Apr; 17(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 15151335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of three surface sealants on marginal sealing of Class V composite resin restorations.
    Ramos RP; Chimello DT; Chinelatti MA; Dibb RG; Mondelli J
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):448-53. PubMed ID: 11203855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [In vitro study of the microleakage pattern around posterior composite resin restorations using a new dentin bonding agent].
    Tzoutzas J; Donovan T; Babou M
    Odontostomatol Proodos; 1989 Dec; 43(6):505-10. PubMed ID: 2518077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Short-term evaluation of resin sealing and rebonding on amalgam microleakage: an SEM observation.
    Moosavi H; Sadeghi S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Mar; 9(3):32-9. PubMed ID: 18335117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of surface sealants on microleakage of composite resin restorations.
    dos Santos PH; Pavan S; Assunção WG; Consani S; Correr-Sobrinho L; Sinhoreti MA
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2008; 75(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 18505644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of a surface sealant on microleakage of Class V restorations.
    May KN; Swift EJ; Wilder AD; Futrell SC
    Am J Dent; 1996 Jun; 9(3):133-6. PubMed ID: 9002805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Microleakage of bonding agents with wet and dry bonding techniques.
    Saunders WP; Saunders EM
    Am J Dent; 1996 Feb; 9(1):34-6. PubMed ID: 9002813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of thickness of flowable resins on marginal leakage in class II composite restorations.
    Malmström HS; Schlueter M; Roach T; Moss ME
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):373-80. PubMed ID: 12120775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Microleakage of Class II box-type composite restorations.
    Opdam NJ; Roeters JJ; Burgersdijk RC
    Am J Dent; 1998 Aug; 11(4):160-4. PubMed ID: 10388369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Microleakage associated with resin composite-cemented, cast glass ceramic restoration.
    Blair KF; Koeppen RG; Schwartz RS; Davis RD
    Int J Prosthodont; 1993; 6(6):579-84. PubMed ID: 8148030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In vitro microleakage of luting cements and crown foundation material.
    Lindquist TJ; Connolly J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Mar; 85(3):292-8. PubMed ID: 11264938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Microleakage of ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements and dentin adhesives.
    Uludag B; Ozturk O; Ozturk AN
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 19782826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.