These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

456 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18922257)

  • 1. The accuracy of implant impressions: a systematic review.
    Lee H; So JS; Hochstedler JL; Ercoli C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Oct; 100(4):285-91. PubMed ID: 18922257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of accuracy of casts of multiple internal connection implant prosthesis obtained from different impression materials and techniques: an in vitro study.
    Pujari M; Garg P; Prithviraj DR
    J Oral Implantol; 2014 Apr; 40(2):137-45. PubMed ID: 24456531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of impression technique and implant angulation on the impression accuracy of external- and internal-connection implants.
    Mpikos P; Kafantaris N; Tortopidis D; Galanis C; Kaisarlis G; Koidis P
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(6):1422-8. PubMed ID: 23189292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of impressions of multiple implants in the edentulous arch: a systematic review.
    Baig MR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(4):869-80. PubMed ID: 25032767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Digital evaluation of the accuracy of impression techniques and materials in angulated implants.
    Kurtulmus-Yilmaz S; Ozan O; Ozcelik TB; Yagiz A
    J Dent; 2014 Dec; 42(12):1551-9. PubMed ID: 25446736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of implant angulation, connection length, and impression material on the dimensional accuracy of implant impressions: an in vitro comparative study.
    Sorrentino R; Gherlone EF; Calesini G; Zarone F
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 May; 12 Suppl 1():e63-76. PubMed ID: 19438937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An in vitro comparison of the accuracy of implant impressions with coded healing abutments and different implant angulations.
    Al-Abdullah K; Zandparsa R; Finkelman M; Hirayama H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Aug; 110(2):90-100. PubMed ID: 23929370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: an in vitro study.
    Lee H; Ercoli C; Funkenbusch PD; Feng C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 18262011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Full-arch implant fixed prostheses: a comparative study on the effect of connection type and impression technique on accuracy of fit.
    Papaspyridakos P; Hirayama H; Chen CJ; Ho CH; Chronopoulos V; Weber HP
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Sep; 27(9):1099-105. PubMed ID: 26374268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of implant impressions for partially and completely edentulous patients: a systematic review.
    Papaspyridakos P; Chen CJ; Gallucci GO; Doukoudakis A; Weber HP; Chronopoulos V
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(4):836-45. PubMed ID: 25032763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The accuracy of different dental impression techniques for implant-supported dental prostheses: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Flügge T; van der Meer WJ; Gonzalez BG; Vach K; Wismeijer D; Wang P
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Oct; 29 Suppl 16():374-392. PubMed ID: 30328182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of a digital impression system based on active wavefront sampling technology for implants considering operator experience, implant angulation, and depth.
    Giménez B; Özcan M; Martínez-Rus F; Pradíes G
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Jan; 17 Suppl 1():e54-64. PubMed ID: 23879869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Digital versus conventional implant impressions for edentulous patients: accuracy outcomes.
    Papaspyridakos P; Gallucci GO; Chen CJ; Hanssen S; Naert I; Vandenberghe B
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Apr; 27(4):465-72. PubMed ID: 25682892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy Comparison of Implant Impression Techniques: A Systematic Review.
    Moreira AH; Rodrigues NF; Pinho AC; Fonseca JC; Vilaça JL
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Oct; 17 Suppl 2():e751-64. PubMed ID: 25828851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of multi-unit implant impression: traditional techniques versus a digital procedure.
    Menini M; Setti P; Pera F; Pera P; Pesce P
    Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Apr; 22(3):1253-1262. PubMed ID: 28965251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Implant Impression Techniques for the Edentulous Jaw: A Summary of Three Studies.
    Stimmelmayr M; Beuer F; Edelhoff D; Güth JF
    J Prosthodont; 2016 Feb; 25(2):146-50. PubMed ID: 26032581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Internal vs. external connections for abutments/reconstructions: a systematic review.
    Gracis S; Michalakis K; Vigolo P; Vult von Steyern P; Zwahlen M; Sailer I
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Oct; 23 Suppl 6():202-16. PubMed ID: 23062143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the accuracy of three techniques used for multiple implant abutment impressions.
    Vigolo P; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 12616240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Effect of Implant Angulation on the Transfer Accuracy of External-Connection Implants.
    Alikhasi M; Siadat H; Rahimian S
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Aug; 17(4):822-9. PubMed ID: 24299654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of impressions and casts using different implant impression techniques in a multi-implant system with an internal hex connection.
    Wenz HJ; Hertrampf K
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 18416411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.