These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

443 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18922257)

  • 41. Three-dimensional accuracy of implant and abutment level impression techniques: effect on marginal discrepancy.
    Alikhasi M; Siadat H; Monzavi A; Momen-Heravi F
    J Oral Implantol; 2011 Dec; 37(6):649-57. PubMed ID: 20594060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Accuracy of impression scanning compared with stone casts of implant impressions.
    Matta RE; Adler W; Wichmann M; Heckmann SM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Apr; 117(4):507-512. PubMed ID: 27881327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The influence of implant placement depth and impression material on the stability of an open tray impression coping.
    Linkevicius T; Svediene O; Vindasiute E; Puisys A; Linkeviciene L
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Oct; 108(4):238-43. PubMed ID: 23031730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Accuracy of impressions with different impression materials in angulated implants.
    Reddy S; Prasad K; Vakil H; Jain A; Chowdhary R
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2013; 16(3):279-84. PubMed ID: 23771446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Evaluation of the accuracy of implant-level impression techniques for internal-connection implant prostheses in parallel and divergent models.
    Choi JH; Lim YJ; Yim SH; Kim CW
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):761-8. PubMed ID: 17974110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Effects of implant angulation, impression material, and variation in arch curvature width on implant transfer model accuracy.
    Akalin ZF; Ozkan YK; Ekerim A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(1):149-57. PubMed ID: 23377060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Critical appraisal of implant impression accuracies: A systematic review.
    Kim JH; Kim KR; Kim S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Aug; 114(2):185-92.e1. PubMed ID: 25935089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Comparative surface detail reproduction for elastomeric impression materials: Study on reproducibility performance.
    Varvara G; Sinjari B; Bernardi S; Turkyilmaz I; Malvezzi V; Piattelli M; Caputi S
    J Biol Regul Homeost Agents; 2021; 35(1):161-169. PubMed ID: 33435664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Clinical trial investigating success rates for polyether and vinyl polysiloxane impressions made with full-arch and dual-arch plastic trays.
    Johnson GH; Mancl LA; Schwedhelm ER; Verhoef DR; Lepe X
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jan; 103(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 20105676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Comparison of Different Impression Techniques When Using the All-on-Four Implant Treatment Protocol.
    Siadat H; Alikhasi M; Beyabanaki E; Rahimian S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(3):265-70. PubMed ID: 27148987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. A comparative study of the accuracy between plastic and metal impression transfer copings for implant restorations.
    Fernandez MA; Paez de Mendoza CY; Platt JA; Levon JA; Hovijitra ST; Nimmo A
    J Prosthodont; 2013 Jul; 22(5):367-76. PubMed ID: 23387412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The effect of splint material rigidity in implant impression techniques.
    Del Acqua MA; Chavez AM; Castanharo SM; Compagnoni MA; Mollo Fde A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(6):1153-8. PubMed ID: 21197492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Effect of splinted and nonsplinted impression techniques on the accuracy of fit of fixed implant prostheses in edentulous patients: a comparative study.
    Papaspyridakos P; Lal K; White GS; Weber HP; Gallucci GO
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(6):1267-72. PubMed ID: 22167432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Does Splinting the Direct Copings Increase the Impression Accuracy of Two-Unit Nonparallel Implant Restorations? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Ma Y; Al-Radhi RYZ; Jiang L; Yu H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(4):653-659. PubMed ID: 35904821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Comparative evaluation of impression accuracy of tilted and straight implants in All-on-Four technique.
    Ehsani S; Siadat H; Alikhasi M
    Implant Dent; 2014 Apr; 23(2):225-30. PubMed ID: 24614881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Impression techniques and misfit-induced strains on implant-supported superstructures: an in vitro study.
    Cehreli MC; Akça K
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2006 Aug; 26(4):379-85. PubMed ID: 16939020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. In Vitro Implant Impression Accuracy Using a New Photopolymerizing SDR Splinting Material.
    Di Fiore A; Meneghello R; Savio G; Sivolella S; Katsoulis J; Stellini E
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Oct; 17 Suppl 2():e721-9. PubMed ID: 25782045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Effects of impression levels and trays on the accuracy of impressions taken from angulated implants.
    Geramipanah F; Sahebi M; Davari M; Hajimahmoudi M; Rakhshan V
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Sep; 26(9):1098-105. PubMed ID: 24934081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Accuracy of various impression materials and methods for two implant systems: An effect size study.
    Schmidt A; Häussling T; Rehmann P; Schaaf H; Wöstmann B
    J Prosthodont Res; 2018 Apr; 62(2):245-251. PubMed ID: 29191609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Digital versus conventional implant impressions for partially edentulous arches: An evaluation of accuracy.
    Marghalani A; Weber HP; Finkelman M; Kudara Y; El Rafie K; Papaspyridakos P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Apr; 119(4):574-579. PubMed ID: 28927923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.