149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18923224)
1. A study of cephalometric appraisal of the inheritance of craniofacial pattern in Gorkhas.
Mehta OP; Gupta DS
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2008 Sep; 26(3):121-4. PubMed ID: 18923224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Facial height in Japanese-Brazilian descendants with normal occlusion.
Vieira FP; Pinzan A; Janson G; Fernandes TM; Sathler RC; Henriques RP
Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(5):54-66. PubMed ID: 25715717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An ultrasonographic evaluation of masseter muscle thickness in different dentofacial patterns.
Rohila AK; Sharma VP; Shrivastav PK; Nagar A; Singh GP
Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(6):726-31. PubMed ID: 23649053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Craniofacial structure of Anatolian Turkish adults with normal occlusions and well-balanced faces.
Basciftci FA; Uysal T; Buyukerkmen A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Mar; 125(3):366-72. PubMed ID: 15014417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Differences in craniofacial characteristics in Southern Italian children from Naples: a retrospective study by cephalometric analysis.
Perillo L; Isola G; Esercizio D; Iovane M; Triolo G; Matarese G
Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2013 Sep; 14(3):195-8. PubMed ID: 24295003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Forensic norms of female and male Lebanese adults.
Ayoub F; Yehia M; Rizk A; Al-Tannir M; Abi-Farah A; Hamadeh G
J Forensic Odontostomatol; 2008 Jun; 26(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 22689353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Smile analysis in different facial patterns and its correlation with underlying hard tissues.
Grover N; Kapoor DN; Verma S; Bharadwaj P
Prog Orthod; 2015; 16():28. PubMed ID: 26341345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Visualization of individual growth-related craniofacial changes based on cephalometric landmark data: a pilot study.
Lux CJ; Starke J; Rübel J; Stellzig A; Komposch G
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2002 May; 39(3):341-52. PubMed ID: 12019012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Association between facial growth pattern and facial muscle activity: A prospective cross-sectional study.
Alabdullah M; Saltaji H; Abou-Hamed H; Youssef M
Int Orthod; 2015 Jun; 13(2):181-194. PubMed ID: 25986702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Growth modulation using functional appliances--cephalometric predictors of successful response.
Kumar SA; Shetty KS; Prakash AT
Orthodontics (Chic.); 2013; 14(1):e50-9. PubMed ID: 23646338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Craniofacial morphological characteristics of Chinese adults with normal occlusion and different skeletal divergence.
Xiao D; Gao H; Ren Y
Eur J Orthod; 2011 Apr; 33(2):198-204. PubMed ID: 20841315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Craniofacial parameters of Syrian children with β-thalassemia major.
Takriti M; Dashash M
J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 May; 2(2):135-43. PubMed ID: 25426607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of craniofacial growth of untreated Class I and Class II girls from ages 9 to 18 years: a longitudinal study.
Yoon SS; Chung CH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Feb; 147(2):190-6. PubMed ID: 25636552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Palestinians norms of Steiner cephalometric analysis.
Hussien E; Al-Khateeb S; Mowais MA
World J Orthod; 2010; 11(4):e5-9. PubMed ID: 21490988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cephalometric norms of a Burkina Faso population.
Ouédraogo Y; Benyahia H; Diouf JS; Camara T; Bationo R; Ngom PI
Int Orthod; 2019 Mar; 17(1):136-142. PubMed ID: 30772356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cephalometric superimpositions.
Gu Y; McNamara JA
Angle Orthod; 2008 Nov; 78(6):967-76. PubMed ID: 18947269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of mandibular characteristics in patients affected with β-thalassaemia major: A retrospective case-control study.
Movahhedian N; Akbarizadeh F; Khojastepour L; Sardarian AR; Pakshir HR; Ahrari F
Int Orthod; 2020 Dec; 18(4):776-783. PubMed ID: 32768291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Variability of the cranial and dental phenotype in Williams syndrome.
Axelsson S
Swed Dent J Suppl; 2005; (170):3-67. PubMed ID: 15762376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Soft and hard tissue changes after bimaxillary surgery in Turkish female Class III patients.
Marşan G; Cura N; Emekli U
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 37(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 18786833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Determination of craniofacial relation among the subethnic Indian population: a modified approach - (Sagittal relation).
Felicita AS; Chandrasekar S; Shanthasundari KK
Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):305-12. PubMed ID: 23059564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
