These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18923224)

  • 21. Masseter muscle thickness in different skeletal morphology: an ultrasonographic study.
    Rani S; Ravi MS
    Indian J Dent Res; 2010; 21(3):402-7. PubMed ID: 20930353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Cephalometric floating norms as a guide toward a harmonious individual craniofacial pattern among Filipinos.
    Sevilla-Naranjilla MA; Rudzki-Janson I
    Angle Orthod; 2009 Nov; 79(6):1162-8. PubMed ID: 19852610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Determination of vertical dimension of occlusion in dentate patients by cephalometric analysis--pilot study.
    Tavano KT; Seraidarian PI; de Oliveira DD; Jansen WC
    Gerodontology; 2012 Jun; 29(2):e297-305. PubMed ID: 21323984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. An investigation of mandibular morphology in subjects with different vertical facial growth patterns.
    Eröz UB; Ceylan I; Aydemir S
    Aust Orthod J; 2000 Mar; 16(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 11201956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Associations between the postural orientation of sella-nasion and skeletodental morphology.
    Showfety KJ; Vig PS; Matteson S; Phillips C
    Angle Orthod; 1987 Apr; 57(2):99-112. PubMed ID: 3473953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Floating norms for the ANB angle as guidance for clinical considerations.
    Järvinen S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1986 Nov; 90(5):383-7. PubMed ID: 3465233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Craniofacial adaptations induced by chincup therapy in Class III patients.
    Deguchi T; McNamara JA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Feb; 115(2):175-82. PubMed ID: 9971929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Dimensional variation of craniofacial structures in relation to changing masticatory-functional demands.
    Varrela J
    Eur J Orthod; 1992 Feb; 14(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 1563473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Perioral soft tissue evaluation of skeletal Class II Division 1: A lateral cephalometric study.
    Lee YJ; Park JT; Cha JY
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Sep; 148(3):405-13. PubMed ID: 26321338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Face height and tooth eruption in adults--a 20-year follow-up investigation.
    Forsberg CM; Eliasson S; Westergren H
    Eur J Orthod; 1991 Aug; 13(4):249-54. PubMed ID: 1915613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Craniofacial profile in Southern Chinese with hypodontia.
    Chan DW; Samman N; McMillan AS
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Jun; 31(3):300-5. PubMed ID: 19193707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Extracranial versus intracranial references in individual cephalometric analysis.
    Ozbek MM; Köklü A
    Br J Orthod; 1994 Aug; 21(3):259-63. PubMed ID: 7947580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Is it possible to use cross-sectional and vertical facial measurements to establish the shape of the mandibular arch?
    El Haje OA; Pompeo DD; Furtado GC; Rivera LM; Paranhos LR
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 Nov; 15(6):735-9. PubMed ID: 25825099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Relationship between cranial base and maxillofacial morphology.
    Kasai K; Moro T; Kanazawa E; Iwasawa T
    Eur J Orthod; 1995 Oct; 17(5):403-10. PubMed ID: 8529753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluating craniofacial asymmetry with digital cephalometric images and cone-beam computed tomography.
    de Moraes ME; Hollender LG; Chen CS; Moraes LC; Balducci I
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jun; 139(6):e523-31. PubMed ID: 21640864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Repositioning of the masseter muscle and its effect on skeletal growth.
    Bayram B; Uckan S; Cetinsahin A; Arman Ozcirpici A; Ozdemir H; Yazici C
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 May; 109(5):e1-5. PubMed ID: 20416512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Björk-Jarabak cephalometric analysis on CBCT synthesized cephalograms with different dentofacial sagittal skeletal patterns.
    Rodriguez-Cardenas YA; Arriola-Guillen LE; Flores-Mir C
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(6):46-53. PubMed ID: 25628079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Skeletal and dental changes following functional regulator therapy on class II patients.
    McNamara JA; Bookstein FL; Shaughnessy TG
    Am J Orthod; 1985 Aug; 88(2):91-110. PubMed ID: 3861103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Relationship between the curve of Spee and craniofacial variables: A regression analysis.
    Halimi A; Benyahia H; Azeroual MF; Bahije L; Zaoui F
    Int Orthod; 2018 Jun; 16(2):361-373. PubMed ID: 29685399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Skeletal and dentoalveolar changes concurrent to use of Twin Block appliance in class II division I cases with a deficient mandible: a cephalometric study.
    Sharma AK; Sachdev V; Singla A; Kirtaniya BC
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2012; 30(3):218-26. PubMed ID: 23263425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.