1040 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18923249)
1. Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation and delayed revascularization for myocardial infarction and shock in the absence of primary angioplasty: a treatment strategy with or without thrombolysis?
Drakos SG; Anastasiou-Nana MI; Terrovitis JV; Tsagalou EP; Kanakakis J; Ntalianis A; Lazaris N; Maroulidis G; Venetsanakos J; Bonios M; Nanas JN
Coron Artery Dis; 2008 Nov; 19(7):521-6. PubMed ID: 18923249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of thrombolytic therapy, with or without intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation, on 12-month survival in the SHOCK trial.
French JK; Feldman HA; Assmann SF; Sanborn T; Palmeri ST; Miller D; Boland J; Buller CE; Steingart R; Sleeper LA; Hochman JS;
Am Heart J; 2003 Nov; 146(5):804-10. PubMed ID: 14597928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Early revascularization in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. SHOCK Investigators. Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock.
Hochman JS; Sleeper LA; Webb JG; Sanborn TA; White HD; Talley JD; Buller CE; Jacobs AK; Slater JN; Col J; McKinlay SM; LeJemtel TH
N Engl J Med; 1999 Aug; 341(9):625-34. PubMed ID: 10460813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Changing practice patterns in the management of acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: elderly compared with younger patients.
Dzavík V; Burton JR; Kee C; Teo KK; Ignaszewski A; Lucas AR; Tymchak WJ
Can J Cardiol; 1998 Jul; 14(7):923-30. PubMed ID: 9706277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Primary angioplasty for cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction.
Calton R; Jaison TM; David T
Indian Heart J; 1999; 51(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 10327779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Functional status and quality of life after emergency revascularization for cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction.
Sleeper LA; Ramanathan K; Picard MH; Lejemtel TH; White HD; Dzavik V; Tormey D; Avis NE; Hochman JS;
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2005 Jul; 46(2):266-73. PubMed ID: 16022953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Survival of patients treated with intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation at a tertiary care center in Pakistan - patient characteristics and predictors of in-hospital mortality.
Jafary FH; Khan SA; Kumar H; Malik NF; Kazmi KA; Dhakam S; Shafquat A; Hameed A; Tai J; Nadeem N
BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2004 Dec; 4():22. PubMed ID: 15574201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of hospital mortality with intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation insertion before versus after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction.
Abdel-Wahab M; Saad M; Kynast J; Geist V; Sherif MA; Richardt G; Toelg R
Am J Cardiol; 2010 Apr; 105(7):967-71. PubMed ID: 20346314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Should patients in cardiogenic shock undergo rescue angioplasty after failed fibrinolysis: comparison of primary versus rescue angioplasty in cardiogenic shock patients.
Kunadian B; Vijayalakshmi K; Dunning J; Thornley AR; Sutton AG; Muir DF; Wright RA; Hall JA; de Belder MA
J Invasive Cardiol; 2007 May; 19(5):217-23. PubMed ID: 17476036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Short and intermediate term clinical outcome in patients with cardiogenic shock treated with aortic counterpulsation].
Fornaro G; Prando MD; Parodi F; Cordero G; Sansa M; Bongo AS; Campi A; Aralda D; Dellavesa P; Aina F; Lazzero M; Cernigliaro C
G Ital Cardiol; 1996 Dec; 26(12):1385-99. PubMed ID: 9162668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Outcomes of primary coronary angioplasty and angioplasty after initial thrombolysis in the treatment of 374 consecutive patients with acute myocardial infarction.
Poloński L; Gasior M; Wasilewski J; Wilczek K; Wnek A; Adamowicz-Czoch E; Sikora J; Lekston A; Zebik T; Gierlotka M; Wojnar R; Szkodziński J; Kondys M; Szyguła-Jurkiewicz B; Wołk R; Zembala M
Am Heart J; 2003 May; 145(5):855-61. PubMed ID: 12766744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Management of cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: The Henry Ford Hospital experience and review of the literature.
Moosvi AR; Gheorghiade M; Goldstein S; Khaja F
Henry Ford Hosp Med J; 1991; 39(3-4):240-4. PubMed ID: 1804830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Intraaortic balloon counterpulsation in the treatment of perioperative cardiogenic shock-complicated myocardial infarction during aortocoronary bypass surgery].
Eremenko AA; Ziuliaeva TP; Babaev MA; Molochnokov IO; Kolpakov PE
Anesteziol Reanimatol; 2005; (2):40-4. PubMed ID: 15938096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The use of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: data from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2.
Barron HV; Every NR; Parsons LS; Angeja B; Goldberg RJ; Gore JM; Chou TM;
Am Heart J; 2001 Jun; 141(6):933-9. PubMed ID: 11376306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does current treatment of cardiogenic shock complicating the acute coronary syndromes comply with guidelines?
Iakobishvili Z; Behar S; Boyko V; Battler A; Hasdai D
Am Heart J; 2005 Jan; 149(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 15660040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Early percutaneous intervention improves survival in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.
Guo L; Mai X; Deng J; Liu A; Bu L; Wang H
Kardiol Pol; 2008 Jul; 66(7):722-6; discussion 727-8. PubMed ID: 18690563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Transferring patients for direct coronary angioplasty: a retrospective analysis of 135 unselected patients with acute myocardial infarction.
Margheri M; Meucci F; Falai M; Comeglio M; Giglioli C; Chechi T; Bandini F; Fantini A; Idini R; Gensini GF
Ital Heart J; 2001 Dec; 2(12):921-6. PubMed ID: 11838340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of thrombolysis, intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation, and their combination in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: a report from the SHOCK Trial Registry. SHould we emergently revascularize Occluded Coronaries for cardiogenic shocK?
Sanborn TA; Sleeper LA; Bates ER; Jacobs AK; Boland J; French JK; Dens J; Dzavik V; Palmeri ST; Webb JG; Goldberger M; Hochman JS
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2000 Sep; 36(3 Suppl A):1123-9. PubMed ID: 10985715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Interhospital transfer for early revascularization in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock--a report from the SHould we revascularize Occluded Coronaries for cardiogenic shocK? (SHOCK) trial and registry.
Jeger RV; Tseng CH; Hochman JS; Bates ER
Am Heart J; 2006 Oct; 152(4):686-92. PubMed ID: 16996836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting after acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: results from the Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock (SHOCK) trial.
White HD; Assmann SF; Sanborn TA; Jacobs AK; Webb JG; Sleeper LA; Wong CK; Stewart JT; Aylward PE; Wong SC; Hochman JS
Circulation; 2005 Sep; 112(13):1992-2001. PubMed ID: 16186436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
