598 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18923316)
1. A biomechanical evaluation of three revision screw strategies for failed lateral mass fixation.
Hostin RA; Wu C; Perra JH; Polly DW; Akesen B; Wroblewski JM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Oct; 33(22):2415-21. PubMed ID: 18923316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical evaluation of cervical lateral mass fixation: a comparison of the Roy-Camille and Magerl screw techniques.
Barrey C; Mertens P; Rumelhart C; Cotton F; Jund J; Perrin G
J Neurosurg; 2004 Mar; 100(3 Suppl Spine):268-76. PubMed ID: 15029915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Flexion failure of posterior cervical lateral mass screws. Influence of insertion technique and position.
Choueka J; Spivak JM; Kummer FJ; Steger T
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1996 Feb; 21(4):462-8. PubMed ID: 8658250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Paravertebral foramen screw fixation for posterior cervical spine fusion: biomechanical study and description of a novel technique.
Maki S; Aramomi M; Matsuura Y; Furuya T; Ota M; Iijima Y; Saito J; Suzuki T; Mannoji C; Takahashi K; Yamazaki M; Koda M
J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Oct; 27(4):415-420. PubMed ID: 28498072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantitative anatomic evaluation of cervical lateral mass fixation with a comparison of the Roy-Camille and the Magerl screw techniques.
Barrey C; Mertens P; Jund J; Cotton F; Perrin G
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Mar; 30(6):E140-7. PubMed ID: 15770166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. C1 pedicle screws versus C1 lateral mass screws: comparisons of pullout strengths and biomechanical stabilities.
Ma XY; Yin QS; Wu ZH; Xia H; Liu JF; Xiang M; Zhao WD; Zhong SZ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Feb; 34(4):371-7. PubMed ID: 19214096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Insertional Torque in Cervical Vertebrae Lateral Mass Screw Fixation: Magerl Technique Versus Roy-Camille Technique.
Shinohara A; Sairyo K; Mishiro T; Chikawa T; Soshi S
Clin Spine Surg; 2017 Oct; 30(8):E1156-E1159. PubMed ID: 27623298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Revision of cannulated and perforated cement-augmented pedicle screws: a biomechanical study in human cadavers.
Bullmann V; Schmoelz W; Richter M; Grathwohl C; Schulte TL
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Sep; 35(19):E932-9. PubMed ID: 20508553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Factors affecting the interface of cervical spine facet screws placed in the technique by Roy-Camille et al.
Pitzen TR; Zenner S; Barbier D; Georg T; Steudel WI
Eur Spine J; 2004 Oct; 13(6):524-9. PubMed ID: 15048563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantitative anatomy of subaxial cervical lateral mass: an analysis of safe screw lengths for Roy-Camille and magerl techniques.
Stemper BD; Marawar SV; Yoganandan N; Shender BS; Rao RD
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Apr; 33(8):893-7. PubMed ID: 18404109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Which salvage fixation technique is best for the failed initial screw fixation at the cervicothoracic junction? A biomechanical comparison study.
Hong JT; Tomoyuki T; Jain A; Orías AAE; Inoue N; An HS
Eur Spine J; 2017 Sep; 26(9):2417-2424. PubMed ID: 28752245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Tapping insertional torque allows prediction for better pedicle screw fixation and optimal screw size selection.
Helgeson MD; Kang DG; Lehman RA; Dmitriev AE; Luhmann SJ
Spine J; 2013 Aug; 13(8):957-65. PubMed ID: 23602374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Salvage of C2 pedicle and pars screws using the intralaminar technique: a biomechanical analysis.
Lehman RA; Dmitriev AE; Helgeson MD; Sasso RC; Kuklo TR; Riew KD
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Apr; 33(9):960-5. PubMed ID: 18427316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Using lamina screws as a salvage technique at C-7: computed tomography and biomechanical analysis using cadaveric vertebrae. Laboratory investigation.
Cardoso MJ; Dmitriev AE; Helgeson MD; Stephens F; Campbell V; Lehman RA; Cooper P; Rosner MK
J Neurosurg Spine; 2009 Jul; 11(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 19569937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanical Fixation Properties of the Cortical Bone Trajectory in the Osteoporotic Lumbar Spine.
Li HM; Zhang RJ; Gao H; Jia CY; Xing T; Zhang JX; Dong FL; Shen CL
World Neurosurg; 2018 Nov; 119():e717-e727. PubMed ID: 30092463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pedicle screw fixation strength: pullout versus insertional torque.
Inceoglu S; Ferrara L; McLain RF
Spine J; 2004; 4(5):513-8. PubMed ID: 15363421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cervical pedicle screws vs. lateral mass screws: uniplanar fatigue analysis and residual pullout strengths.
Johnston TL; Karaikovic EE; Lautenschlager EP; Marcu D
Spine J; 2006; 6(6):667-72. PubMed ID: 17088197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Acute and long-term stability of atlantoaxial fixation methods: a biomechanical comparison of pars, pedicle, and intralaminar fixation in an intact and odontoid fracture model.
Dmitriev AE; Lehman RA; Helgeson MD; Sasso RC; Kuhns C; Riew DK
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Feb; 34(4):365-70. PubMed ID: 19214095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Insertion torque and pullout force of rescue screws for anterior cervical plate fixation in a fatigued initial pilot hole.
Pitzen T; Franta F; Barbier D; Steudel WI
J Neurosurg Spine; 2004 Sep; 1(2):198-201. PubMed ID: 15347006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Straight-forward versus anatomic trajectory technique of thoracic pedicle screw fixation: a biomechanical analysis.
Lehman RA; Polly DW; Kuklo TR; Cunningham B; Kirk KL; Belmont PJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Sep; 28(18):2058-65. PubMed ID: 14501914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
