These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18923984)

  • 1. Variation in preferred gain with experience for hearing-aid users.
    Keidser G; O'Brien A; Carter L; McLelland M; Yeend I
    Int J Audiol; 2008 Oct; 47(10):621-35. PubMed ID: 18923984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Better fitting of cochlear implants: modeling loudness for acoustic and electric stimuli.
    McDermott H; Varsavsky A
    J Neural Eng; 2009 Dec; 6(6):065007. PubMed ID: 19850972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparing NAL-NL1 and DSL v5 in Hearing Aids Fit to Children with Severe or Profound Hearing Loss: Goodness of Fit-to-Targets, Impacts on Predicted Loudness and Speech Intelligibility.
    Ching TY; Quar TK; Johnson EE; Newall P; Sharma M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Mar; 26(3):260-74. PubMed ID: 25751694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The design and evaluation of a hearing aid with trainable amplification parameters.
    Zakis JA; Dillon H; McDermott HJ
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):812-30. PubMed ID: 17982368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparing loudness normalization (IHAFF) with speech intelligibility maximization (NAL-NL1) when implemented in a two-channel device.
    Keidser G; Grant F
    Ear Hear; 2001 Dec; 22(6):501-15. PubMed ID: 11770672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Is normal or less than normal overall loudness preferred by first-time hearing aid users?
    Smeds K
    Ear Hear; 2004 Apr; 25(2):159-72. PubMed ID: 15064661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using trainable hearing aids to examine real-world preferred gain.
    Mueller HG; Hornsby BW; Weber JE
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2008; 19(10):758-73. PubMed ID: 19358456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparisons of quality ratings for music by cochlear implant and hearing aid users.
    Looi V; McDermott H; McKay C; Hickson L
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2 Suppl):59S-61S. PubMed ID: 17496649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Providing an internet-based audiological counselling programme to new hearing aid users: a qualitative study.
    Laplante-Lévesque A; Pichora-Fuller MK; Gagné JP
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Dec; 45(12):697-706. PubMed ID: 17132558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A cross-over, double-blind comparison of the NAL-NL1 and the DSL v4.1 prescriptions for children with mild to moderately severe hearing loss.
    Ching TY; Scollie SD; Dillon H; Seewald R
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Jan; 49 Suppl 1():S4-15. PubMed ID: 20109088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of the base line response on self-adjustments of hearing aid gain.
    Keidser G; Dillon H; Convery E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Sep; 124(3):1668-81. PubMed ID: 19045657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Personality, hearing problems, and amplification characteristics: contributions to self-report hearing aid outcomes.
    Cox RM; Alexander GC; Gray GA
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):141-62. PubMed ID: 17496667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The auditory acclimatization effect in sensorineural hearing-impaired listeners: evidence for functional plasticity.
    Philibert B; Collet L; Vesson JF; Veuillet E
    Hear Res; 2005 Jul; 205(1-2):131-42. PubMed ID: 15953523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of the desired sensation level [input/output] algorithm for adults with hearing loss: the acceptable range for amplified conversational speech.
    Jenstad LM; Bagatto MP; Seewald RC; Scollie SD; Cornelisse LE; Scicluna R
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):793-811. PubMed ID: 17982367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development of a hearing aid self-efficacy questionnaire.
    West RL; Smith SL
    Int J Audiol; 2007 Dec; 46(12):759-71. PubMed ID: 18049965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. NAL-NL1 procedure for fitting nonlinear hearing aids: characteristics and comparisons with other procedures.
    Byrne D; Dillon H; Ching T; Katsch R; Keidser G
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2001 Jan; 12(1):37-51. PubMed ID: 11214977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Preliminary evidence of asymmetry in uncomfortable loudness levels after unilateral hearing aid experience: evidence of functional plasticity in the adult auditory system.
    Munro KJ; Trotter JH
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Dec; 45(12):684-8. PubMed ID: 17132556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prescribed real-ear and achieved real-life differences in children's hearing aids adjusted according to the NAL-NL1 and the DSL v.4.1 prescriptions.
    Ching TY; Scollie SD; Dillon H; Seewald R; Britton L; Steinberg J
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Jan; 49 Suppl 1():S16-25. PubMed ID: 20109083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Listener Factors Explain Little Variability in Self-Adjusted Hearing Aid Gain.
    Perry TT; Nelson PB; Van Tasell DJ
    Trends Hear; 2019; 23():2331216519837124. PubMed ID: 30880645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of variations in hearing-aid frequency response on real-life functional performance of children with severe or profound hearing loss.
    Ching TY; Hill M; Dillon H
    Int J Audiol; 2008 Aug; 47(8):461-75. PubMed ID: 18698522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.