These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18925606)

  • 1. Real-time ultrasound vs. evaluation of static images in the preoperative assessment of adnexal masses.
    Van Holsbeke C; Yazbek J; Holland TK; Daemen A; De Moor B; Testa AC; Valentin L; Jurkovic D; Timmerman D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Nov; 32(6):828-31. PubMed ID: 18925606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prospective cross-validation of Doppler ultrasound examination and gray-scale ultrasound imaging for discrimination of benign and malignant pelvic masses.
    Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Oct; 14(4):273-83. PubMed ID: 10586480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Which extrauterine pelvic masses are difficult to correctly classify as benign or malignant on the basis of ultrasound findings and is there a way of making a correct diagnosis?
    Valentin L; Ameye L; Jurkovic D; Metzger U; Lécuru F; Van Huffel S; Timmerman D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Apr; 27(4):438-44. PubMed ID: 16526098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Adding a single CA 125 measurement to ultrasound imaging performed by an experienced examiner does not improve preoperative discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses.
    Valentin L; Jurkovic D; Van Calster B; Testa A; Van Holsbeke C; Bourne T; Vergote I; Van Huffel S; Timmerman D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Sep; 34(3):345-54. PubMed ID: 19585547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical and ultrasound characteristics of surgically removed adnexal lesions with largest diameter ≤ 2.5 cm: a pictorial essay.
    Di Legge A; Pollastri P; Mancari R; Ludovisi M; Mascilini F; Franchi D; Jurkovic D; Coccia ME; Timmerman D; Scambia G; Testa A; Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov; 50(5):648-656. PubMed ID: 28004457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Simple ultrasound-based rules for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer.
    Timmerman D; Testa AC; Bourne T; Ameye L; Jurkovic D; Van Holsbeke C; Paladini D; Van Calster B; Vergote I; Van Huffel S; Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jun; 31(6):681-90. PubMed ID: 18504770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses by specialist ultrasound examination versus serum CA-125.
    Van Calster B; Timmerman D; Bourne T; Testa AC; Van Holsbeke C; Domali E; Jurkovic D; Neven P; Van Huffel S; Valentin L
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Nov; 99(22):1706-14. PubMed ID: 18000221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adnexal masses difficult to classify as benign or malignant using subjective assessment of gray-scale and Doppler ultrasound findings: logistic regression models do not help.
    Valentin L; Ameye L; Savelli L; Fruscio R; Leone FP; Czekierdowski A; Lissoni AA; Fischerova D; Guerriero S; Van Holsbeke C; Van Huffel S; Timmerman D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Oct; 38(4):456-65. PubMed ID: 21520475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intra- and interobserver agreement when describing adnexal masses using the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis terms and definitions: a study on three-dimensional ultrasound volumes.
    Sladkevicius P; Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Mar; 41(3):318-27. PubMed ID: 22915506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ultrasound experience substantially impacts on diagnostic performance and confidence when adnexal masses are classified using pattern recognition.
    Van Holsbeke C; Daemen A; Yazbek J; Holland TK; Bourne T; Mesens T; Lannoo L; Boes AS; Joos A; Van De Vijver A; Roggen N; de Moor B; de Jonge E; Testa AC; Valentin L; Jurkovic D; Timmerman D
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2010; 69(3):160-8. PubMed ID: 20016188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prospective external validation of the 'ovarian crescent sign' as a single ultrasound parameter to distinguish between benign and malignant adnexal pathology.
    Van Holsbeke C; Van Belle V; Leone FP; Guerriero S; Paladini D; Melis GB; Greggi S; Fischerova D; De Jonge E; Neven P; Bourne T; Valentin L; Van Huffel S; Timmerman D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Jul; 36(1):81-7. PubMed ID: 20217895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Performance of three-dimensional power Doppler angiography as third-step assessment in differential diagnosis of adnexal masses.
    Utrilla-Layna J; Alcázar JL; Aubá M; Laparte C; Olartecoechea B; Errasti T; Juez L; Mínguez JÁ; Guerriero S; Jurado M
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 May; 45(5):613-7. PubMed ID: 25270368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A scoring system to differentiate malignant from benign masses in specific ultrasound-based subgroups of adnexal tumors.
    Ameye L; Valentin L; Testa AC; Van Holsbeke C; Domali E; Van Huffel S; Vergote I; Bourne T; Timmerman D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Jan; 33(1):92-101. PubMed ID: 19090501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Power Doppler vascularity index for predicting malignancy of adnexal masses.
    Marret H; Sauget S; Giraudeau B; Body G; Tranquart F
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 May; 25(5):508-13. PubMed ID: 15846763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal ultrasound examination for assigning a specific diagnosis to adnexal masses.
    Sokalska A; Timmerman D; Testa AC; Van Holsbeke C; Lissoni AA; Leone FP; Jurkovic D; Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Oct; 34(4):462-70. PubMed ID: 19685552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Three-dimensional volume off-line analysis as compared to real-time ultrasound for assessing adnexal masses.
    Alcázar JL; Iturra A; Sedda F; Aubá M; Ajossa S; Guerriero S; Jurado M
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 Mar; 161(1):92-5. PubMed ID: 22197306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Vessel morphology depicted by three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound as second-stage test in adnexal tumors that are difficult to classify: prospective diagnostic accuracy study.
    Sladkevicius P; Jokubkiene L; Timmerman D; Fischerova D; Van Holsbeke C; Franchi D; Savelli L; Epstein E; Fruscio R; Kaijser J; Czekierdowski A; Guerriero S; Pascual MA; Testa AC; Ameye L; Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Feb; 57(2):324-334. PubMed ID: 32853459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ultrasound methods to distinguish between malignant and benign adnexal masses in the hands of examiners with different levels of experience.
    Van Holsbeke C; Daemen A; Yazbek J; Holland TK; Bourne T; Mesens T; Lannoo L; De Moor B; De Jonge E; Testa AC; Valentin L; Jurkovic D; Timmerman D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Oct; 34(4):454-61. PubMed ID: 19736644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ovarian cancer prediction in adnexal masses using ultrasound-based logistic regression models: a temporal and external validation study by the IOTA group.
    Timmerman D; Van Calster B; Testa AC; Guerriero S; Fischerova D; Lissoni AA; Van Holsbeke C; Fruscio R; Czekierdowski A; Jurkovic D; Savelli L; Vergote I; Bourne T; Van Huffel S; Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Aug; 36(2):226-34. PubMed ID: 20455203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sonographic discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses in premenopause.
    Radosa MP; Vorwergk J; Fitzgerald J; Kaehler C; Schneider U; Camara O; Runnebaum IB; Schleußner E
    Ultraschall Med; 2014 Aug; 35(4):339-44. PubMed ID: 23775448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.