284 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18925932)
21. Longitudinal evaluation of tumor metastasis by an FDG-microPet/microCT dual-imaging modality in a lung carcinoma-bearing mouse model.
Chang CH; Jan ML; Fan KH; Wang HE; Tsai TH; Chen CF; Fu YK; Lee TW
Anticancer Res; 2006; 26(1A):159-66. PubMed ID: 16475693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. 18F-FPPRGD2 and 18F-FDG PET of response to Abraxane therapy.
Sun X; Yan Y; Liu S; Cao Q; Yang M; Neamati N; Shen B; Niu G; Chen X
J Nucl Med; 2011 Jan; 52(1):140-6. PubMed ID: 21149494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Multimodal evaluation of xenograft tumors in mice with an in-vivo stereo imaging system and small-animal PET/CT.
Lee O; Lee G; Kim M; Kim SK; Baek Y; Oh C
Melanoma Res; 2013 Oct; 23(5):349-59. PubMed ID: 23839076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Noninvasive Evaluation of Metabolic Tumor Volume in Lewis Lung Carcinoma Tumor-Bearing C57BL/6 Mice with Micro-PET and the Radiotracers 18F-Alfatide and 18F-FDG: A Comparative Analysis.
Wei YC; Hu X; Gao Y; Fu Z; Zhao W; Yu Q; Wang S; Zhu S; Li J; Yu J; Yuan S
PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0136195. PubMed ID: 26352404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Dynamic evaluation of 18F-FDG uptake by microPET and whole-body autoradiography in a fibrosarcoma-bearing mouse model.
Chang CH; Fan KH; Chen TJ; Hsu WC; Jan ML; Tsai TH; Kao PF; Chen CF; Fu YK; Lee TW
J Formos Med Assoc; 2004 Nov; 103(11):876-81. PubMed ID: 15549159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Volume of preclinical xenograft tumors is more accurately assessed by ultrasound imaging than manual caliper measurements.
Ayers GD; McKinley ET; Zhao P; Fritz JM; Metry RE; Deal BC; Adlerz KM; Coffey RJ; Manning HC
J Ultrasound Med; 2010 Jun; 29(6):891-901. PubMed ID: 20498463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Accuracy of a clinical PET/CT vs. a preclinical μPET system for monitoring treatment effects in tumour xenografts.
Palmowski K; Winz O; Rix A; Bzyl J; Behrendt FF; Verburg FA; Mottaghy FM; Palmowski M
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Aug; 82(8):1318-24. PubMed ID: 23452987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Tumor response assessment is more robust with sequential CT scanning than external caliper measurements.
Ishimori T; Tatsumi M; Wahl RL
Acad Radiol; 2005 Jun; 12(6):776-81. PubMed ID: 15935976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Characterization of an Orthotopic Colorectal Cancer Mouse Model and Its Feasibility for Accurate Quantification in Positron Emission Tomography.
Rapic S; Vangestel C; Verhaeghe J; Van den Wyngaert T; Hinz R; Verhoye M; Pauwels P; Staelens S; Stroobants S
Mol Imaging Biol; 2017 Oct; 19(5):762-771. PubMed ID: 28194632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Registration of [18F]FDG microPET and small-animal MRI.
Rowland DJ; Garbow JR; Laforest R; Snyder AZ
Nucl Med Biol; 2005 Aug; 32(6):567-72. PubMed ID: 16026703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. 18F-EF5 PET Is Predictive of Response to Fractionated Radiotherapy in Preclinical Tumor Models.
Ali R; Apte S; Vilalta M; Subbarayan M; Miao Z; Chin FT; Graves EE
PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0139425. PubMed ID: 26431331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Noninvasive tumor imaging with high-frequency ultrasound and microPET in small animals.
Liao AH; Hwang JJ; Li CH; Cheng WF; Li PC
Ultrason Imaging; 2007 Oct; 29(4):201-12. PubMed ID: 18481592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Usefulness of FDG-microPET for early evaluation of therapeutic effects on VX2 rabbit carcinoma.
Ishii K; Hosono MN; Wada Y; Maeda M; Kondo S; Takada Y; Tada T; Okamura T; Watanabe Y; Inoue Y
Ann Nucl Med; 2006 Feb; 20(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 16615421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Tumor measurement in the nude mouse.
Euhus DM; Hudd C; LaRegina MC; Johnson FE
J Surg Oncol; 1986 Apr; 31(4):229-34. PubMed ID: 3724177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. MicroCT liver contrast agent enhancement over time, dose, and mouse strain.
Suckow CE; Stout DB
Mol Imaging Biol; 2008; 10(2):114-20. PubMed ID: 18204990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Reproducibility of linear tumor measurements using PACS: comparison of caliper method with edge-tracing method.
Monsky WL; Raptopoulos V; Keogan MT; Doty D; Kamel I; Yam CS; Ransil BJ
Eur Radiol; 2004 Mar; 14(3):519-25. PubMed ID: 14658000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Estimation of rat mammary tumor volume using caliper and ultrasonography measurements.
Faustino-Rocha A; Oliveira PA; Pinho-Oliveira J; Teixeira-Guedes C; Soares-Maia R; da Costa RG; Colaço B; Pires MJ; Colaço J; Ferreira R; Ginja M
Lab Anim (NY); 2013 Jun; 42(6):217-24. PubMed ID: 23689461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Combined microPET/CT for imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma in mice.
von Falck C; Rodt T; Halter R; Spanel R; Galanski M; Borlak J
Front Biosci (Landmark Ed); 2009 Jan; 14(6):2193-202. PubMed ID: 19273193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of young clinical investigators' accuracy and reproducibility when measuring pulmonary and skin surface nodules using a circumferential measurement versus a standard caliper measurement: American Association for Cancer Research/American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Trials Workshop.
Monsky WL; Heddens DK; Clark GM; Von Hoff DD; Coltman CA; Dorr RT; Alberts DS
J Clin Oncol; 2000 Jan; 18(2):437-44. PubMed ID: 10637260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. PET probes for distinct metabolic pathways have different cell specificities during immune responses in mice.
Nair-Gill E; Wiltzius SM; Wei XX; Cheng D; Riedinger M; Radu CG; Witte ON
J Clin Invest; 2010 Jun; 120(6):2005-15. PubMed ID: 20484820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
