These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18926985)

  • 21. Modeling recall memory for emotional objects in Alzheimer's disease.
    Sundstrøm M
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2011 Jul; 18(4):396-413. PubMed ID: 21728888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Stereo disparity facilitates view generalization during shape recognition for solid multipart objects.
    Cristino F; Davitt L; Hayward WG; Leek EC
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(12):2419-36. PubMed ID: 25679983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Repetition priming and the haptic recognition of familiar and unfamiliar objects.
    Craddock M; Lawson R
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Oct; 70(7):1350-65. PubMed ID: 18927018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Viewpoint dependence and object discriminability.
    Hayward WG; Williams P
    Psychol Sci; 2000 Jan; 11(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 11228847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Object recognition without knowledge of object orientation.
    Turnbull OH; Laws KR; McCarthy RA
    Cortex; 1995 Jun; 31(2):387-95. PubMed ID: 7555015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Multiple routes to object matching from different viewpoints: mental rotation versus invariant features.
    Vanrie J; Willems B; Wagemans J
    Perception; 2001; 30(9):1047-56. PubMed ID: 11694082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Object representations for multiple visual categories overlap in lateral occipital and medial fusiform cortex.
    Pourtois G; Schwartz S; Spiridon M; Martuzzi R; Vuilleumier P
    Cereb Cortex; 2009 Aug; 19(8):1806-19. PubMed ID: 19015371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. What object attributes determine canonical views?
    Blanz V; Tarr MJ; Bülthoff HH
    Perception; 1999; 28(5):575-99. PubMed ID: 10664755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. No evidence for feature overwriting in visual working memory.
    Jünger E; Kliegl R; Oberauer K
    Memory; 2014; 22(4):374-89. PubMed ID: 23663040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Adaptive memory: Animacy enhances free recall but impairs cued recall.
    Popp EY; Serra MJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Feb; 42(2):186-201. PubMed ID: 26375781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Canonical views of dynamic scenes.
    Garsoffky B; Schwan S; Huff M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Feb; 35(1):17-27. PubMed ID: 19170467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Recognition memory impairments caused by false recognition of novel objects.
    Yeung LK; Ryan JD; Cowell RA; Barense MD
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2013 Nov; 142(4):1384-97. PubMed ID: 23937183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The potentiation of two components of the reach-to-grasp action during object categorisation in visual memory.
    Derbyshire N; Ellis R; Tucker M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 May; 122(1):74-98. PubMed ID: 16376844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Rat spatial memory tasks adapted for humans: characterization in subjects with intact brain and subjects with selective medial temporal lobe thermal lesions.
    Bohbot VD; Jech R; Růzicka E; Nadel L; Kalina M; Stepánková K; Bures J
    Physiol Res; 2002; 51 Suppl 1():S49-65. PubMed ID: 12479786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Intrinsic frames of reference and egocentric viewpoints in scene recognition.
    Mou W; Fan Y; McNamara TP; Owen CB
    Cognition; 2008 Feb; 106(2):750-69. PubMed ID: 17540353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The Virtual Tray of Objects Task as a novel method to electrophysiologically measure visuo-spatial recognition memory.
    Amico F; Ambrosini E; Guillem F; Mento G; Power D; Pergola G; Vallesi A
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2015 Dec; 98(3 Pt 1):477-89. PubMed ID: 26546862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Object recognition under sequential viewing conditions: evidence for viewpoint-specific recognition procedures.
    Lawson R; Humphreys GW; Watson DG
    Perception; 1994; 23(5):595-614. PubMed ID: 7800472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Congruency effect of presentation modality on false recognition of haptic and visual objects.
    Nabeta T; Kawahara J
    Memory; 2006 Apr; 14(3):307-15. PubMed ID: 16574587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Where vision meets memory: prefrontal-posterior networks for visual object constancy during categorization and recognition.
    Schendan HE; Stern CE
    Cereb Cortex; 2008 Jul; 18(7):1695-711. PubMed ID: 18033768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Rigid and nonrigid objects in canonical and noncanonical views: hemisphere-specific effects on object identification.
    Laeng B; Carlesimo GA; Caltagirone C; Miceli G
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2002 Dec; 19(8):697-720. PubMed ID: 20957560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.