These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18927024)

  • 1. Putting the psychology back into psychological models: mechanistic versus rational approaches.
    Sakamoto Y; Jones M; Love BC
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Sep; 36(6):1057-65. PubMed ID: 18927024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Failure to find evidence of stimulus generalization within pictorial categories in pigeons.
    Sutton JE; Roberts WA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2002 Nov; 78(3):333-43. PubMed ID: 12507007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How many exemplars are used? Explorations with the Rex Leopold I model.
    De Schryver M; Vandist K; Rosseel Y
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Apr; 16(2):337-43. PubMed ID: 19293104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Experience-based and on-line categorization of objects in early infancy.
    Bornstein MH; Mash C
    Child Dev; 2010; 81(3):884-97. PubMed ID: 20573111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hierarchical encoding in visual working memory: ensemble statistics bias memory for individual items.
    Brady TF; Alvarez GA
    Psychol Sci; 2011 Mar; 22(3):384-92. PubMed ID: 21296808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Two pathways to stimulus encoding in category learning?
    Davis T; Love BC; Maddox WT
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Jun; 37(4):394-413. PubMed ID: 19460948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Adaptive categorization in unsupervised learning.
    Clapper JP; Bower GH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Sep; 28(5):908-923. PubMed ID: 12219798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. What does it look like and what can it do? Category structure influences how infants categorize.
    Horst JS; Oakes LM; Madole KL
    Child Dev; 2005; 76(3):614-31. PubMed ID: 15892782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Learning rule-described and non-rule-described categories: a comparison of children and adults.
    Minda JP; Desroches AS; Church BA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1518-33. PubMed ID: 18980411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of category variability in perceptual categorization.
    Stewart N; Chater N
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Sep; 28(5):893-907. PubMed ID: 12219797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Recency effects as a window to generalization: separating decisional and perceptual sequential effects in category learning.
    Jones M; Love BC; Maddox WT
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Mar; 32(2):316-32. PubMed ID: 16569149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimating stimuli from contrasting categories: truncation due to boundaries.
    Huttenlocher J; Hedges LV; Lourenco SF; Crawford LE; Corrigan B
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2007 Aug; 136(3):502-19. PubMed ID: 17696696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Two-stimulus--two choice paradigm for psychophysics: range-frequency model and adaptation level theory in comparison].
    Sander K; Sarris V
    Z Exp Psychol; 1997; 44(3):431-46. PubMed ID: 9522678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Brief communication: the role of category structure in determining the effects of stimulus preexposure on categorization accuracy.
    Wills AJ; Suret M; McLaren IP
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2004 Jan; 57(1):79-88. PubMed ID: 14690850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of frequency of feedback on transfer in concept identification.
    Schroth ML
    Am J Psychol; 1997; 110(1):71-9. PubMed ID: 9100341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Response times seen as decompression times in Boolean concept use.
    Bradmetz J; Mathy F
    Psychol Res; 2008 Mar; 72(2):211-34. PubMed ID: 17093950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Eyetracking and selective attention in category learning.
    Rehder B; Hoffman AB
    Cogn Psychol; 2005 Aug; 51(1):1-41. PubMed ID: 16039934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Combining exemplar-based category representations and connectionist learning rules.
    Nosofsky RM; Kruschke JK; McKinley SC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1992 Mar; 18(2):211-33. PubMed ID: 1532819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Conceptual penetration of visual processing.
    Lupyan G; Thompson-Schill SL; Swingley D
    Psychol Sci; 2010 May; 21(5):682-91. PubMed ID: 20483847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mental representation in visual/haptic crossmodal memory: evidence from interference effects.
    Lacey S; Campbell C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Feb; 59(2):361-76. PubMed ID: 16618639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.