These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18927030)

  • 1. Effects of grammar complexity on artificial grammar learning.
    van den Bos E; Poletiek FH
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Sep; 36(6):1122-31. PubMed ID: 18927030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Independent judgment-linked and motor-linked forms of artificial grammar learning.
    Seger CA
    Conscious Cogn; 1998 Jun; 7(2):259-84. PubMed ID: 9690029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Learning simple and complex artificial grammars in the presence of a semantic reference field: effects on performance and awareness.
    Van den Bos E; Poletiek FH
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():158. PubMed ID: 25745408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The conscious, the unconscious, and familiarity.
    Scott RB; Dienes Z
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Sep; 34(5):1264-88. PubMed ID: 18763904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Implicit learning and reading: insights from typical children and children with developmental dyslexia using the artificial grammar learning (AGL) paradigm.
    Pavlidou EV; Williams JM
    Res Dev Disabil; 2014 Jul; 35(7):1457-72. PubMed ID: 24751907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Learning artificial grammars: no evidence for the acquisition of rules.
    Kinder A; Assmann A
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Dec; 28(8):1321-32. PubMed ID: 11219960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Instruction effects in implicit artificial grammar learning: a preference for grammaticality.
    Forkstam C; Elwér A; Ingvar M; Petersson KM
    Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1221():80-92. PubMed ID: 18561897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prior familiarity with components enhances unconscious learning of relations.
    Scott RB; Dienes Z
    Conscious Cogn; 2010 Mar; 19(1):413-8. PubMed ID: 20096605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intact implicit learning in schizophrenia.
    Danion JM; Meulemans T; Kauffmann-Muller F; Vermaat H
    Am J Psychiatry; 2001 Jun; 158(6):944-8. PubMed ID: 11384904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Information theory and artificial grammar learning: inferring grammaticality from redundancy.
    Jamieson RK; Nevzorova U; Lee G; Mewhort DJ
    Psychol Res; 2016 Mar; 80(2):195-211. PubMed ID: 25828458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intentional control based on familiarity in artificial grammar learning.
    Wan L; Dienes Z; Fu X
    Conscious Cogn; 2008 Dec; 17(4):1209-18. PubMed ID: 18667335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Concurrence of rule- and similarity-based mechanisms in artificial grammar learning.
    Opitz B; Hofmann J
    Cogn Psychol; 2015 Mar; 77():77-99. PubMed ID: 25767052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of feedback in implicit and explicit artificial grammar learning: a comparison between dyslexic and non-dyslexic adults.
    Schiff R; Sasson A; Star G; Kahta S
    Ann Dyslexia; 2017 Oct; 67(3):333-355. PubMed ID: 29134484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Implicit learning of recursive context-free grammars.
    Rohrmeier M; Fu Q; Dienes Z
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(10):e45885. PubMed ID: 23094021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Implicit learning of two artificial grammars.
    Guillemin C; Tillmann B
    Cogn Process; 2021 Feb; 22(1):141-150. PubMed ID: 33021732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Learning of pitch and time structures in an artificial grammar setting.
    Prince JB; Stevens CJ; Jones MR; Tillmann B
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Aug; 44(8):1201-1214. PubMed ID: 29648867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Structural selection in implicit learning of artificial grammars.
    van den Bos E; Poletiek FH
    Psychol Res; 2010 Mar; 74(2):138-51. PubMed ID: 19212781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Transfer and Complexity in Artificial Grammar Learning.
    Gomez RL
    Cogn Psychol; 1997 Jul; 33(2):154-207. PubMed ID: 9245469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Implicit and explicit knowledge bases in artificial grammar learning.
    Dienes Z; Broadbent D; Berry D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1991 Sep; 17(5):875-87. PubMed ID: 1834769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Strengthening the case for stimulus-specificity in artificial grammar learning: no evidence for abstract representations with extended exposure.
    Johansson T
    Exp Psychol; 2009; 56(3):188-97. PubMed ID: 19289361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.