177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18927038)
1. Opposing influences on conflict-driven adaptation in the Eriksen flanker task.
Bugg JM
Mem Cognit; 2008 Oct; 36(7):1217-27. PubMed ID: 18927038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accounting for sequential trial effects in the flanker task: conflict adaptation or associative priming?
Nieuwenhuis S; Stins JF; Posthuma D; Polderman TJ; Boomsma DI; de Geus EJ
Mem Cognit; 2006 Sep; 34(6):1260-72. PubMed ID: 17225507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Individual differences in conflict-monitoring: testing means and covariance hypothesis about the Simon and the Eriksen Flanker task.
Keye D; Wilhelm O; Oberauer K; van Ravenzwaaij D
Psychol Res; 2009 Nov; 73(6):762-76. PubMed ID: 19034502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Are spatial and dimensional attention separate? evidence from Posner, Stroop, and Eriksen tasks.
Chajut E; Schupak A; Algom D
Mem Cognit; 2009 Sep; 37(6):924-34. PubMed ID: 19679870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Adjustments to recent and frequent conflict reflect two distinguishable mechanisms.
Purmann S; Badde S; Wendt M
Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Apr; 16(2):350-5. PubMed ID: 19293106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sequential dependencies in the Eriksen flanker task: a direct comparison of two competing accounts.
Davelaar EJ; Stevens J
Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Feb; 16(1):121-6. PubMed ID: 19145021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Conflict-frequency affects flanker interference: role of stimulus-ensemble-specific practiceand flanker-response contingencies.
Wendt M; Luna-Rodriguez A
Exp Psychol; 2009; 56(3):206-17. PubMed ID: 19289363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of conflict trial proportion: A comparison of the Eriksen and Simon tasks.
Bausenhart KM; Ulrich R; Miller J
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Feb; 83(2):810-836. PubMed ID: 33269440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The influence of reward in the Simon task: Differences and similarities to the Stroop and Eriksen flanker tasks.
Mittelstädt V; Ulrich R; König J; Hofbauer K; Mackenzie IG
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Apr; 85(3):949-959. PubMed ID: 36316615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Conflict Adaptation and Cue Competition during Learning in an Eriksen Flanker Task.
Ghinescu R; Schachtman TR; Ramsey AK; Gratton G; Fabiani M
PLoS One; 2016; 11(12):e0167119. PubMed ID: 27941977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Unconsciously triggered conflict adaptation.
van Gaal S; Lamme VA; Ridderinkhof KR
PLoS One; 2010 Jul; 5(7):e11508. PubMed ID: 20634898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Enhancement of perceptual representations by endogenous attention biases competition in response selection.
Klemen J; Verbruggen F; Skelton C; Chambers CD
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Nov; 73(8):2514-27. PubMed ID: 21826553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Conflict resolution in the Eriksen flanker task: Similarities and differences to the Simon task.
Hübner R; Töbel L
PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0214203. PubMed ID: 30921368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Precueing imminent conflict does not override sequence-dependent interference adaptation.
Alpay G; Goerke M; Stürmer B
Psychol Res; 2009 Nov; 73(6):803-16. PubMed ID: 19034499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Role of practice and stimulus-onset-asynchrony in modulating effects of stimulus repetition, category relation, and response compatibility in the Eriksen flanker task.
Zhang H
Percept Mot Skills; 1997 Jun; 84(3 Pt 1):1087-96. PubMed ID: 9172226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mood states influence cognitive control: the case of conflict adaptation.
Schuch S; Koch I
Psychol Res; 2015 Sep; 79(5):759-72. PubMed ID: 25100233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dynamics of attentional selection under conflict: toward a rational Bayesian account.
Yu AJ; Dayan P; Cohen JD
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Jun; 35(3):700-17. PubMed ID: 19485686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The conflict adaptation is affected by attentional strategies: evidence from the arrow flanker task.
Chen J; Li C; He C; Chen A
Sci China C Life Sci; 2009 Oct; 52(10):990-4. PubMed ID: 19911137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Features of the conflict adaptation effect in mild cognitive decline.].
Velichkovsky BB; Tatarinov DV; Khlebnikova AA; Ziberova AV; Roshchina IF; Selezneva ND; Gavrilova SI
Adv Gerontol; 2020; 33(5):996-1001. PubMed ID: 33550759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Does response interference depend on the subjective visibility of flanker distractors?
Maniscalco B; Bang JW; Iravani L; Camps-Febrer F; Lau H
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jul; 74(5):841-51. PubMed ID: 22477057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
