256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18928071)
1. Feedback on medical students' performance valued.
Sepdham D; Morrow J; Dobbie A
Fam Med; 2008; 40(7):463-4. PubMed ID: 18928071
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. "Forward feeding" about students' progress: the case for longitudinal, progressive, and shared assessment of medical students.
Cleary L
Acad Med; 2008 Sep; 83(9):800. PubMed ID: 18728429
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Pilot study of a 'RIME'-based tool for giving feedback in a multi-specialty longitudinal clerkship.
DeWitt D; Carline J; Paauw D; Pangaro L
Med Educ; 2008 Dec; 42(12):1205-9. PubMed ID: 19120951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Team-based assessment of medical students in a clinical clerkship is feasible and acceptable.
Sharma N; Cui Y; Leighton JP; White JS
Med Teach; 2012; 34(7):555-61. PubMed ID: 22746962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. "Forward feeding" about students' progress: information on struggling medical students should not be shared among clerkship directors or with students' current teachers.
Cox SM
Acad Med; 2008 Sep; 83(9):801. PubMed ID: 18728430
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Is clinical competence perceived differently for student daily performance on the wards versus clerkship grading?
Wimmers PF; Kanter SL; Splinter TA; Schmidt HG
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2008 Dec; 13(5):693-707. PubMed ID: 17690992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Written case reports as assessment of the elective student clerkship: consistency of central grading and comparison with ratings of clinical performance.
Molenaar WM; Reinders JJ; Koopmans SA; Talsma MD; van Essen LH
Med Teach; 2004 Jun; 26(4):301-4. PubMed ID: 15203841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Remediation strategies and students' clinical performance.
Faustinella F; Orlando PR; Colletti LA; Juneja HS; Perkowski LC
Med Teach; 2004 Nov; 26(7):664-5. PubMed ID: 15779125
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Web-based evaluation of medical clerkships: a new approach to immediacy and efficacy of feedback and assessment.
Duque G
Med Teach; 2003 Sep; 25(5):510-4. PubMed ID: 14522674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. "Forward feeding" about students' progress: more information will enable better policy.
Pangaro L
Acad Med; 2008 Sep; 83(9):802-3. PubMed ID: 18728431
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Factors in faculty evaluation of medical students' performance.
Pulito AR; Donnelly MB; Plymale M
Med Educ; 2007 Jul; 41(7):667-75. PubMed ID: 17614887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of an in-training assessment programme on supervision of and feedback on competencies in an undergraduate Internal Medicine clerkship.
Daelmans HE; Hoogenboom RJ; Scherpbier AJ; Stehouwer CD; van der Vleuten CP
Med Teach; 2005 Mar; 27(2):158-63. PubMed ID: 16019338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Psychiatry clerkship Objective Structured Clinical Examination is here to stay.
Vaidya NA
Acad Psychiatry; 2008; 32(3):177-9. PubMed ID: 18467471
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Demystifying "learning" in clinical rotations: do immersive patient encounters predict achievement on the clinical performance examination (CPX)?
Fung CC; Relan A; Wilkerson L
Acad Med; 2007 Oct; 82(10 Suppl):S97-S100. PubMed ID: 17895703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Do clinical evaluations in a psychiatry clerkship favor students with positive personality characteristics?
Chibnall JT; Blaskiewicz RJ
Acad Psychiatry; 2008; 32(3):199-205. PubMed ID: 18467476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. To the point: Medical education review of the RIME method for the evaluation of medical student clinical performance.
Espey E; Nuthalapaty F; Cox S; Katz N; Ogburn T; Peskin T; Goepfert A; Hammoud M; Casey P; Emmons S; Neutens JJ;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Aug; 197(2):123-33. PubMed ID: 17689622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. More questions than answers? Expanding students' reflections from a community health experience.
Paul TJ; Mitchell A; Lagrenade J; McCaw-Binns A; Falloon D; Williams-Green P
Educ Health (Abingdon); 2006 Jul; 19(2):244-50. PubMed ID: 16831806
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of students' performance in elective training in clinical disciplines.
Naqvi AS; Zafar A
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2012 Aug; 22(8):545-6. PubMed ID: 22868028
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The dependability of students' ratings of preceptors.
Mazor K; Clauser B; Cohen A; Alper E; Pugnaire M
Acad Med; 1999 Oct; 74(10 Suppl):S19-21. PubMed ID: 10536582
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. With no shelf exam available, SAEM online clerkship testing tool best option.
Emery M
Acad Emerg Med; 2010 Sep; 17(9):1028; author reply 1029. PubMed ID: 20836790
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
