231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18929104)
1. Short-wavelength automated perimetry and frequency-doubling technology perimetry in glaucoma.
Fogagnolo P; Rossetti L; Ranno S; Ferreras A; Orzalesi N
Prog Brain Res; 2008; 173():101-24. PubMed ID: 18929104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Can frequency-doubling technology and short-wavelength automated perimetries detect visual field defects before standard automated perimetry in patients with preperimetric glaucoma?
Ferreras A; Polo V; Larrosa JM; Pablo LE; Pajarin AB; Pueyo V; Honrubia FM
J Glaucoma; 2007; 16(4):372-83. PubMed ID: 17571000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Glaucomatous visual field progression with frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in a longitudinal prospective study.
Haymes SA; Hutchison DM; McCormick TA; Varma DK; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Feb; 46(2):547-54. PubMed ID: 15671281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Frequency doubling perimetry and short-wavelength automated perimetry to detect early glaucoma.
Leeprechanon N; Giaconi JA; Manassakorn A; Hoffman D; Caprioli J
Ophthalmology; 2007 May; 114(5):931-7. PubMed ID: 17397926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Diagnostic approaches for early detection of glaucoma progression].
Arend KO; Plange N
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2006 Mar; 223(3):194-216. PubMed ID: 16552653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Detectability of glaucomatous changes using SAP, FDT, flicker perimetry, and OCT.
Nomoto H; Matsumoto C; Takada S; Hashimoto S; Arimura E; Okuyama S; Shimomura Y
J Glaucoma; 2009 Feb; 18(2):165-71. PubMed ID: 19225357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Glaucoma detection with frequency doubling perimetry and short-wavelength perimetry.
Horn FK; Brenning A; Jünemann AG; Lausen B
J Glaucoma; 2007; 16(4):363-71. PubMed ID: 17570999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Standard automated perimetry and algorithms for monitoring glaucoma progression.
Scuderi GL; Cesareo M; Perdicchi A; Recupero SM
Prog Brain Res; 2008; 173():77-99. PubMed ID: 18929103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [A comparative analysis of standard automated perimetry and short wavelength automated perimetry in early diagnosis of glaucoma].
Chiseliţă D; Crenguţa MI; Danielescu C; Mihaela NM
Oftalmologia; 2006; 50(2):94-102. PubMed ID: 16927766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Standard Automated Perimetry, Short-Wavelength Automated Perimetry, and Frequency-Doubling Technology Perimetry to Monitor Glaucoma Progression.
Hu R; Wang C; Gu Y; Racette L
Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Feb; 95(7):e2618. PubMed ID: 26886602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Structure-function relationship between FDF, FDT, SAP, and scanning laser ophthalmoscopy in glaucoma patients.
Lamparter J; Russell RA; Schulze A; Schuff AC; Pfeiffer N; Hoffmann EM
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Nov; 53(12):7553-9. PubMed ID: 23074201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Groningen Longitudinal Glaucoma Study. II. A prospective comparison of frequency doubling perimetry, the GDx nerve fibre analyser and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma suspect patients.
Jansonius NM; Heeg GP
Acta Ophthalmol; 2009 Jun; 87(4):429-32. PubMed ID: 18652580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Test-retest variability for standard automated perimetry and short-wavelength automated perimetry in diabetic patients.
Bengtsson B; Hellgren KJ; Agardh E
Acta Ophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 86(2):170-6. PubMed ID: 17935606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Selective perimetry in glaucoma diagnosis.
Sakata LM; DeLeón-Ortega J; Girkin CA
Curr Opin Ophthalmol; 2007 Mar; 18(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 17301612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Normal age-related sensitivity loss for a variety of visual functions throughout the visual field.
Gardiner SK; Johnson CA; Spry PG
Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Jul; 83(7):438-43. PubMed ID: 16840869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Glaucoma progression detection with frequency doubling technology (FDT) compared to standard automated perimetry (SAP) in the Groningen Longitudinal Glaucoma Study.
Wesselink C; Jansonius NM
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Sep; 37(5):594-601. PubMed ID: 28836391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Humphrey matrix frequency doubling perimetry for detection of visual-field defects in open-angle glaucoma.
Clement CI; Goldberg I; Healey PR; Graham S
Br J Ophthalmol; 2009 May; 93(5):582-8. PubMed ID: 18669543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [FDT versus automated standard perimetry in healthy subjects].
Chiseliţa D; Ioana MC; Danielescu C; Mihaela NM
Oftalmologia; 2006; 50(3):99-104. PubMed ID: 17144515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Modern diagnostic methods for suspected glaucoma and glaucoma].
Vass C
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2004 Apr; 221(4):227-46. PubMed ID: 15118952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Long-term fluctuation of standard automatic perimetry, pulsar perimetry and frequency-doubling technology in early glaucoma diagnosis.
Gonzalez-Hernandez M; de la Rosa MG; de la Vega RR; Hernandez-Vidal A
Ophthalmic Res; 2007; 39(6):338-43. PubMed ID: 17952009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
