These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18929269)

  • 41. Treatment of Class III malocclusion with the horseshoe appliance: case reports in growing patients.
    Yang KH
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1997; 22(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 9643195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Evaluation of long-term effects in patients treated with Fränkel-2 appliance.
    Perillo L; Castaldo MI; Cannavale R; Longobardi A; Grassia V; Rullo R; Chiodini P
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2011 Dec; 12(4):261-6. PubMed ID: 22185253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Comparison of the headgear activator and Herbst appliance--effects and post-treatment changes.
    Phan KL; Bendeus M; Hägg U; Hansen K; Rabie AB
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Dec; 28(6):594-604. PubMed ID: 17142260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Dental arch and cephalometric changes following treatment for class III malocclusion by means of the function regulator (FR-3) appliance.
    Kalavritinos M; Papadopoulos MA; Nasiopoulos A
    J Orofac Orthop; 2005 Mar; 66(2):135-47. PubMed ID: 15827701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Cervical headgear vs pendulum appliance for the treatment of moderate skeletal Class II malocclusion.
    Mossaz CF; Byloff FK; Kiliaridis S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Nov; 132(5):616-23. PubMed ID: 18005835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Geometric morphometric assessment of treatment effects of maxillary protraction combined with chin cup appliance on the maxillofacial complex.
    Chang HP; Lin HC; Liu PH; Chang CH
    J Oral Rehabil; 2005 Oct; 32(10):720-8. PubMed ID: 16159349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Evaluation of Class II treatment by cephalometric regional superpositions versus conventional measurements.
    Efstratiadis S; Baumrind S; Shofer F; Jacobsson-Hunt U; Laster L; Ghafari J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Nov; 128(5):607-18. PubMed ID: 16286208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Age-related changes in sagittal relationship between the maxilla and mandible.
    Lux CJ; Burden D; Conradt C; Komposch G
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Dec; 27(6):568-78. PubMed ID: 16093257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Skeletal effects in class II treatment with the functional mandibular advancer (FMA)?
    Kinzinger G; Diedrich P
    J Orofac Orthop; 2005 Nov; 66(6):469-90. PubMed ID: 16331547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Early treatment of skeletal Class III: a case report.
    Maheshwari S; Gupta ND
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2001 Dec; 19(4):148-51. PubMed ID: 12396092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Short-term soft- and hard-tissue changes following Class III treatment using a removable mandibular retractor: a randomized controlled trial.
    Saleh M; Hajeer MY; Al-Jundi A
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2013 May; 16(2):75-86. PubMed ID: 23323964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Effect of early treatment on stability of occlusion in patients with Class II malocclusion.
    Pavlow SS; McGorray SP; Taylor MG; Dolce C; King GJ; Wheeler TT
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Feb; 133(2):235-44. PubMed ID: 18249290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Prediction of post-treatment outcome after combined treatment with maxillary protraction and chincap appliances.
    Yoshida I; Yamaguchi N; Mizoguchi I
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Feb; 28(1):89-96. PubMed ID: 16113036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Clinical outcomes of Fränkel appliance therapy assessed with a counterpart analysis.
    Cevidanes LH; Franco AA; Scanavini MA; Vigorito JW; Enlow DH; Proffit WR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Apr; 123(4):379-87. PubMed ID: 12695764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Orthodontic correction of Class III malocclusion in a young patient with the use of a simple fixed appliance.
    Park JH
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2012; 23(3):43-8. PubMed ID: 23094558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Treatment timing for an orthopedic approach to patients with increased vertical dimension.
    Baccetti T; Franchi L; Schulz SO; McNamara JA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jan; 133(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 18174072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. One-phase vs 2-phase treatment for developing Class III malocclusion: a comparison of identical twins.
    Sugawara J; Aymach Z; Hin H; Nanda R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Jan; 141(1):e11-22. PubMed ID: 22196197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Cephalometric changes in the treatment of class III using the Fränkel appliance.
    Falck F; Zimmermann-Menzel K
    J Orofac Orthop; 2008 Mar; 69(2):99-109. PubMed ID: 18385956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Craniofacial changes induced by early functional treatment of Class III malocclusion.
    Tollaro I; Baccetti T; Franchi L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1996 Mar; 109(3):310-8. PubMed ID: 8607476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Glenoid fossa position in Class III malocclusion associated with mandibular protrusion.
    Innocenti C; Giuntini V; Defraia E; Baccetti T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Apr; 135(4):438-41. PubMed ID: 19361728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.