146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18929740)
1. Comparative acceptability of the SILCS and Ortho ALL-FLEX diaphragms among couples in the Dominican Republic.
Coffey PS; Kilbourne-Brook M; Brache V; Cochón L
Contraception; 2008 Nov; 78(5):418-23. PubMed ID: 18929740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Wear and care of the SILCS diaphragm: experience from three countries.
Coffey PS; Kilbourne-Brook M
Sex Health; 2010 Jun; 7(2):159-64. PubMed ID: 20465980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Short-term acceptability of a single-size diaphragm among couples in South Africa and Thailand.
Coffey PS; Kilbourne-Brook M; Beksinska M; Thongkrajai E
J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care; 2008 Oct; 34(4):233-6. PubMed ID: 18854068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. SILCS diaphragm: postcoital testing of a new single-size contraceptive device.
Schwartz JL; Ballagh SA; Creinin MD; Rountree RW; Kilbourne-Brook M; Mauck CK; Callahan MM
Contraception; 2008 Sep; 78(3):237-44. PubMed ID: 18692615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Couples' acceptability of the SILCS diaphragm for microbicide delivery.
Frezieres RG; Walsh T; Kilbourne-Brook M; Coffey PS
Contraception; 2012 Jan; 85(1):99-107. PubMed ID: 22067809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Magnetic resonance imaging of SILCS diaphragm: anatomical considerations and corroboration with clinical fit.
Yang CC; Maravilla KR; Kilbourne-Brook M; Austin G
Contraception; 2007 Sep; 76(3):238-44. PubMed ID: 17707723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Lea's Shield contraceptive device: pilot study of its short-term patient acceptability and aspects of use.
Bounds W; Guillebaud J
Br J Fam Plann; 1999 Jan; 24(4):117-20. PubMed ID: 10023094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evidence-based planning of a randomized controlled trial on diaphragm use for prevention of sexually transmitted infections.
Behets FM; Van Damme K; Turner AN; Rabenja NL; Ravelomanana NL; Raharinivo MS; Zeller KA; Rennie SM; Swezey TA
Sex Transm Dis; 2008 Mar; 35(3):238-42. PubMed ID: 18166850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diaphragms in clinical trials: is clinician fitting necessary?
Mauck C; Lai JJ; Schwartz J; Weiner DH
Contraception; 2004 Apr; 69(4):263-6. PubMed ID: 15033398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Acceptability of an existing, female-controlled contraceptive method that could potentially protect against HIV: a comparison of diaphragm users and other method users.
Bird ST; Harvey SM; Maher JE; Beckman LJ
Womens Health Issues; 2004; 14(3):85-93. PubMed ID: 15193636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Phase I study of the functional performance, safety and acceptability of the BufferGel Duet.
Ballagh SA; Brache V; Mauck C; Callahan MM; Cochon L; Wheeless A; Moench TR
Contraception; 2008 Feb; 77(2):130-7. PubMed ID: 18226678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Use of the diaphragm without spermicides may be just as effective in preventing unwanted pregnancy.
Newsl Womens Glob Netw Reprod Rights; 1994; (45):13-4. PubMed ID: 12318715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Randomized Crossover Study Evaluating the Use and Acceptability of the SILCS Diaphragm Compared to Vaginal Applicators for Vaginal Gel Delivery.
Beksinska M; Greener R; Smit J; Maphumulo B; Mphili N; Kilbourne-Brook M; Coffey PS
AIDS Behav; 2018 Jan; 22(1):127-132. PubMed ID: 28993940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Acceptability of the vaginal diaphragm among current users.
Maher JE; Harvey SM; Bird ST; Stevens VJ; Beckman LJ
Perspect Sex Reprod Health; 2004; 36(2):64-71. PubMed ID: 15136209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Consistent use of a combination product versus a single product in a safety trial of the diaphragm and microbicide in Harare, Zimbabwe.
van der Straten A; Moore J; Napierala S; Clouse K; Mauck C; Hammond N; Padian N
Contraception; 2008 Jun; 77(6):435-43. PubMed ID: 18477494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Delivery of microbicides to the vagina: difficulties reported with the use of three devices, adherence to use and preferences.
Hardy E; Hebling EM; Sousa MH; Almeida AF; Amaral E
Contraception; 2007 Aug; 76(2):126-31. PubMed ID: 17656182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A multinational evaluation of the efficacy, safety and acceptability of the Protectaid contraceptive sponge.
Creatsas G; Guerrero E; Guilbert E; Drouin J; Serfaty D; Lemieux L; Suissa S; Colin P
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2001 Sep; 6(3):172-82. PubMed ID: 11763982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Acceptability and use of the female condom and diaphragm among sex workers in Dominican Republic: results from a prospective study.
Lara DK; Grossman DA; Muñoz JE; Rosario SR; Gómez BJ; García SG
AIDS Educ Prev; 2009 Dec; 21(6):538-51. PubMed ID: 20030498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Women find arcing-spring diaphragm easier to insert, studies indicate.
Contracept Technol Update; 1986 Apr; 7(4):41-2. PubMed ID: 12340681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diaphragm acceptability among young women at risk for HIV.
Thorburn S; Harvey SM; Tipton J
Women Health; 2006; 44(1):21-39. PubMed ID: 17182525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
