BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

272 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18929814)

  • 1. Heart transplantation under cyclosporine or tacrolimus combined with mycophenolate mofetil or everolimus.
    Wang SS; Chou NK; Chi NH; Wu IH; Chen YS; Yu HY; Huang SC; Wang CH; Ko WJ; Tsao CI; Sun CD
    Transplant Proc; 2008 Oct; 40(8):2607-8. PubMed ID: 18929814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Tacrolimus plus mycophenolate mofetil vs. cyclosporine plus everolimus in deceased donor kidney transplant recipients: three-yr results of a single-center prospective clinical trial.
    Favi E; Spagnoletti G; Salerno MP; Pedroso JA; Romagnoli J; Citterio F
    Clin Transplant; 2013; 27(4):E359-67. PubMed ID: 23710603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The survival of heart transplant recipients using cyclosporine and everolimus is not inferior to that using cyclosporine and mycophenolate.
    Wang SS; Chou NK; Chi NH; Huang SC; Wu IH; Wang CH; Yu HY; Chen YS; Tsao CI; Ko WJ; Shun CT
    Transplant Proc; 2010 Apr; 42(3):938-9. PubMed ID: 20430209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A randomized long-term trial of tacrolimus and sirolimus versus tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclosporine (NEORAL) and sirolimus in renal transplantation. I. Drug interactions and rejection at one year.
    Ciancio G; Burke GW; Gaynor JJ; Mattiazzi A; Roth D; Kupin W; Nicolas M; Ruiz P; Rosen A; Miller J
    Transplantation; 2004 Jan; 77(2):244-51. PubMed ID: 14742989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cyclosporine lowering with everolimus versus mycophenolate mofetil in heart transplant recipients: long-term follow-up of the SHIRAKISS randomized, prospective study.
    Potena L; Prestinenzi P; Bianchi IG; Masetti M; Romani P; Magnani G; Fallani F; Coccolo F; Russo A; Ponticelli C; Rapezzi C; Grigioni F; Branzi A
    J Heart Lung Transplant; 2012 Jun; 31(6):565-70. PubMed ID: 22341702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cardiovascular risk profile in kidney transplant recipients treated with two immunosuppressive regimens: tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil versus everolimus and low-dose cyclosporine.
    Spagnoletti G; Citterio F; Favi E; Rossi E; Delreno F; De Santis I; Salerno MP; Gargiulo A; Castagneto M
    Transplant Proc; 2009 May; 41(4):1175-7. PubMed ID: 19460509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Lower incidence of cytomegalovirus infection with everolimus versus mycophenolate mofetil in de novo cardiac transplant recipients: a randomized, multicenter study.
    Viganò M; Dengler T; Mattei MF; Poncelet A; Vanhaecke J; Vermes E; Kleinloog R; Li Y; Gezahegen Y; Delgado JF;
    Transpl Infect Dis; 2010 Feb; 12(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 19744284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prospective clinical trial comparing two immunosuppressive regimens, tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil versus everolimus and low-dose cyclosporine, in de novo renal transplant recipients: results at 6 months follow-up.
    Favi E; Citterio F; Spagnoletti G; Gargiulo A; Delreno F; Romagnoli J; Castagneto M
    Transplant Proc; 2009 May; 41(4):1152-5. PubMed ID: 19460503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. De novo immunosuppression with sirolimus and tacrolimus in heart transplant recipients compared with cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil: a one-year follow-up analysis.
    Zucker MJ; Baran DA; Arroyo LH; Goldstein DJ; Neacy C; Mele L; Weinberg AD; Prendergast TW; Ribner HS
    Transplant Proc; 2005 Jun; 37(5):2231-9. PubMed ID: 15964386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ten-year results of a randomized trial comparing tacrolimus versus cyclosporine a in combination with mycophenolate mofetil after heart transplantation.
    Guethoff S; Meiser BM; Groetzner J; Eifert S; Grinninger C; Ueberfuhr P; Reichart B; Hagl C; Kaczmarek I
    Transplantation; 2013 Feb; 95(4):629-34. PubMed ID: 23423270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cardiac allograft vasculopathy compared by intravascular ultrasound sonography: everolimus to mycophenolate mofetil--one single-center experience.
    Chou NK; Jan CF; Chi NH; Lee CM; Wu IH; Huang SC; Chen YS; Yu HY; Tsao CI; Ko WJ; Chu SH; Wang SS
    Transplant Proc; 2012 May; 44(4):897-9. PubMed ID: 22564578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical experience of tacrolimus with everolimus in heart transplantation.
    Wang SS; Chou NK; Chi NH; Huang SC; Wu IH; Wang CH; Yu HY; Chen YS; Tsao CI; Ko WJ; Shun CT
    Transplant Proc; 2012 May; 44(4):907-9. PubMed ID: 22564581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Economic evaluation of everolimus and mycophenolate mofetil versus azathioprine in de novo heart transplantation.
    Annemans L; Lemkuhl H; Tenderich G; Schulz U; Yang XL; Ricci JF; Hetzer R
    Transplant Proc; 2007 Dec; 39(10):3306-12. PubMed ID: 18089377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Long-term results of mycophenolate mofetil as part of immunosuppressive induction therapy after liver transplantation.
    Langrehr JM; Klupp J; Glanemann M; Junge G; Pfitzmann R; Bahra M; Radtke C; Neumann U; Neuhaus R; Neuhaus P
    Clin Transplant; 2006; 20(3):272-83. PubMed ID: 16824141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Randomized trial of tacrolimus in combination with sirolimus or mycophenolate mofetil in kidney transplantation: results at 6 months.
    Gonwa T; Mendez R; Yang HC; Weinstein S; Jensik S; Steinberg S;
    Transplantation; 2003 Apr; 75(8):1213-20. PubMed ID: 12717205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Differential pharmacokinetic interaction of tacrolimus and cyclosporine on everolimus.
    Kovarik JM; Curtis JJ; Hricik DE; Pescovitz MD; Scantlebury V; Vasquez A
    Transplant Proc; 2006 Dec; 38(10):3456-8. PubMed ID: 17175302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical outcome in heart transplant recipients receiving everolimus in combination with dosage reduction of the calcineurin inhibitor cyclosporine A or tacrolimus.
    Fuchs U; Zittermann A; Ensminger SM; Schulz U; Gummert JF
    Transpl Immunol; 2014 Aug; 31(2):87-91. PubMed ID: 24932812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Combination of everolimus and tacrolimus in kidney transplant patients with intolerance to mycophenolate mofetil/mycophenolic acid.
    Balda S; Inza A; Odriozola N; Zárraga S; García-Erauskin G; Lampreabe I
    Transplant Proc; 2009; 41(6):2095-8. PubMed ID: 19715841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A 1-year randomized controlled study of everolimus versus mycophenolate mofetil with reduced-dose cyclosporine in maintenance heart transplant recipients.
    Bara C; Dengler T; Hack MA; Ladenburger S; Lehmkuhl HB
    Transplant Proc; 2013; 45(6):2387-92. PubMed ID: 23953553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Randomized trial of tacrolimus + mycophenolate mofetil or azathioprine versus cyclosporine + mycophenolate mofetil after cadaveric kidney transplantation: results at three years.
    Gonwa T; Johnson C; Ahsan N; Alfrey EJ; Halloran P; Stegall M; Hardy M; Metzger R; Shield C; Rocher L; Scandling J; Sorensen J; Mulloy L; Light J; Corwin C; Danovitch G; Wachs M; VanVeldhuisen P; Leonhardt M; Fitzsimmons WE
    Transplantation; 2003 Jun; 75(12):2048-53. PubMed ID: 12829910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.