669 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18930102)
1. Evaluation of potential human carcinogenicity of the synthetic monomer ethyl acrylate.
Williams GM; Iatropoulos MJ
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2009 Feb; 53(1):6-15. PubMed ID: 18930102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. NTP Carcinogenesis Studies of Ethyl Acrylate (CAS No. 140-88-5) in F344/N Rats and B6C3F1 Mice (Gavage Studies).
National Toxicology Program
Natl Toxicol Program Tech Rep Ser; 1986 Dec; 259():1-224. PubMed ID: 12748689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. NTP toxicology and carcinogenesis studies of 3,3',4,4',5-pentachlorobiphenyl (PCB 126) (CAS No. 57465-28-8) in female Harlan Sprague-Dawley rats (Gavage Studies).
National Toxicology Program
Natl Toxicol Program Tech Rep Ser; 2006 Jan; (520):4-246. PubMed ID: 16628245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. NTP Technical Report on the comparative toxicity studies of allyl acetate (CAS No. 591-87-7), allyl alcohol (CAS No. 107-18-6) and acrolein (CAS No. 107-02-8) administered by gavage to F344/N rats and B6C3F1 mice.
Irwin RD
Toxic Rep Ser; 2006 Jul; (48):1-73, A1-H10. PubMed ID: 17160105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Demonstration of a temporal relationship between ethyl acrylate-induced forestomach cell proliferation and carcinogenicity.
Ghanayem BI; Sanchez IM; Matthews HB; Elwell MR
Toxicol Pathol; 1994; 22(5):497-509. PubMed ID: 7899778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Relationship between the time of sustained ethyl acrylate forestomach hyperplasia and carcinogenicity.
Ghanayem BI; Sanchez IM; Maronpot RR; Elwell MR; Matthews HB
Environ Health Perspect; 1993 Dec; 101 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):277-9. PubMed ID: 8013421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [DNA damage test in forestomach squamous epithelium of F344 rat following oral administration of ethyl acrylate].
Morimoto K; Tsuji K; Osawa R; Takahashi A
Eisei Shikenjo Hokoku; 1990; (108):125-8. PubMed ID: 1364340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantitation of an epithelial S-phase response in the rat forestomach and glandular stomach following gavage dosing with ethyl acrylate.
Gillette DM; Frederick CB
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 1993 Oct; 122(2):244-57. PubMed ID: 8212006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The histopathological and biochemical response of the stomach of male F344/N rats following two weeks of oral dosing with ethyl acrylate.
Frederick CB; Hazelton GA; Frantz JD
Toxicol Pathol; 1990; 18(2):247-56. PubMed ID: 2399412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Forestomach tumor induction by 2,4-hexadienal in F344N rats and B6C3F1 mice.
Chan PC; Mahler J; Peddada S; Lomnitski L; Nyska A
Arch Toxicol; 2003 Sep; 77(9):511-20. PubMed ID: 12879212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A review of the genotoxic, mutagenic, and carcinogenic potentials of several lower acrylates.
Suh M; Proctor D; Chappell G; Rager J; Thompson C; Borghoff S; Finch L; Ellis-Hutchings R; Wiench K
Toxicology; 2018 Jun; 402-403():50-67. PubMed ID: 29689363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sustainability of forestomach hyperplasia in rats treated with ethyl acrylate for 13 weeks and regression after cessation of dosing.
Ghanayem BI; Matthews HB; Maronpot RR
Toxicol Pathol; 1991; 19(3):273-9. PubMed ID: 1723532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of the mode of action underlying development of forestomach tumors in rodents following oral exposure to ethyl acrylate and relevance to humans.
Thompson CM; Suh M; Proctor DM; Chappell G; Borghoff S; Ellis-Hutchings R; Wiench K; Finch L
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2018 Jul; 96():178-189. PubMed ID: 29738809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mode-of-action framework for evaluating the relevance of rodent forestomach tumors in cancer risk assessment.
Proctor DM; Gatto NM; Hong SJ; Allamneni KP
Toxicol Sci; 2007 Aug; 98(2):313-26. PubMed ID: 17426108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Topical application of representative multifunctional acrylates produced proliferative and inflammatory lesions in F344/N rats and B6C3F1 mice, and squamous cell neoplasms in Tg.AC mice.
Doi AM; Hailey JR; Hejtmancik M; Toft JD; Vallant M; Chhabra RS
Toxicol Pathol; 2005; 33(6):631-40. PubMed ID: 16176922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Are tumor incidence rates from chronic bioassays telling us what we need to know about carcinogens?
Gaylor DW
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2005 Mar; 41(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 15698536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Amended final report on the safety assessment of polyacrylamide and acrylamide residues in cosmetics.
Int J Toxicol; 2005; 24 Suppl 2():21-50. PubMed ID: 16154914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Review of studies concerning the tumorigenicity of 2-butoxyethanol in B6C3F1 mice and its relevance for human risk assessment.
Boatman R; Corley R; Green T; Klaunig J; Udden M
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2004; 7(5):385-98. PubMed ID: 15371241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Critical evaluation of the cancer risk of dibromochloropropane (DBCP).
Clark HA; Snedeker SM
J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev; 2005; 23(2):215-60. PubMed ID: 16291528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Final report of the safety assessment of Alcohol Denat., including SD Alcohol 3-A, SD Alcohol 30, SD Alcohol 39, SD Alcohol 39-B, SD Alcohol 39-C, SD Alcohol 40, SD Alcohol 40-B, and SD Alcohol 40-C, and the denaturants, Quassin, Brucine Sulfate/Brucine, and Denatonium Benzoate.
Cosmetic Ingredient Review Expert Panel
Int J Toxicol; 2008; 27 Suppl 1():1-43. PubMed ID: 18569160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
