BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

575 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18930285)

  • 1. Evaluating outcomes of enterocystoplasty in patients with spina bifida: a review of the literature.
    Scales CD; Wiener JS
    J Urol; 2008 Dec; 180(6):2323-9. PubMed ID: 18930285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Update on Urological Management of Spina Bifida from Prenatal Diagnosis to Adulthood.
    Snow-Lisy DC; Yerkes EB; Cheng EY
    J Urol; 2015 Aug; 194(2):288-96. PubMed ID: 25839383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Enterocystoplasty vs detrusorectomy: outcome in the adult with spina bifida.
    Veenboer PW; Nadorp S; de Jong TP; Dik P; van Asbeck FW; Bosch JL; de Kort LM
    J Urol; 2013 Mar; 189(3):1066-70. PubMed ID: 23017520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Augmentation cystoplasty rates at children's hospitals in the United States: a pediatric health information system database study.
    Lendvay TS; Cowan CA; Mitchell MM; Joyner BD; Grady RW
    J Urol; 2006 Oct; 176(4 Pt 2):1716-20. PubMed ID: 16945630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Continuous local anesthetic infusion for children with spina bifida undergoing major reconstruction of the lower urinary tract.
    Chalmers DJ; Bielsky A; Wild TT; Siparsky GL; Wilcox DT
    J Pediatr Urol; 2015 Apr; 11(2):72.e1-5. PubMed ID: 25819374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An artificial somatic-autonomic reflex pathway procedure for bladder control in children with spina bifida.
    Xiao CG; Du MX; Li B; Liu Z; Chen M; Chen ZH; Cheng P; Xue XN; Shapiro E; Lepor H
    J Urol; 2005 Jun; 173(6):2112-6. PubMed ID: 15879861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bladder augmentation versus urinary diversion in patients with spina bifida in the United States.
    Wiener JS; Antonelli J; Shea AM; Curtis LH; Schulman KA; Krupski TL; Scales CD
    J Urol; 2011 Jul; 186(1):161-5. PubMed ID: 21575969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bacteriuria management and urological evaluation of patients with spina bifida and neurogenic bladder: a multicenter survey.
    Elliott SP; Villar R; Duncan B
    J Urol; 2005 Jan; 173(1):217-20. PubMed ID: 15592079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Autologous cell seeded biodegradable scaffold for augmentation cystoplasty: phase II study in children and adolescents with spina bifida.
    Joseph DB; Borer JG; De Filippo RE; Hodges SJ; McLorie GA
    J Urol; 2014 May; 191(5):1389-95. PubMed ID: 24184366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Long-term functional outcomes of augmentation cystoplasty in adult spina bifida patients: A single-center experience in a multidisciplinary team.
    Perrouin-Verbe MA; Léon P; Denys P; Mongiat-Artus P; Chartier-Kastler E; Phé V
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2019 Jan; 38(1):330-337. PubMed ID: 30350892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Risk of Reaugmentation after Enterocystoplasty Using a Reconfigured Bowel Segment in Patients with Spina Bifida: A Bi-Institutional Cohort Study.
    VanderBrink BA; Szymanski KM; Alam Z; Misseri R; DeFoor WR; Kaefer M; Reddy P; Rink RC; Minevich E; Cain MP
    J Urol; 2019 Sep; 202(3):612-616. PubMed ID: 31042110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intractable high-pressure bladder in female infants with spina bifida: clinical characteristics and use of vesicostomy.
    Lee MW; Greenfield SP
    Urology; 2005 Mar; 65(3):568-71. PubMed ID: 15780378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Urological follow-up of adult spina bifida patients.
    Ahmad I; Granitsiotis P
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2007; 26(7):978-80. PubMed ID: 17626275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Management goals for the spina bifida neurogenic bladder: a review from infancy to adulthood.
    Mourtzinos A; Stoffel JT
    Urol Clin North Am; 2010 Nov; 37(4):527-35. PubMed ID: 20955904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A multicenter evaluation of urinary incontinence management and outcome in spina bifida.
    Lemelle JL; Guillemin F; Aubert D; Guys JM; Lottmann H; Lortat-Jacob S; Moscovici J; Mouriquand P; Ruffion A; Schmitt M
    J Urol; 2006 Jan; 175(1):208-12. PubMed ID: 16406913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Complications of complex lower urinary tract reconstruction in patients with neurogenic versus nonneurogenic bladder--is there a difference?
    Novak TE; Salmasi AH; Mathews RI; Lakshmanan Y; Gearhart JP
    J Urol; 2008 Dec; 180(6):2629-34; discussion 2634-5. PubMed ID: 18951557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nationwide Trends and Variations in Urological Surgical Interventions and Renal Outcome in Patients with Spina Bifida.
    Wang HH; Lloyd JC; Wiener JS; Routh JC
    J Urol; 2016 Apr; 195(4 Pt 2):1189-94. PubMed ID: 26926542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Population based assessment of enterocystoplasty complications in adults.
    Welk B; Herschorn S; Law C; Nam R
    J Urol; 2012 Aug; 188(2):464-9. PubMed ID: 22704106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Health related quality of life in patients with spina bifida: a prospective assessment before and after lower urinary tract reconstruction.
    MacNeily AE; Jafari S; Scott H; Dalgetty A; Afshar K
    J Urol; 2009 Oct; 182(4 Suppl):1984-91. PubMed ID: 19695599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Patients with spina bifida and bladder cancer: atypical presentation, advanced stage and poor survival.
    Austin JC; Elliott S; Cooper CS
    J Urol; 2007 Sep; 178(3 Pt 1):798-801. PubMed ID: 17631349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 29.