BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

304 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18930457)

  • 1. Tubal sterilization by laparoscopy or hysteroscopy: which is the most cost-effective procedure?
    Franchini M; Cianferoni L; Lippi G; Calonaci F; Calzolari S; Mazzini M; Florio P
    Fertil Steril; 2009 Apr; 91(4 Suppl):1499-502. PubMed ID: 18930457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Office hysteroscopic sterilization compared with laparoscopic sterilization: a critical cost analysis.
    Levie MD; Chudnoff SG
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2005; 12(4):318-22. PubMed ID: 16036190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An economic comparison of female sterilization of hysteroscopic tubal occlusion with laparoscopic bilateral tubal ligation.
    Kraemer DF; Yen PY; Nichols M
    Contraception; 2009 Sep; 80(3):254-60. PubMed ID: 19698817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Retrospective cost analysis comparing Essure hysteroscopic sterilization and laparoscopic bilateral tubal coagulation.
    Hopkins MR; Creedon DJ; Wagie AE; Williams AR; Famuyide AO
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(1):97-102. PubMed ID: 17218238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Cost effects of laparoscopic and hysteroscopic female sterilization].
    Rajecki M; Blomqvist S; Väisänen S; Jokinen E; Kyöstilä SL; Nord-Saari M; Rissanen P; Hurskainen R
    Duodecim; 2014; 130(8):823-31. PubMed ID: 24822333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cost-effectiveness analysis comparing the essure tubal sterilization procedure and laparoscopic tubal sterilization.
    Thiel JA; Carson GD
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2008 Jul; 30(7):581-585. PubMed ID: 18644179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hysteroscopic tubal sterilization: a health economic literature review.
    Toronto Health Economic and Technology Assessment (THETA) Collaborative
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2013; 13(22):1-25. PubMed ID: 24228085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of Healthcare Costs Among Commercially Insured Women in the United States Who Underwent Hysteroscopic Sterilization Versus Laparoscopic Bilateral Tubal Ligation Sterilization.
    Carney PI; Yao J; Lin J; Law A
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2017 May; 26(5):483-490. PubMed ID: 28157426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hysteroscopic tubal sterilization (essure) in women with an intrauterine device.
    Agostini A; Crochet P; Petrakian M; Estrade JP; Cravello L; Gamerre M
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(3):277-9. PubMed ID: 18439497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hysteroscopic tubal occlusion: sterilization after failed laparoscopic or abdominal approaches.
    Podolsky ML; Desai NA; Waters TP; Nyirjesy P
    Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Feb; 111(2 Pt 2):513-5. PubMed ID: 18239004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Evaluation of direct hospital and extra-hospital cost of operative hysteroscopy and vaginal hysterectomy].
    Cravello L; Isnardi M; Violin G; Duthilleul A; Sambuc R; Blanc B
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1999 Jul; 28(4):335-42. PubMed ID: 10480064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Laparoscopic management of hysteroscopic essure sterilization complications: report of 3 cases.
    Hur HC; Mansuria SM; Chen BA; Lee TT
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(3):362-5. PubMed ID: 18439513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Techniques for removal of the Essure hysteroscopic tubal occlusion device.
    Lannon BM; Lee SY
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Aug; 88(2):497.e13-4. PubMed ID: 17397840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Tubal sterilization: pregnancy rates after hysteroscopic versus laparoscopic sterilization in France, 2006-2010.
    Fernandez H; Legendre G; Blein C; Lamarsalle L; Panel P
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Sep; 180():133-7. PubMed ID: 24993770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Economic and clinical outcomes of microlaparoscopic and standard laparoscopic sterilization. A comparison.
    Garcia FA; Steinmetz I; Barker B; Huggins GR
    J Reprod Med; 2000 May; 45(5):372-6. PubMed ID: 10845168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Transcervical sterilization.
    Castaño PM; Adekunle L
    Semin Reprod Med; 2010 Mar; 28(2):103-9. PubMed ID: 20352559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Trends in sterilization since the introduction of Essure hysteroscopic sterilization.
    Shavell VI; Abdallah ME; Shade GH; Diamond MP; Berman JM
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2009; 16(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 18996773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hysteroscopic tubal sterilization.
    Magos A; Chapman L
    Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2004 Sep; 31(3):705-19, xii. PubMed ID: 15450329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tubal sterilizations performed in freestanding, ambulatory-care surgical facilities in the United States in 1980.
    Greenspan JR; Phillips JM; Rubin GL; Rhodenhiser EP; Ory HW
    J Reprod Med; 1984 Apr; 29(4):237-41. PubMed ID: 6232381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hysteroscopic sterilization.
    Sciarra JJ; Keith L
    Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 1995 Sep; 22(3):581-9. PubMed ID: 8524539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.