BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18931458)

  • 1. False-positive results obtained from the branch-site test of positive selection.
    Suzuki Y
    Genes Genet Syst; 2008 Aug; 83(4):331-8. PubMed ID: 18931458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reliabilities of identifying positive selection by the branch-site and the site-prediction methods.
    Nozawa M; Suzuki Y; Nei M
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2009 Apr; 106(16):6700-5. PubMed ID: 19339501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A method for detecting positive selection at single amino acid sites.
    Suzuki Y; Gojobori T
    Mol Biol Evol; 1999 Oct; 16(10):1315-28. PubMed ID: 10563013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Statistical properties of the branch-site test of positive selection.
    Yang Z; dos Reis M
    Mol Biol Evol; 2011 Mar; 28(3):1217-28. PubMed ID: 21087944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of an improved branch-site likelihood method for detecting positive selection at the molecular level.
    Zhang J; Nielsen R; Yang Z
    Mol Biol Evol; 2005 Dec; 22(12):2472-9. PubMed ID: 16107592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The branch-site test of positive selection is surprisingly robust but lacks power under synonymous substitution saturation and variation in GC.
    Gharib WH; Robinson-Rechavi M
    Mol Biol Evol; 2013 Jul; 30(7):1675-86. PubMed ID: 23558341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improved inference of site-specific positive selection under a generalized parametric codon model when there are multinucleotide mutations and multiple nonsynonymous rates.
    Dunn KA; Kenney T; Gu H; Bielawski JP
    BMC Evol Biol; 2019 Jan; 19(1):22. PubMed ID: 30642241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Inferring natural selection operating on conservative and radical substitution at single amino acid sites.
    Suzuki Y
    Genes Genet Syst; 2007 Aug; 82(4):341-60. PubMed ID: 17895585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multiple hypothesis testing to detect lineages under positive selection that affects only a few sites.
    Anisimova M; Yang Z
    Mol Biol Evol; 2007 May; 24(5):1219-28. PubMed ID: 17339634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Methods for incorporating the hypermutability of CpG dinucleotides in detecting natural selection operating at the amino acid sequence level.
    Suzuki Y; Gojobori T; Kumar S
    Mol Biol Evol; 2009 Oct; 26(10):2275-84. PubMed ID: 19581348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Frequent false detection of positive selection by the likelihood method with branch-site models.
    Zhang J
    Mol Biol Evol; 2004 Jul; 21(7):1332-9. PubMed ID: 15014150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Codon-based tests of positive selection, branch lengths, and the evolution of mammalian immune system genes.
    Hughes AL; Friedman R
    Immunogenetics; 2008 Sep; 60(9):495-506. PubMed ID: 18581108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. False-positive selection identified by ML-based methods: examples from the Sig1 gene of the diatom Thalassiosira weissflogii and the tax gene of a human T-cell lymphotropic virus.
    Suzuki Y; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 2004 May; 21(5):914-21. PubMed ID: 15014169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Detecting positively selected sites from amino Acid sequences: an implicit codon model.
    Ouyang Z; Liang J
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2007; 2007():5302-6. PubMed ID: 18003204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A random effects branch-site model for detecting episodic diversifying selection.
    Kosakovsky Pond SL; Murrell B; Fourment M; Frost SD; Delport W; Scheffler K
    Mol Biol Evol; 2011 Nov; 28(11):3033-43. PubMed ID: 21670087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. New methods for detecting positive selection at single amino acid sites.
    Suzuki Y
    J Mol Evol; 2004 Jul; 59(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 15383903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sexual selection and the molecular evolution of ADAM proteins.
    Finn S; Civetta A
    J Mol Evol; 2010 Sep; 71(3):231-40. PubMed ID: 20730583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Likelihood-based clustering (LiBaC) for codon models, a method for grouping sites according to similarities in the underlying process of evolution.
    Bao L; Gu H; Dunn KA; Bielawski JP
    Mol Biol Evol; 2008 Sep; 25(9):1995-2007. PubMed ID: 18586695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multinucleotide mutations cause false inferences of lineage-specific positive selection.
    Venkat A; Hahn MW; Thornton JW
    Nat Ecol Evol; 2018 Aug; 2(8):1280-1288. PubMed ID: 29967485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Heterogeneous selection on LEGCYC paralogs in relation to flower morphology and the phylogeny of Lupinus (Leguminosae).
    Ree RH; Citerne HL; Lavin M; Cronk QC
    Mol Biol Evol; 2004 Feb; 21(2):321-31. PubMed ID: 14660696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.