BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18931458)

  • 21. The effect of insertions, deletions, and alignment errors on the branch-site test of positive selection.
    Fletcher W; Yang Z
    Mol Biol Evol; 2010 Oct; 27(10):2257-67. PubMed ID: 20447933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Codon-substitution models for detecting molecular adaptation at individual sites along specific lineages.
    Yang Z; Nielsen R
    Mol Biol Evol; 2002 Jun; 19(6):908-17. PubMed ID: 12032247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The site-wise log-likelihood score is a good predictor of genes under positive selection.
    Wang HC; Susko E; Roger AJ
    J Mol Evol; 2013 May; 76(5):280-94. PubMed ID: 23595859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Large-Scale Comparative Analysis of Codon Models Accounting for Protein and Nucleotide Selection.
    Davydov II; Salamin N; Robinson-Rechavi M
    Mol Biol Evol; 2019 Jun; 36(6):1316-1332. PubMed ID: 30847475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A Phenotype-Genotype Codon Model for Detecting Adaptive Evolution.
    Jones CT; Youssef N; Susko E; Bielawski JP
    Syst Biol; 2020 Jul; 69(4):722-738. PubMed ID: 31730199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Genome-wide signals of positive selection in strongylocentrotid sea urchins.
    Kober KM; Pogson GH
    BMC Genomics; 2017 Jul; 18(1):555. PubMed ID: 28732465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Detecting Adaptation in Protein-Coding Genes Using a Bayesian Site-Heterogeneous Mutation-Selection Codon Substitution Model.
    Rodrigue N; Lartillot N
    Mol Biol Evol; 2017 Jan; 34(1):204-214. PubMed ID: 27744408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Proceedings of the SMBE Tri-National Young Investigators' Workshop 2005. Control of the false discovery rate applied to the detection of positively selected amino acid sites.
    Guindon S; Black M; Rodrigo A;
    Mol Biol Evol; 2006 May; 23(5):919-26. PubMed ID: 16423864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Less is more: an adaptive branch-site random effects model for efficient detection of episodic diversifying selection.
    Smith MD; Wertheim JO; Weaver S; Murrell B; Scheffler K; Kosakovsky Pond SL
    Mol Biol Evol; 2015 May; 32(5):1342-53. PubMed ID: 25697341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Bayes empirical bayes inference of amino acid sites under positive selection.
    Yang Z; Wong WS; Nielsen R
    Mol Biol Evol; 2005 Apr; 22(4):1107-18. PubMed ID: 15689528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Overestimation of nonsynonymous/synonymous rate ratio by reverse-translation of aligned amino acid sequences.
    Suzuki Y
    Genes Genet Syst; 2011; 86(2):123-9. PubMed ID: 21670552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Codon-substitution models to detect adaptive evolution that account for heterogeneous selective pressures among site classes.
    Yang Z; Swanson WJ
    Mol Biol Evol; 2002 Jan; 19(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 11752189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Performance of standard and stochastic branch-site models for detecting positive selection among coding sequences.
    Lu A; Guindon S
    Mol Biol Evol; 2014 Feb; 31(2):484-95. PubMed ID: 24132121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Bursts of nonsynonymous substitutions in HIV-1 evolution reveal instances of positive selection at conservative protein sites.
    Bazykin GA; Dushoff J; Levin SA; Kondrashov AS
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2006 Dec; 103(51):19396-401. PubMed ID: 17164328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Differences in molecular evolutionary rates among microRNAs in the human and chimpanzee genomes.
    Santpere G; Lopez-Valenzuela M; Petit-Marty N; Navarro A; Espinosa-Parrilla Y
    BMC Genomics; 2016 Jul; 17():528. PubMed ID: 27474039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Gene Tree Affects Inference of Sites Under Selection by the Branch-Site Test of Positive Selection.
    Diekmann Y; Pereira-Leal JB
    Evol Bioinform Online; 2015; 11(Suppl 2):11-7. PubMed ID: 26819542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Selective pressures on the olfactory receptor repertoire since the human-chimpanzee divergence.
    Gimelbrant AA; Skaletsky H; Chess A
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2004 Jun; 101(24):9019-22. PubMed ID: 15178761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evolutionary Shortcuts via Multinucleotide Substitutions and Their Impact on Natural Selection Analyses.
    Lucaci AG; Zehr JD; Enard D; Thornton JW; Kosakovsky Pond SL
    Mol Biol Evol; 2023 Jul; 40(7):. PubMed ID: 37395787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evidence for positive selection on a sexual reproduction gene in the diatom genus Thalassiosira (Bacillariophyta).
    Sorhannus U; Kosakovsky Pond SL
    J Mol Evol; 2006 Aug; 63(2):231-9. PubMed ID: 16830090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Accuracy and power of statistical methods for detecting adaptive evolution in protein coding sequences and for identifying positively selected sites.
    Wong WS; Yang Z; Goldman N; Nielsen R
    Genetics; 2004 Oct; 168(2):1041-51. PubMed ID: 15514074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.