These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18931509)

  • 1. Optimal DNA pooling-based two-stage designs in case-control association studies.
    Zhao Y; Wang S
    Hum Hered; 2009; 67(1):46-56. PubMed ID: 18931509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Optimal designs for two-stage genome-wide association studies.
    Skol AD; Scott LJ; Abecasis GR; Boehnke M
    Genet Epidemiol; 2007 Nov; 31(7):776-88. PubMed ID: 17549752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimal robust two-stage designs for genome-wide association studies.
    Nguyen TT; Pahl R; Schäfer H
    Ann Hum Genet; 2009 Nov; 73(Pt 6):638-51. PubMed ID: 19839987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Optimal two-stage genotyping designs for genome-wide association scans.
    Wang H; Thomas DC; Pe'er I; Stram DO
    Genet Epidemiol; 2006 May; 30(4):356-68. PubMed ID: 16607626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The efficacy of detecting variants with small effects on the Affymetrix 6.0 platform using pooled DNA.
    Chiang CW; Gajdos ZK; Korn JM; Butler JL; Hackett R; Guiducci C; Nguyen TT; Wilks R; Forrester T; Henderson KD; Le Marchand L; Henderson BE; Haiman CA; Cooper RS; Lyon HN; Zhu X; McKenzie CA; Palmert MR; Hirschhorn JN
    Hum Genet; 2011 Nov; 130(5):607-21. PubMed ID: 21424828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Incorporation of genetic model parameters for cost-effective designs of genetic association studies using DNA pooling.
    Ji F; Finch SJ; Haynes C; Mendell NR; Gordon D
    BMC Genomics; 2007 Jul; 8():238. PubMed ID: 17634103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A permutation test for oligoset DNA pooling studies.
    Huang HY; Lin JH; Lee WC
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0119096. PubMed ID: 25763822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Including sampling and phenotyping costs into the optimization of two stage designs for genomewide association studies.
    Müller HH; Pahl R; Schäfer H
    Genet Epidemiol; 2007 Dec; 31(8):844-52. PubMed ID: 17549751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Joint analysis is more efficient than replication-based analysis for two-stage genome-wide association studies.
    Skol AD; Scott LJ; Abecasis GR; Boehnke M
    Nat Genet; 2006 Feb; 38(2):209-13. PubMed ID: 16415888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The impacts of errors in individual genotyping and DNA pooling on association studies.
    Zou G; Zhao H
    Genet Epidemiol; 2004 Jan; 26(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 14691952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On the use of DNA pooling to estimate haplotype frequencies.
    Wang S; Kidd KK; Zhao H
    Genet Epidemiol; 2003 Jan; 24(1):74-82. PubMed ID: 12508258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optimal multistage designs--a general framework for efficient genome-wide association studies.
    Pahl R; Schäfer H; Müller HH
    Biostatistics; 2009 Apr; 10(2):297-309. PubMed ID: 19075295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Optimal two-stage design for case-control association analysis incorporating genotyping errors.
    Zuo Y; Zou G; Wang J; Zhao H; Liang H
    Ann Hum Genet; 2008 May; 72(Pt 3):375-87. PubMed ID: 18215207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Identification of susceptibility genes for complex diseases using pooling-based genome-wide association scans.
    Bossé Y; Bacot F; Montpetit A; Rung J; Qu HQ; Engert JC; Polychronakos C; Hudson TJ; Froguel P; Sladek R; Desrosiers M
    Hum Genet; 2009 Apr; 125(3):305-18. PubMed ID: 19184112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Two-stage designs in case-control association analysis.
    Zuo Y; Zou G; Zhao H
    Genetics; 2006 Jul; 173(3):1747-60. PubMed ID: 16624925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Practical capability and cost effectiveness of a DNA pool-based genome-wide association study using BovineSNP50 array in a cattle population.
    Uemoto Y; Sasago N; Abe T; Okada H; Maruoka H; Nakajima H; Shoji N; Maruyama S; Kobayashi N; Mannen H; Kobayashi E
    Anim Sci J; 2012 Nov; 83(11):719-26. PubMed ID: 23126324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Most pooling variation in array-based DNA pooling is attributable to array error rather than pool construction error.
    Macgregor S
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2007 Apr; 15(4):501-4. PubMed ID: 17264871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A genome-wide scan of 1842 DNA markers for allelic associations with general cognitive ability: a five-stage design using DNA pooling and extreme selected groups.
    Plomin R; Hill L; Craig IW; McGuffin P; Purcell S; Sham P; Lubinski D; Thompson LA; Fisher PJ; Turic D; Owen MJ
    Behav Genet; 2001 Nov; 31(6):497-509. PubMed ID: 11838529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact and quantification of the sources of error in DNA pooling designs.
    Jawaid A; Sham P
    Ann Hum Genet; 2009 Jan; 73(1):118-24. PubMed ID: 18945289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optimum two-stage designs in case-control association studies using false discovery rate.
    Kuchiba A; Tanaka NY; Ohashi Y
    J Hum Genet; 2006; 51(12):1046-1054. PubMed ID: 17003959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.