618 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18931643)
21. Effects of phase duration and pulse rate on loudness and pitch percepts in the first auditory midbrain implant patients: Comparison to cochlear implant and auditory brainstem implant results.
Lim HH; Lenarz T; Joseph G; Battmer RD; Patrick JF; Lenarz M
Neuroscience; 2008 Jun; 154(1):370-80. PubMed ID: 18384971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Auditory brainstem implants for neurofibromatosis type 2.
Colletti L; Shannon R; Colletti V
Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2012 Oct; 20(5):353-7. PubMed ID: 22886036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Clinical application of the multichannel auditory brainstem implant].
Wu H; Sterkers O; Rey A; Bouccara D
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2000 Apr; 35(2):123-5. PubMed ID: 12768669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Electrode Selection and Speech Understanding in Patients With Auditory Brainstem Implants.
McKay CM; Azadpour M; Jayewardene-Aston D; O'Driscoll M; El-Deredy W
Ear Hear; 2015; 36(4):454-63. PubMed ID: 25668392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Auditory brainstem activity and development evoked by apical versus basal cochlear implant electrode stimulation in children.
Gordon KA; Papsin BC; Harrison RV
Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Aug; 118(8):1671-84. PubMed ID: 17588811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Auditory brainstem implants in neurofibromatosis Type 2: is open speech perception feasible?
Matthies C; Brill S; Varallyay C; Solymosi L; Gelbrich G; Roosen K; Ernestus RI; Helms J; Hagen R; Mlynski R; Shehata-Dieler W; Müller J
J Neurosurg; 2014 Feb; 120(2):546-58. PubMed ID: 24329026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effects of programming threshold and maplaw settings on acoustic thresholds and speech discrimination with the MED-EL COMBI 40+ cochlear implant.
Boyd PJ
Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):608-18. PubMed ID: 17086073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Modiolar coiling, electrical thresholds, and speech perception after cochlear implantation using the nucleus contour advance electrode with the advance off stylet technique.
Huang TC; Reitzen SD; Marrinan MS; Waltzman SB; Roland JT
Otol Neurotol; 2006 Feb; 27(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 16436984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comprehensive evaluation of a child with an auditory brainstem implant.
Eisenberg LS; Johnson KC; Martinez AS; DesJardin JL; Stika CJ; Dzubak D; Mahalak ML; Rector EP
Otol Neurotol; 2008 Feb; 29(2):251-7. PubMed ID: 18025999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Cochlear implantation in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2 and bilateral vestibular schwannoma.
Lustig LR; Yeagle J; Driscoll CL; Blevins N; Francis H; Niparko JK
Otol Neurotol; 2006 Jun; 27(4):512-8. PubMed ID: 16791043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Nonverbal cognitive abilities and auditory performance in children fitted with auditory brainstem implants: preliminary report.
Colletti L; Zoccante L
Laryngoscope; 2008 Aug; 118(8):1443-8. PubMed ID: 18496153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults.
Laske RD; Veraguth D; Dillier N; Binkert A; Holzmann D; Huber AM
Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 19318885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Cochlear implantation outcome in prelingually deafened young adults. A speech perception study.
Santarelli R; De Filippi R; Genovese E; Arslan E
Audiol Neurootol; 2008; 13(4):257-65. PubMed ID: 18259078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Auditory prostheses research with multiple channel intracochlear stimulation in man.
Eddington DK; Dobelle WH; Brackmann DE; Mladejovsky MG; Parkin JL
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1978; 87(6 Pt 2):1-39. PubMed ID: 736424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Outcomes in nontumor adults fitted with the auditory brainstem implant: 10 years' experience.
Colletti V; Shannon R; Carner M; Veronese S; Colletti L
Otol Neurotol; 2009 Aug; 30(5):614-8. PubMed ID: 19546832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Auditory outcomes in tumor vs. nontumor patients fitted with auditory brainstem implants.
Colletti V
Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2006; 64():167-185. PubMed ID: 16891842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The intensity-pitch relation revisited: monopolar versus bipolar cochlear stimulation.
Arnoldner C; Riss D; Kaider A; Mair A; Wagenblast J; Baumgartner WD; Gstöttner W; Hamzavi JS
Laryngoscope; 2008 Sep; 118(9):1630-6. PubMed ID: 18545213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Music perception of cochlear implant users compared with that of hearing aid users.
Looi V; McDermott H; McKay C; Hickson L
Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):421-34. PubMed ID: 18344870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The effect of frequency allocation on phoneme recognition with the nucleus 22 cochlear implant.
Friesen LM; Shannon RV; Slattery WH
Am J Otol; 1999 Nov; 20(6):729-34. PubMed ID: 10565716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. New outcomes with auditory brainstem implants in NF2 patients.
Behr R; Colletti V; Matthies C; Morita A; Nakatomi H; Dominique L; Darrouzet V; Brill S; Shehata-Dieler W; Lorens A; Skarzynski H
Otol Neurotol; 2014 Dec; 35(10):1844-51. PubMed ID: 25325841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
