These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. [The value of modern biological methods in the diagnosis of jaundice with retention]. FAUVERT R Sem Hop Inf; 1947 Dec; 23(45):2772. PubMed ID: 18916674 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [The value of modern biological methods in the diagnosis of jaundice with retention]. FAUVERT R Arch Mal Appar Dig Mal Nutr; 1947; 36(7-8):322-33. PubMed ID: 18905029 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Comparative value of clinical and biological signs in the diagnosis of jaundice with retention]. CAROLI J Sem Hop Inf; 1947 Dec; 23(45):2774. PubMed ID: 18916676 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Comparative value of clinical and biological signs in the diagnosis of jaundice with retention]. CAROLI J Arch Mal Appar Dig Mal Nutr; 1947; 36(7-8):335-49. PubMed ID: 18905030 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The diagnosis of surgical jaundice. SCHULENBURG CA Cent Afr J Med; 1958 Feb; 4(2):61-3. PubMed ID: 13511431 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [A new flocculation test in the differential diagnosis of hepatocellular and obstructive jaundice]. SABELLA G; PALLADINO O Rass Fisiopatol Clin Ter; 1961 Mar; 33():210-26. PubMed ID: 14495778 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Serum lipids and jaundice. LINDHOLM H Acta Med Scand; 1956 Dec; 156(2):121-30. PubMed ID: 13381425 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Differential diagnosis of regurgitation jaundice; the role of needle liver biopsy. MOVITT ER Ann Intern Med; 1954 May; 40(5):932-51. PubMed ID: 13159068 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Differential diagnosis of jaundice: report of a prospective study of 61 proved cases. SCHENKER S; BALINT J; SCHIFF L Am J Dig Dis; 1962 May; 7():449-63. PubMed ID: 13991584 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical versus acturial prediction in the differential diagnosis of jaundice. A stdy of the relative accuracy of predictions made by physicians and by a statistically derived formula in differentiating parenchymal and obstructive jaundice. MARTIN WB; APOSTOLAKOS PC; ROAZEN H Am J Med Sci; 1960 Nov; 240():571-8. PubMed ID: 13767416 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The differential diagnosis of obstructive and non-obstructive jaundice utilizing serum alkaline phosphatase levels. OCHSNER JL Med Bull (Ann Arbor); 1956 Jul; 22(7):310-4. PubMed ID: 13361130 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [The relation between serum glutamic oxalacetic transaminase and alkaline phosphatase in jaundice. Its value for the differential diagnosis of parenchymatous and obstructive jaundice]. JORGENSEN F; MADSEN S Nord Med; 1960 Dec; 64():1587-9. PubMed ID: 13790702 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Fluorescein injection into extrahepatic biliary ducts for differential diagnosis of obstructive and non-obstructive jaundice. BELMONTE JV; CANGELOSI JP; NARAT JK Burma Med J; 1956 Jul; 4(3):29-30. PubMed ID: 13356168 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [The value of polarography in the differential diagnosis of hepatocellular and mechanical jaundice]. KASZA L; BUKARESTI L; HADNAGY C; CSIKI I Acta Hepatosplenol; 1961 Apr; 8():95-102. PubMed ID: 13751726 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Discrimination between obstructive and hepatocellular jaundice by means of the commonly used serum tests. HILL E; ZIEVE L Am J Clin Pathol; 1957 Jan; 27(1):6-12. PubMed ID: 13410830 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The differential diagnosis of jaundice. BRIEN FS Univ West Ont Med J; 1948 Jan; 18(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 18903166 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The differential diagnosis of jaundice. NORCROSS JW Surg Clin North Am; 1957 Jun; 37(3):675-82. PubMed ID: 13433273 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]