These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1893543)

  • 1. A comparison of the EH-270 corneal topographer with conventional keratometry.
    Davis LJ; Dresner MS
    CLAO J; 1991 Jul; 17(3):191-6. PubMed ID: 1893543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of the accuracy and reproducibility of the keratometer and the EyeSys Corneal Analysis System Model I.
    Koch DD; Wakil JS; Samuelson SW; Haft EA
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 1992 Jul; 18(4):342-7. PubMed ID: 1501084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy and precision of keratometry, photokeratoscopy, and corneal modeling on calibrated steel balls.
    Hannush SB; Crawford SL; Waring GO; Gemmill MC; Lynn MJ; Nizam A
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1989 Aug; 107(8):1235-9. PubMed ID: 2757555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Practical aspects of a corneal topography system.
    McCarey BE; Zurawski CA; O'Shea DS
    CLAO J; 1992 Oct; 18(4):248-54. PubMed ID: 1424061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of three keratometry instruments.
    Tennen DG; Keates RH; Montoya C
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 1995 Jul; 21(4):407-8. PubMed ID: 8523284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Measurement of the radius of corneal curvature with the Maloney surgical keratometer and an on-line keratometer imagery processing system].
    Igarashi S; Yoshida A; Igarashi H; Kojima M
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 1993 Jan; 97(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 8434540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Short- and long-term repeatability of Visioptic Alcon EyeMap (Visioptic EH-270) corneal topographer on normal human corneas.
    Younes M; Boltz R; Leach NE; Bedell H
    Optom Vis Sci; 1995 Nov; 72(11):838-44. PubMed ID: 8587773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy and precision of the corneal analysis system and the topographic modeling system.
    Wilson SE; Verity SM; Conger DL
    Cornea; 1992 Jan; 11(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 1559344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intraoperative PAR corneal topography system (CTS): comparison of its keratometric readings to manual keratometer, auto-keratometer, EyeSys Corneal Analysis system, and slit lamp PAR CTS in healthy eyes.
    Uçakhan OO; Sternberg G; Bodian C; Kelliher K; Asbell PA
    CLAO J; 2000 Jul; 26(3):151-8. PubMed ID: 10946987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Corneal EyeSys System: accuracy analysis and reproducibility of first-generation prototype.
    Koch DD; Foulks GN; Moran CT; Wakil JS
    Refract Corneal Surg; 1989; 5(6):424-9. PubMed ID: 2488842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of three computerized videokeratoscopy systems with keratometry.
    Moura RC; Bowyer BL; Stevens SX; Rowsey JJ
    Cornea; 1998 Sep; 17(5):522-8. PubMed ID: 9756447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of the TMS-1 and the corneal analysis system for the evaluation of abnormal corneas.
    Antalis JJ; Lembach RG; Carney LG
    CLAO J; 1993 Jan; 19(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 8453755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of keratometric readings as obtained by Javal Ophthalmometer and Corneal Analysis System (EyeSys).
    Tsilimbaris MK; Vlachonikolis IG; Siganos D; Makridakis G; Pallikaris IG
    Refract Corneal Surg; 1991; 7(5):368-73. PubMed ID: 1958623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Methods of analysis of corneal topography.
    Klyce SD; Wilson SE
    Refract Corneal Surg; 1989; 5(6):368-71. PubMed ID: 2488833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of keratometry with a novel Color-LED corneal topographer.
    Klijn S; Reus NJ; Sicam VA
    J Refract Surg; 2015 Apr; 31(4):249-56. PubMed ID: 25884580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of keratoconus grades on repeatability of keratometry readings: Comparison of 5 devices.
    Hashemi H; Yekta A; Khabazkhoob M
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 May; 41(5):1065-72. PubMed ID: 26049838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Keratometry evaluations with the Pentacam high resolution in comparison with the automated keratometry and conventional corneal topography.
    Módis L; Szalai E; Kolozsvári B; Németh G; Vajas A; Berta A
    Cornea; 2012 Jan; 31(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 22081146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Corneal power measurements in fixating versus anesthetized nonfixating children using a handheld keratometer.
    Rogers DL; Whitehead GR; Stephens JA; Fellows RR; Bremer DL; McGregor ML; Golden RP; Cassady CB; Rogers GL
    J AAPOS; 2010 Feb; 14(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 20227615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modification, calibration, and comparative testing of an automated surgical keratometer.
    Simon G; Parel JM; Nose I; Lee W
    Refract Corneal Surg; 1991; 7(2):151-60. PubMed ID: 2043560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The evaluation of normal corneal topography in emmetropic eyes with computer-assisted videokeratography.
    Kanpolat A; Simşek T; Alp NM
    CLAO J; 1997 Jul; 23(3):168-71. PubMed ID: 9240827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.