These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

347 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18935788)

  • 1. Dental impressions using 3D digital scanners: virtual becomes reality.
    Birnbaum NS; Aaronson HB
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2008 Oct; 29(8):494, 496, 498-505. PubMed ID: 18935788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Digital dentistry: innovation for restorative treatment.
    Fasbinder DJ
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2010; 31 Spec No 4():2-11; quiz 12. PubMed ID: 21049823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Direct mechanical data acquisition of dental impressions for the manufacturing of CAD/CAM restorations.
    Quaas S; Rudolph H; Luthardt RG
    J Dent; 2007 Dec; 35(12):903-8. PubMed ID: 17980951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Digitization of simulated clinical dental impressions: virtual three-dimensional analysis of exactness.
    Persson AS; Odén A; Andersson M; Sandborgh-Englund G
    Dent Mater; 2009 Jul; 25(7):929-36. PubMed ID: 19264353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of complete-arch dental impressions: a new method of measuring trueness and precision.
    Ender A; Mehl A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Feb; 109(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 23395338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinicians reaping benefits of new concepts in impressioning.
    Lawson NC; Burgess JO
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2015 Feb; 36(2):152-3. PubMed ID: 25822643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Precision of intraoral digital dental impressions with iTero and extraoral digitization with the iTero and a model scanner.
    Flügge TV; Schlager S; Nelson K; Nahles S; Metzger MC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Sep; 144(3):471-8. PubMed ID: 23992820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cadent iTero's digital system for dental impressions: the end of trays and putty?
    Garg AK
    Dent Implantol Update; 2008 Jan; 19(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 18399300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using digital technology to enhance restorative dentistry.
    Fasbinder D
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2012 Oct; 33(9):666-8, 670, 672 passim. PubMed ID: 23030729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Virtual study models: a comparison of modular application systems.
    Favero L; Terrazzani C; Favero V; Stellini E; Cocilovo F
    Prog Orthod; 2009; 10(2):16-25. PubMed ID: 20545088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of fixed prostheses generated from conventional vs digitally scanned dental impressions.
    Henkel GL
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2007 Aug; 28(8):422-4, 426-8, 430-1. PubMed ID: 18578100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. 3D surface imaging in dentistry - what we are looking at.
    Ireland AJ; McNamara C; Clover MJ; House K; Wenger N; Barbour ME; Alemzadeh K; Zhang L; Sandy JR
    Br Dent J; 2008 Oct; 205(7):387-92. PubMed ID: 18849941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intraoral Digital Impressioning for Dental Implant Restorations Versus Traditional Implant Impression Techniques.
    Wilk BL
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2015; 36(7):529-30, 532-3. PubMed ID: 26247446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Computer-aided analysis of the influence of digitizing and surfacing on the accuracy in dental CAD/CAM technology.
    Rudolph H; Luthardt RG; Walter MH
    Comput Biol Med; 2007 May; 37(5):579-87. PubMed ID: 16844107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Chairside multi-unit restoration of a quadrant using the new Cerec 3D software.
    Ender A; Wiedhahn K; Mörmann WH
    Int J Comput Dent; 2003 Jan; 6(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 12838593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Three-dimensional evaluation of the repeatability of scanned conventional impressions of prepared teeth generated with white- and blue-light scanners.
    Jeon JH; Choi BY; Kim CM; Kim JH; Kim HY; Kim WC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Oct; 114(4):549-53. PubMed ID: 26182854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of the trueness and precision of complete arch digital impressions on a human maxilla using seven different intraoral digital impression systems and a laboratory scanner.
    Mennito AS; Evans ZP; Nash J; Bocklet C; Lauer Kelly A; Bacro T; Cayouette M; Ludlow M; Renne WG
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2019 Jul; 31(4):369-377. PubMed ID: 31058428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Creating well-fitting restorations with a digital impression system.
    Smith R
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2010 Oct; 31(8):640-4. PubMed ID: 20960994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The use of a 3D laser scanner using superimpositional software to assess the accuracy of impression techniques.
    Shah S; Sundaram G; Bartlett D; Sherriff M
    J Dent; 2004 Nov; 32(8):653-8. PubMed ID: 15476960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optical impression systems for CAD-CAM restorations.
    Galhano GÁ; Pellizzer EP; Mazaro JV
    J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Nov; 23(6):e575-9. PubMed ID: 23172483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.