175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18936310)
1. Suspicious breast lesions: assessment of 3D Doppler US indexes for classification in a test population and fourfold cross-validation scheme.
LeCarpentier GL; Roubidoux MA; Fowlkes JB; Krücker JF; Hunt KA; Paramagul C; Johnson TD; Thorson NJ; Engle KD; Carson PL
Radiology; 2008 Nov; 249(2):463-70. PubMed ID: 18936310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Discrimination of sonographically detected breast masses using frequency shift color Doppler imaging in combination with age and gray scale criteria.
Bhatti PT; LeCarpentier GL; Roubidoux MA; Fowlkes JB; Helvie MA; Carson PL
J Ultrasound Med; 2001 Apr; 20(4):343-50. PubMed ID: 11316312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Distinguishing benign from malignant masses at breast US: combined US elastography and color doppler US--influence on radiologist accuracy.
Cho N; Jang M; Lyou CY; Park JS; Choi HY; Moon WK
Radiology; 2012 Jan; 262(1):80-90. PubMed ID: 22084209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantitative vascularity of breast masses by Doppler imaging: regional variations and diagnostic implications.
Sehgal CM; Arger PH; Rowling SE; Conant EF; Reynolds C; Patton JA
J Ultrasound Med; 2000 Jul; 19(7):427-40; quiz 441-2. PubMed ID: 10898296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Characterization of benign and malignant solid breast masses: harmonic versus nonharmonic 3D power Doppler imaging.
Hsiao YH; Huang YL; Liang WM; Lin C; Kuo SJ; Chen DR
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2009 Mar; 35(3):353-9. PubMed ID: 19041173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The utility of ultrasound superb microvascular imaging for evaluation of breast tumour vascularity: comparison with colour and power Doppler imaging regarding diagnostic performance.
Park AY; Seo BK; Woo OH; Jung KS; Cho KR; Park EK; Cha SH; Cha J
Clin Radiol; 2018 Mar; 73(3):304-311. PubMed ID: 29122223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of 3D and 2D shear-wave elastography for differentiating benign and malignant breast masses: focus on the diagnostic performance.
Choi HY; Sohn YM; Seo M
Clin Radiol; 2017 Oct; 72(10):878-886. PubMed ID: 28526455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Characterization of sonographically detected breast lesions using three-dimensional data sets].
Fischer T; Filimonow S; Hamm B; Slowinski T; Thomas A
Rofo; 2006 Dec; 178(12):1224-34. PubMed ID: 17136646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Malignant and benign breast masses on 3D US volumetric images: effect of computer-aided diagnosis on radiologist accuracy.
Sahiner B; Chan HP; Roubidoux MA; Hadjiiski LM; Helvie MA; Paramagul C; Bailey J; Nees AV; Blane C
Radiology; 2007 Mar; 242(3):716-24. PubMed ID: 17244717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A combined ultrasonic B-mode and color Doppler system for the classification of breast masses using neural network.
Qian X; Zhang B; Liu S; Wang Y; Chen X; Liu J; Yang Y; Chen X; Wei Y; Xiao Q; Ma J; Shung KK; Zhou Q; Liu L; Chen Z
Eur Radiol; 2020 May; 30(5):3023-3033. PubMed ID: 32006174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. 3D quantitative breast ultrasound analysis for differentiating fibroadenomas and carcinomas smaller than 1cm.
Meel-van den Abeelen AS; Weijers G; van Zelst JC; Thijssen JM; Mann RM; de Korte CL
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Mar; 88():141-147. PubMed ID: 28189199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Breast lesions: imaging with contrast-enhanced subharmonic US--initial experience.
Forsberg F; Piccoli CW; Merton DA; Palazzo JJ; Hall AL
Radiology; 2007 Sep; 244(3):718-26. PubMed ID: 17690324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Solid breast masses: neural network analysis of vascular features at three-dimensional power Doppler US for benign or malignant classification.
Chang RF; Huang SF; Moon WK; Lee YH; Chen DR
Radiology; 2007 Apr; 243(1):56-62. PubMed ID: 17312276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intra-tumor flow index can predict the malignant potential of breast tumor: dependent on age and volume.
Hsiao YH; Kuo SJ; Liang WM; Huang YL; Chen DR
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2008 Jan; 34(1):88-95. PubMed ID: 17720297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Characterization of benign and malignant solid breast masses in harmonic 3D power Doppler imaging.
Hsiao YH; Huang YL; Kuo SJ; Liang WM; Chen ST; Chen DR
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Jul; 71(1):89-95. PubMed ID: 18479868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnosis of solid breast tumors using vessel analysis in three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound images.
Huang YH; Chen JH; Chang YC; Huang CS; Moon WK; Kuo WJ; Lai KJ; Chang RF
J Digit Imaging; 2013 Aug; 26(4):731-9. PubMed ID: 23296913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Computer-aided diagnosis for breast tumors by using vascularization of 3-D power Doppler ultrasound.
Huang YL; Kuo SJ; Hsu CC; Tseng HS; Hsiao YH; Chen DR
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2009 Oct; 35(10):1607-14. PubMed ID: 19647918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative analysis of logistic regression, support vector machine and artificial neural network for the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant solid breast tumors by the use of three-dimensional power Doppler imaging.
Chen ST; Hsiao YH; Huang YL; Kuo SJ; Tseng HS; Wu HK; Chen DR
Korean J Radiol; 2009; 10(5):464-71. PubMed ID: 19721831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Does power Doppler ultrasonography improve the BI-RADS category assessment and diagnostic accuracy of solid breast lesions?
Tozaki M; Fukuma E
Acta Radiol; 2011 Sep; 52(7):706-10. PubMed ID: 21596798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Breast mass lesions: computer-aided diagnosis models with mammographic and sonographic descriptors.
Jesneck JL; Lo JY; Baker JA
Radiology; 2007 Aug; 244(2):390-8. PubMed ID: 17562812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
