3142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18936373)
1. Occlusive vs gauze dressings for local wound care in surgical patients: a randomized clinical trial.
Ubbink DT; Vermeulen H; Goossens A; Kelner RB; Schreuder SM; Lubbers MJ
Arch Surg; 2008 Oct; 143(10):950-5. PubMed ID: 18936373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of homecare costs of local wound care in surgical patients randomized between occlusive and gauze dressings.
Ubbink DT; Vermeulen H; van Hattem J
J Clin Nurs; 2008 Mar; 17(5):593-601. PubMed ID: 18279292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Modern wound care for the poor: a randomized clinical trial comparing the vacuum system with conventional saline-soaked gauze dressings.
Perez D; Bramkamp M; Exe C; von Ruden C; Ziegler A
Am J Surg; 2010 Jan; 199(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 19362288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Hydrocolloid versus saline-gauze dressings in treating pressure ulcers: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Xakellis GC; Chrischilles EA
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1992 May; 73(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 1580775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Do patient and nurse outcome differences exist between 2 negative pressure wound therapy systems?
Albert NM; Rock R; Sammon MA; Bena JF; Morrison SL; Whitman A; Kato I; Landis-Erdman JC
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2012; 39(3):259-66. PubMed ID: 22552107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of occlusive and conventional gauze dressings on incisional healing after abdominal operations.
Holm C; Petersen JS; Grønboek F; Gottrup F
Eur J Surg; 1998 Mar; 164(3):179-83. PubMed ID: 9562277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Modelling the cost implications of using carboxymethylcellulose dressing compared with gauze in the management of surgical wounds healing by secondary intention in the US and UK.
Guest JF; Ruiz FJ
Curr Med Res Opin; 2005 Feb; 21(2):281-90. PubMed ID: 15801999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Comparison of the effectiveness and cost of treatment with humid environment as compared to traditional cure. Clinical trial on primary care patients with venous leg ulcers and pressure ulcers].
Capillas Pérez R; Cabré Aguilar V; Gil Colomé AM; Gaitano García A; Torra i Bou JE
Rev Enferm; 2000 Jan; 23(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 10788945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hydrocolloid dressing in pediatric burns may decrease operative intervention rates.
Martin FT; O'Sullivan JB; Regan PJ; McCann J; Kelly JL
J Pediatr Surg; 2010 Mar; 45(3):600-5. PubMed ID: 20223327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A prospective, randomized clinical trial to assess the cost-effectiveness of a modern foam dressing versus a traditional saline gauze dressing in the treatment of stage II pressure ulcers.
Payne WG; Posnett J; Alvarez O; Brown-Etris M; Jameson G; Wolcott R; Dharma H; Hartwell S; Ochs D
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2009 Feb; 55(2):50-5. PubMed ID: 19246785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Comparison of Three Dressing Methods for Pilonidal Sinus Surgery Wound Healing.
Sadati L; Froozesh R; Beyrami A; Khaneghah ZN; Elahi SA; Asl MF; Salehi T
Adv Skin Wound Care; 2019 Jul; 32(7):1-5. PubMed ID: 31232840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hydrocolloid dressing versus tulle gauze in the treatment of abrasions in cyclists.
Hermans MH
Int J Sports Med; 1991 Dec; 12(6):581-4. PubMed ID: 1797702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [New therapeutic strategies for the treatment of difficult wounds].
Onesti MG; Bitonti A; Fino P; Ciotti M; Scuderi N
G Chir; 2008 May; 29(5):212-20. PubMed ID: 18507956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Randomized clinical trial of donor-site wound dressings after split-skin grafting.
Brölmann FE; Eskes AM; Goslings JC; Niessen FB; de Bree R; Vahl AC; Pierik EG; Vermeulen H; Ubbink DT;
Br J Surg; 2013 Apr; 100(5):619-27. PubMed ID: 23460253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of hydrocolloid dressings on healing by second intention after excision of pilonidal sinus.
Viciano V; Castera JE; Medrano J; Aguiló J; Torro J; Botella MG; Toldrá N
Eur J Surg; 2000 Mar; 166(3):229-32. PubMed ID: 10755338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Using a silver-coated polymeric substrate for the management of chronic ulcerations: the initial Mayo Clinic experience.
Moore RA; Liedl DA; Jenkins S; Andrews KL
Adv Skin Wound Care; 2008 Nov; 21(11):517-20. PubMed ID: 18981754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Alginate dressing and polyurethane film versus paraffin gauze in the treatment of split-thickness skin graft donor sites: a randomized controlled pilot study.
Kaiser D; Hafner J; Mayer D; French LE; Läuchli S
Adv Skin Wound Care; 2013 Feb; 26(2):67-73. PubMed ID: 23337646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical evaluation of hydrocolloid dressings for neurosurgical wounds.
Fujimoto Y; Shimooka N; Ohnishi Y; Yoshimine T
Surg Neurol; 2008 Aug; 70(2):217-20; discussion 220. PubMed ID: 18262632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A prospective, randomized, multisite clinical evaluation of a transparent absorbent acrylic dressing and a hydrocolloid dressing in the management of Stage II and shallow Stage III pressure ulcers.
Brown-Etris M; Milne C; Orsted H; Gates JL; Netsch D; Punchello M; Couture N; Albert M; Attrell E; Freyberg J
Adv Skin Wound Care; 2008 Apr; 21(4):169-74. PubMed ID: 18385577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Occlusive dressing versus petroleum gauze on drainage wounds.
Alsbjörn BF; Ovesen H; Walther-Larsen S
Acta Chir Scand; 1990 Mar; 156(3):211-3. PubMed ID: 2336914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
