BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18937224)

  • 1. Finding factors influencing risk: comparing Bayesian stochastic search and standard variable selection methods applied to logistic regression models of cases and controls.
    Swartz MD; Yu RK; Shete S
    Stat Med; 2008 Dec; 27(29):6158-74. PubMed ID: 18937224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stochastic search variable selection based on two mixture components and continuous-scale weighting.
    Rinta-Aho MJ; Sillanpää MJ
    Biom J; 2019 May; 61(3):729-746. PubMed ID: 30537402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Variable selection and Bayesian model averaging in case-control studies.
    Viallefont V; Raftery AE; Richardson S
    Stat Med; 2001 Nov; 20(21):3215-30. PubMed ID: 11746314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fixed and random effects selection in linear and logistic models.
    Kinney SK; Dunson DB
    Biometrics; 2007 Sep; 63(3):690-8. PubMed ID: 17403104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Integration of elicited expert information via a power prior in Bayesian variable selection: Application to colon cancer data.
    Boulet S; Ursino M; Thall P; Landi B; Lepère C; Pernot S; Burgun A; Taieb J; Zaanan A; Zohar S; Jannot AS
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Feb; 29(2):541-567. PubMed ID: 30963815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bayesian variable selection based on clinical relevance weights in small sample studies-Application to colon cancer.
    Boulet S; Ursino M; Thall P; Jannot AS; Zohar S
    Stat Med; 2019 May; 38(12):2228-2247. PubMed ID: 30672015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparing Bayesian Variable Selection to Lasso Approaches for Applications in Psychology.
    Bainter SA; McCauley TG; Fahmy MM; Goodman ZT; Kupis LB; Rao JS
    Psychometrika; 2023 Sep; 88(3):1032-1055. PubMed ID: 37217762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Part 1. Statistical Learning Methods for the Effects of Multiple Air Pollution Constituents.
    Coull BA; Bobb JF; Wellenius GA; Kioumourtzoglou MA; Mittleman MA; Koutrakis P; Godleski JJ
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2015 Jun; (183 Pt 1-2):5-50. PubMed ID: 26333238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Model selection in medical research: a simulation study comparing Bayesian model averaging and stepwise regression.
    Genell A; Nemes S; Steineck G; Dickman PW
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2010 Dec; 10():108. PubMed ID: 21134252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bayesian Variable Selection in Multilevel Item Response Theory Models with Application in Genomics.
    Fragoso TM; de Andrade M; Pereira AC; Rosa GJ; Soler JM
    Genet Epidemiol; 2016 Apr; 40(3):253-63. PubMed ID: 27027518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bayesian variable selection for latent class models.
    Ghosh J; Herring AH; Siega-Riz AM
    Biometrics; 2011 Sep; 67(3):917-25. PubMed ID: 21039399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Genetic analysis of complex traits via Bayesian variable selection: the utility of a mixture of uniform priors.
    Knürr T; Läärä E; Sillanpää MJ
    Genet Res (Camb); 2011 Aug; 93(4):303-18. PubMed ID: 21767461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of Bayesian model averaging and stepwise methods for model selection in logistic regression.
    Wang D; Zhang W; Bakhai A
    Stat Med; 2004 Nov; 23(22):3451-67. PubMed ID: 15505893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multivariate Bayesian variable selection exploiting dependence structure among outcomes: Application to air pollution effects on DNA methylation.
    Lee KH; Tadesse MG; Baccarelli AA; Schwartz J; Coull BA
    Biometrics; 2017 Mar; 73(1):232-241. PubMed ID: 27377873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bayesian inference for the genetic control of water deficit tolerance in spring wheat by stochastic search variable selection.
    Safari P; Danyali SF; Rahimi M
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Aug; 25(23):23135-23142. PubMed ID: 29860694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Imputation and variable selection in linear regression models with missing covariates.
    Yang X; Belin TR; Boscardin WJ
    Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):498-506. PubMed ID: 16011697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Two-level stochastic search variable selection in GLMs with missing predictors.
    Mitra R; Dunson D
    Int J Biostat; 2010; 6(1):Article 33. PubMed ID: 21969986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].
    Biggeri A; Bellini P; Terracini B;
    Epidemiol Prev; 2001; 25(2 Suppl):1-71. PubMed ID: 11515188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Locating disease genes using Bayesian variable selection with the Haseman-Elston method.
    Oh C; Ye KQ; He Q; Mendell NR
    BMC Genet; 2003 Dec; 4 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S69. PubMed ID: 14975137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.