These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18937838)

  • 1. Evidence-based ethics--what it should be and what it shouldn't.
    Strech D
    BMC Med Ethics; 2008 Oct; 9():16. PubMed ID: 18937838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How factual do we want the facts? Criteria for a critical appraisal of empirical research for use in ethics.
    Strech D
    J Med Ethics; 2010 Apr; 36(4):222-5. PubMed ID: 20338933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Current state of ethics literature synthesis: a systematic review of reviews.
    Mertz M; Kahrass H; Strech D
    BMC Med; 2016 Oct; 14(1):152. PubMed ID: 27716264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Implicit normativity in evidence-based medicine: a plea for integrated empirical ethics research.
    Molewijk AC; Stiggelbout AM; Otten W; Dupuis HM; Kievit J
    Health Care Anal; 2003 Mar; 11(1):69-92. PubMed ID: 14510310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evidence-based medicine and its role in ethical decision-making.
    Borry P; Schotsmans P; Dierickx K
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2006 Jun; 12(3):306-11. PubMed ID: 16722914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. What methods do reviews of normative ethics literature use for search, selection, analysis, and synthesis? In-depth results from a systematic review of reviews.
    Mertz M; Strech D; Kahrass H
    Syst Rev; 2017 Dec; 6(1):261. PubMed ID: 29258598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A platitude too far: 'evidence-based ethics'. Commentary on Borry (2006), Evidence-based medicine and its role in ethical decision-making. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 12, 306-311.
    Loughlin M
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2006 Jun; 12(3):312-8. PubMed ID: 16722915
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evidence-based ethics? On evidence-based practice and the "empirical turn" from normative bioethics.
    Goldenberg MJ
    BMC Med Ethics; 2005 Nov; 6():E11. PubMed ID: 16277663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. What is the role of empirical research in bioethical reflection and decision-making? An ethical analysis.
    Borry P; Schotsmans P; Dierickx K
    Med Health Care Philos; 2004; 7(1):41-53. PubMed ID: 15139254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Argument-based medical ethics: a formal tool for critically appraising the normative medical ethics literature.
    McCullough LB; Coverdale JH; Chervenak FA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Oct; 191(4):1097-102. PubMed ID: 15507927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An update on the "empirical turn" in bioethics: analysis of empirical research in nine bioethics journals.
    Wangmo T; Hauri S; Gennet E; Anane-Sarpong E; Provoost V; Elger BS
    BMC Med Ethics; 2018 Feb; 19(1):6. PubMed ID: 29415709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How to tackle the conundrum of quality appraisal in systematic reviews of normative literature/information? Analysing the problems of three possible strategies (translation of a German paper).
    Mertz M
    BMC Med Ethics; 2019 Nov; 20(1):81. PubMed ID: 31727134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Empirical research in medical ethics: how conceptual accounts on normative-empirical collaboration may improve research practice.
    Salloch S; Schildmann J; Vollmann J
    BMC Med Ethics; 2012 Apr; 13():5. PubMed ID: 22500496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ethics of evidence based medicine in the primary care setting.
    Slowther A; Ford S; Schofield T
    J Med Ethics; 2004 Apr; 30(2):151-5. PubMed ID: 15082808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Does empirical research make bioethics more relevant? "The embedded researcher" as a methodological approach.
    Reiter-Theil S
    Med Health Care Philos; 2004; 7(1):17-29. PubMed ID: 15139252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Systematic reviews of empirical literature on bioethical topics: Results from a meta-review.
    Mertz M; Nobile H; Kahrass H
    Nurs Ethics; 2020 Jun; 27(4):960-978. PubMed ID: 32238039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Integrated empirical ethics: loss of normativity?
    van der Scheer L; Widdershoven G
    Med Health Care Philos; 2004; 7(1):71-9. PubMed ID: 15139256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The normative background of empirical-ethical research: first steps towards a transparent and reasoned approach in the selection of an ethical theory.
    Salloch S; Wäscher S; Vollmann J; Schildmann J
    BMC Med Ethics; 2015 Apr; 16():20. PubMed ID: 25889221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Empirical research in medical ethics: an introduction.
    Arnold RM; Forrow L
    Theor Med; 1993 Sep; 14(3):195-6. PubMed ID: 11643189
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.