These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18938280)

  • 21. Argument Strength and the Persuasiveness of Stories.
    Schreiner C; Appel M; Isberner MB; Richter T
    Discourse Process; 2018; 55(4):371-386. PubMed ID: 29805322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The illusion of argument justification.
    Fisher M; Keil FC
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Feb; 143(1):425-33. PubMed ID: 23506085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Developing a Conversational Agent's Capability to Identify Structural Wrongness in Arguments Based on Toulmin's Model of Arguments.
    Mirzababaei B; Pammer-Schindler V
    Front Artif Intell; 2021; 4():645516. PubMed ID: 34927062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Judgments of grammaticality of sentences with a differing number of arguments: a comparison of English and Japanese speakers.
    Nagata H; Bain B
    Percept Mot Skills; 2000 Oct; 91(2):503-11. PubMed ID: 11065310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. How argumentation theory can inform assessment validity: A critical review.
    Kinnear B; Schumacher DJ; Driessen EW; Varpio L
    Med Educ; 2022 Nov; 56(11):1064-1075. PubMed ID: 35851965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Evaluation of arguments in research reports].
    Botes A
    Curationis; 1999 Jun; 22(2):10-9. PubMed ID: 11040614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Social values as arguments: similar is convincing.
    Maio GR; Hahn U; Frost JM; Kuppens T; Rehman N; Kamble S
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():829. PubMed ID: 25147529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Argument structure, argument content, and cognitive change in children's peer interaction.
    Leman PJ
    J Genet Psychol; 2002 Mar; 163(1):40-57. PubMed ID: 11952263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Judgments of grammaticality of Japanese simple sentences involving two arguments in a whole-part relation: a further examination of Chomsky's principle of Full Interpretation.
    Nagata H
    Percept Mot Skills; 2006 Jun; 102(3):855-70. PubMed ID: 16916165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The logic-bias effect: The role of effortful processing in the resolution of belief-logic conflict.
    Howarth S; Handley SJ; Walsh C
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Feb; 44(2):330-49. PubMed ID: 26390872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Leaping to Conclusions: Why Premise Relevance Affects Argument Strength.
    Ransom KJ; Perfors A; Navarro DJ
    Cogn Sci; 2016 Sep; 40(7):1775-1796. PubMed ID: 26471503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Distraction Effects of Smoking Cues in Antismoking Messages: Examining Resource Allocation to Message Processing as a Function of Smoking Cues and Argument Strength.
    Lee S; Cappella JN
    Media Psychol; 2013; 16(2):154-176. PubMed ID: 25477766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Examining causal components and a mediating process underlying self-generated health arguments for exercise and smoking cessation.
    Baldwin AS; Rothman AJ; Vander Weg MW; Christensen AJ
    Health Psychol; 2013 Dec; 32(12):1209-17. PubMed ID: 23025303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Cognitive "Category-Based Induction" Research and Social "Persuasion" Research Are Each About What Makes Arguments Believable: A Tale of Two Literatures.
    Ranganath KA; Spellman BA; Joy-Gaba JA
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2010 Mar; 5(2):115-22. PubMed ID: 26162119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The impact of repetition-induced familiarity on agreement with weak and strong arguments.
    Moons WG; Mackie DM; Garcia-Marques T
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2009 Jan; 96(1):32-44. PubMed ID: 19210062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Justifications for coercive care in child and adolescent psychiatry, a content analysis of medical documentation in Sweden.
    Pelto-Piri V; Kjellin L; Lindvall C; Engström I
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2016 Feb; 16():66. PubMed ID: 26893126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Modeling the effects of argument length and validity on inductive and deductive reasoning.
    Rotello CM; Heit E
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1317-30. PubMed ID: 19686024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The material theory of induction and the epistemology of thought experiments.
    Stuart MT
    Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2020 Oct; 83():17-27. PubMed ID: 32958277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The Argument Web: an Online Ecosystem of Tools, Systems and Services for Argumentation.
    Reed C; Budzynska K; Duthie R; Janier M; Konat B; Lawrence J; Pease A; Snaith M
    Philos Technol; 2017; 30(2):137-160. PubMed ID: 32025475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Belief bias is response bias: Evidence from a two-step signal detection model.
    Stephens RG; Dunn JC; Hayes BK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Feb; 45(2):320-332. PubMed ID: 30047766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.