These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18938284)

  • 1. Observed attention allocation processes in category learning.
    Matsuka T; Corter JE
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Jul; 61(7):1067-97. PubMed ID: 18938284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Eyetracking and selective attention in category learning.
    Rehder B; Hoffman AB
    Cogn Psychol; 2005 Aug; 51(1):1-41. PubMed ID: 16039934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Attending to multiple visual streams: interactions between location-based and category-based attentional selection.
    Fagioli S; Macaluso E
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Aug; 21(8):1628-41. PubMed ID: 18823252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Learning what to learn: the effects of task experience on strategy shifts in the allocation of study time.
    Ariel R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Nov; 39(6):1697-1711. PubMed ID: 23751010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Learning about the internal structure of categories through classification and feature inference.
    Jee BD; Wiley J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(9):1786-807. PubMed ID: 24320007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On the malleability of automatic attentional biases: effects of feature-specific attention allocation.
    Everaert T; Spruyt A; De Houwer J
    Cogn Emot; 2013; 27(3):385-400. PubMed ID: 22894752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prior knowledge enhances the category dimensionality effect.
    Hoffman AB; Harris HD; Murphy GL
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Mar; 36(2):256-70. PubMed ID: 18426059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The sequence of study changes what information is attended to, encoded, and remembered during category learning.
    Carvalho PF; Goldstone RL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Nov; 43(11):1699-1719. PubMed ID: 28333507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How prior knowledge affects selective attention during category learning: an eyetracking study.
    Kim S; Rehder B
    Mem Cognit; 2011 May; 39(4):649-65. PubMed ID: 21264587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Semantic contextual cuing and visual attention.
    Goujon A; Didierjean A; Marmèche E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Feb; 35(1):50-71. PubMed ID: 19170470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of category learning on attentional modulation of visual cortex.
    Folstein JR; Fuller K; Howard D; DePatie T
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Sep; 104():18-30. PubMed ID: 28754490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Adaptive categorization in unsupervised learning.
    Clapper JP; Bower GH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Sep; 28(5):908-923. PubMed ID: 12219798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stimulus modality interacts with category structure in perceptual category learning.
    Maddox WT; Ing AD; Lauritzen JS
    Percept Psychophys; 2006 Oct; 68(7):1176-90. PubMed ID: 17355041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Diversion of attention in everyday concept learning: identification in the service of use.
    Brooks LR; Squire-Graydon R; Wood TJ
    Mem Cognit; 2007 Jan; 35(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 17533875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Task and distribution sampling affect auditory category learning.
    Roark CL; Holt LL
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Oct; 80(7):1804-1822. PubMed ID: 29968085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Temporal characteristics of overt attentional behavior during category learning.
    Chen L; Meier KM; Blair MR; Watson MR; Wood MJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Feb; 75(2):244-56. PubMed ID: 23151960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Consider the category: The effect of spacing depends on individual learning histories.
    Slone LK; Sandhofer CM
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2017 Jul; 159():34-49. PubMed ID: 28266333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Social cues modulate the representations underlying cross-situational learning.
    MacDonald K; Yurovsky D; Frank MC
    Cogn Psychol; 2017 May; 94():67-84. PubMed ID: 28288392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Statistical learning is constrained to less abstract patterns in complex sensory input (but not the least).
    Emberson LL; Rubinstein DY
    Cognition; 2016 Aug; 153():63-78. PubMed ID: 27139779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Unsupervised category learning with integral-dimension stimuli.
    Ell SW; Ashby FG; Hutchinson S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(8):1537-62. PubMed ID: 22506861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.