These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18940106)

  • 21. An inferential confidence interval method of establishing statistical equivalence that corrects Tryon's (2001) reduction factor.
    Tryon WW; Lewis C
    Psychol Methods; 2008 Sep; 13(3):272-7. PubMed ID: 18778155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Pairwise multiple comparisons: a model comparison approach versus stepwise procedures.
    Cribbie RA; Keselman HJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2003 May; 56(Pt 1):167-82. PubMed ID: 12803829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. An improved effect size for single-case research: nonoverlap of all pairs.
    Parker RI; Vannest K
    Behav Ther; 2009 Dec; 40(4):357-67. PubMed ID: 19892081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Interval estimates of weighted effect sizes in the one-way heteroscedastic ANOVA.
    Kulinskaya E; Staudte RG
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2006 May; 59(Pt 1):97-111. PubMed ID: 16709281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Estimating standardized linear contrasts of means with desired precision.
    Bonett DG
    Psychol Methods; 2009 Mar; 14(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 19271844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Adaptive robust estimation and testing.
    Keselman HJ; Wilcox RR; Lix LM; Algina J; Fradette K
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2007 Nov; 60(Pt 2):267-93. PubMed ID: 17971270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Bootstrap confidence intervals in multi-level simultaneous component analysis.
    Timmerman ME; Kiers HA; Smilde AK; Ceulemans E; Stouten J
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 May; 62(Pt 2):299-318. PubMed ID: 18086338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparing groups in a before-after design: when t test and ANCOVA produce different results.
    Wright DB
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2006 Sep; 76(Pt 3):663-75. PubMed ID: 16953968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Hypothesis testing, statistical power, and confidence limits in the presence of epistemic uncertainty.
    Hofer E
    Health Phys; 2007 Mar; 92(3):226-35. PubMed ID: 17293694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Generalization of the Brown-Forsythe approach to factorial designs].
    Vallejo Seco G; Fernández García MP; Livacic Rojas PE
    Psicothema; 2008 Nov; 20(4):969-73. PubMed ID: 18940112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A note on using alpha and stratified alpha to estimate the reliability of a test composed of item parcels.
    Rae G
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 Nov; 61(Pt 2):515-25. PubMed ID: 19017437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Useful effect size interpretations for single case research.
    Parker RI; Hagan-Burke S
    Behav Ther; 2007 Mar; 38(1):95-105. PubMed ID: 17292698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Still much to learn about confidence intervals: reply to Rounder and Morey (2005).
    Fidler F; Thomason N; Cumming G; Finch S; Leeman J
    Psychol Sci; 2005 Jun; 16(6):494-5. PubMed ID: 15943677
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Qualitative research and its place in psychological science.
    Madill A; Gough B
    Psychol Methods; 2008 Sep; 13(3):254-71. PubMed ID: 18778154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Mixture distribution latent state-trait analysis: basic ideas and applications.
    Courvoisier DS; Eid M; Nussbeck FW
    Psychol Methods; 2007 Mar; 12(1):80-104. PubMed ID: 17402813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Using confidence intervals for graphically based data interpretation.
    Masson ME
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2003 Sep; 57(3):203-20. PubMed ID: 14596478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Incorporating randomness in the Fisher information for improving item-exposure control in CATs.
    Barrada JR; Olea J; Ponsoda V; Abad FJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 Nov; 61(Pt 2):493-513. PubMed ID: 17681109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A cautionary note on the effects of range restriction on predictor intercorrelations.
    Sackett PR; Lievens F; Berry CM; Landers RN
    J Appl Psychol; 2007 Mar; 92(2):538-44. PubMed ID: 17371098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Standardized or simple effect size: what should be reported?
    Baguley T
    Br J Psychol; 2009 Aug; 100(Pt 3):603-17. PubMed ID: 19017432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Sample size and the detection of correlation--a signal detection account: comment on Kareev (2000) and Juslin and Olsson (2005).
    Anderson RB; Doherty ME; Berg ND; Friedrich JC
    Psychol Rev; 2005 Jan; 112(1):268-79; discussion 280-5. PubMed ID: 15631599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.