These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18940836)

  • 1. Heterogeneous views on heterogeneity.
    Patsopoulos NA; Evangelou E; Ioannidis JP
    Int J Epidemiol; 2009 Dec; 38(6):1740-2. PubMed ID: 18940836
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comment on: Heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be expected and appropriately quantified.
    Coory MD
    Int J Epidemiol; 2010 Jun; 39(3):932; author reply 933. PubMed ID: 19349478
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. HELOW: a program for testing extreme homogeneity in meta-analysis.
    Zintzaras E; Ioannidis JP
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2014 Nov; 117(2):383-6. PubMed ID: 25023534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Heterogeneity in meta-analyses. Comparing apples and oranges?
    Choi SW; Lam DM
    Anaesthesia; 2017 Apr; 72(4):532-534. PubMed ID: 28213890
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The practice of systematic reviews. V. Heterogeneity between studies and subgroup analysis].
    Scholten RJ; Assendelft WJ; Kostense PJ; Bouter LM
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 Apr; 143(16):843-8. PubMed ID: 10347653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Commentary: Heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be expected and appropriately quantified.
    Higgins JP
    Int J Epidemiol; 2008 Oct; 37(5):1158-60. PubMed ID: 18832388
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Meta-analysis for orthodontists: Part II--Is all that glitters gold?
    Papageorgiou SN
    J Orthod; 2014 Dec; 41(4):327-36. PubMed ID: 25404669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On pooled and stratified analysis of epidemiologic rates.
    Nurminen M
    Public Health Rev; 1988; 16(3-4):163-87. PubMed ID: 3272013
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Performing and evaluating meta-analyses.
    Burcharth J; Pommergaard HC; Rosenberg J
    Surgery; 2015 Feb; 157(2):189-93. PubMed ID: 25304841
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quasi-empirical Bayes methodology for improving meta-analysis.
    Saleh AK; Hassanein KM; Hassanein RS; Kim HM
    J Biopharm Stat; 2006; 16(1):77-90. PubMed ID: 16440838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Meta-analysis: fact or fiction? How to interpret meta-analyses.
    Huf W; Kalcher K; Pail G; Friedrich ME; Filzmoser P; Kasper S
    World J Biol Psychiatry; 2011 Apr; 12(3):188-200. PubMed ID: 21375365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Meta-analysis: different methods--different conclusions?
    Böckenhoff A; Hartung J
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2000; 77():39-43. PubMed ID: 11187581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Combining heterogenous studies using the random-effects model is a mistake and leads to inconclusive meta-analyses.
    Al Khalaf MM; Thalib L; Doi SA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Feb; 64(2):119-23. PubMed ID: 20409685
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Meta-analysis of clinical trials: uses and pitfalls].
    Boissel JP
    Bull Acad Natl Med; 2007; 191(4-5):759-70. PubMed ID: 18225428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Borrowing strength from external trials in a meta-analysis.
    Higgins JP; Whitehead A
    Stat Med; 1996 Dec; 15(24):2733-49. PubMed ID: 8981683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interpretation of tests of heterogeneity and bias in meta-analysis.
    Ioannidis JP
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Oct; 14(5):951-7. PubMed ID: 19018930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of methods for fixed effects meta-analysis of individual patient data with time to event outcomes.
    Tudur Smith C; Williamson PR
    Clin Trials; 2007; 4(6):621-30. PubMed ID: 18042571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Meta-analysis for orthodontists: Part I--How to choose effect measure and statistical model.
    Papageorgiou SN
    J Orthod; 2014 Dec; 41(4):317-26. PubMed ID: 25404668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The use of meta-analytic statistical significance testing.
    Polanin JR; Pigott TD
    Res Synth Methods; 2015 Mar; 6(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 26035470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Demystifying fixed and random effects meta-analysis.
    Nikolakopoulou A; Mavridis D; Salanti G
    Evid Based Ment Health; 2014 May; 17(2):53-7. PubMed ID: 24692250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.