These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18940973)

  • 1. Tort litigation and federal regulation of medical devices.
    Piwinski S; Fitzpatrick S
    JAMA; 2008 Oct; 300(16):1881-2; author reply 1882. PubMed ID: 18940973
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The deregulatory effects of preempting tort litigation: FDA regulation of medical devices.
    Gostin LO
    JAMA; 2008 May; 299(19):2313-6. PubMed ID: 18492972
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The need for federal preemption of state tort claims in the context of "new drugs" and premarket-approved medical devices.
    Mottes LM
    Seton Hall Law Rev; 2011; 41(2):723-63. PubMed ID: 21739761
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pharma industry's bitter pill ... could be impetus for devicemaker legislation, too.
    Blesch G
    Mod Healthc; 2009 Mar; 39(10):11. PubMed ID: 19610180
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Permitting product liability litigation for FDA-approved drugs and devices promotes patient safety.
    Kesselheim AS
    Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2010 Jun; 87(6):645-7. PubMed ID: 20485322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Consti-tortion: tort law as an end-run around abortion rights after Planned Parenthood v. Casey.
    Stone AJ
    Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 2000; 8(2):471-515. PubMed ID: 16594110
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Legal failure or moral success? An evaluation of the ban on partial-birth abortion.
    Kolenc AB
    America (NY); 2004 Nov; 191(17):11-4. PubMed ID: 15675070
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The role of federal preemption in injury prevention litigation.
    Vernick JS
    J Law Med Ethics; 2011 Mar; 39 Suppl 1():85-8. PubMed ID: 21309905
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The medical device safety act of 2009: clarifying preemption.
    Turcott RG; Ashley EA
    Am J Ther; 2009; 16(6):471-4. PubMed ID: 19940607
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tort claims and federal regulation of medical devices vs pharmaceuticals.
    Green M
    JAMA; 2009 Sep; 302(11):1169; author reply 1169-70. PubMed ID: 19755694
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Preemption and malpractice liability.
    Hauser RG
    N Engl J Med; 2009 May; 360(21):2257-8; author reply 2258. PubMed ID: 19458378
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Federal regulatory pre-emption of state tort claims against the manufacturers of medical devices and pharmaceutical drugs.
    Jacobstein JM
    J Law Med Ethics; 2008; 36(3):594-7. PubMed ID: 18840254
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In new court, Roe may stand, so foes look to limit its scope.
    Toner R; Liptak A
    N Y Times Web; 2005 Jul; ():A1, A16. PubMed ID: 16060018
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pharmaceuticals and medical devices: medical devices. End-of-year issue brief.
    Chaps NA
    Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv; 2010 Jan; ():1-25. PubMed ID: 20217916
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Administrative "health courts" for medical injury claims: the federal constitutional issues.
    Elliott ED; Narayan SA; Nasmith MS
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 2008 Aug; 33(4):761-98. PubMed ID: 18617674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Daubert motion: a legal strategy to exclude essential scientific evidence in toxic tort litigation.
    Melnick RL
    Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S30-4. PubMed ID: 16030335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Discovery rule in medical malpractice under the Federal Tort Claims Act: the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. Kubrick was not meant to be secondary authority.
    Zajdel C
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 2004; 20(2):443-66. PubMed ID: 15239365
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Medical Device Safety Act of 2009.
    Curfman GD; Morrissey S; Drazen JM
    N Engl J Med; 2009 Apr; 360(15):1550-1. PubMed ID: 19297562
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. AIDS discrimination under federal, state, and local law after Arline.
    Wasson RP
    Fla State Univ Law Rev; 1987; 15(2):221-78. PubMed ID: 11658972
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Abortion still a constitutional issue.
    Lancet; 1983 Apr; 1(8329):866-7. PubMed ID: 11644255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.